Quality of Health Care: Informatics Foundations

Methods of Information in Medicine

Volumn 42, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 509-518

  Hasman, Arie ^a   Safran, C ^b,c   Takeda, H ^d  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c Clinician Support Technology   (United States)

^d OSAKA UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Computerized guideline systems; Decision support; Decision support methods; Guideline models; Literature review; Physician order entry systems; Risk management

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATION; COMPUTER SYSTEM; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; LITERATURE; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; MEDICAL RECORD; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; QUALITY CONTROL; REVIEW; RISK MANAGEMENT;

EID: 0347595694     PISSN: 00261270     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1634377     Document Type: Review

References (52)

1. Miller RA, Pople HE, Myers JD. INTERNIST-1, an experimental computer-based diagnostic consultant for general internal medicine. N Engl J Med 1982; 307: 468-76.
2. Berman L, Miller RA. Problem area formation as an element of computer aided diagnosis: a comparison of two strategies within Quick Medical Reference (QMR). Methods Inf Med 1991; 30: 90-5.
3. Lau LM, Warner HR. Performance of a diagnostic system (Iliad) as a tool for quality assurance. Comput Biomed Res 1992; 25: 314-23.
4. Feldman MJ, Barnett GO. An approach to evaluating the accuracy of Dxplain. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 1991; 35: 261-6.
5. Blois MS. Information and medicine. The nature of medical descriptions. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; 1984.
6. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS (eds). To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health Care System. Committee on Quality of Health Care in America, Institute of Medicine. Washington DC: National Academy Press; 1999.
7. Staender S, Davies J, Helmreich B, Sexton B, Kaufmann BM. The anaesthesia critical incident reporting system: an experience based database. Int J Med Inf 1997; 47: 87-90.
8. Fox J, Das S. Safe and sound: artificial intelligence in hazardous applications. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press/The MIT Press; 2000.
9. Kobus DA, Amundson D, Moses JD, Rascona D, Gubler KD. A computerized medical incident reporting system for errors in the intensive care unit: initial evaluation of interrater agreement. Mil Med 2001; 166: 350-3.
10. Stanhope N, Crowley-Murphy M, Vincent C, O'Connor AM, Taylor-Adams SE. An evaluation of adverse incident reporting. J Eval Clin Pract 1999; 5: 1-4.
11. Deming W. Out of the Crisis. Boston: MIT Press; 1982.
12. Blumenthal D, Scheck AC. Improving Clinical Practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1995.
13. Berner ES, Webster GD, Shugerman AA et al. Performance of four computer-based diagnostic systems. N Engl J Med 1994; 330: 1792-6.
14. Elstein AE, Friedman CP, Wolf FM et al. Effects of a decision support system on the diagnostic accuracy of users: a preliminary report. JAMIA 1996; 3: 422-8.
15. Friedman CP, Elstein AE, Wolf FM et al. Enhancement of clinician's diagnostic reasoning by computer based consultation. A multi-site study of 2 systems. JAMA 1999; 282: 1851-6.
16. Balas EA, Austin SM, Mitchell JA, Ewigman BG, Bopp KD, Brown GD. The clinical value of computerized information services. A review of 98 randomized clinical trials. Arch Fam Med 1996; 5: 271-6.
17. Shea S, Dumouchel W, Bahamonde L. A meta-analysis of 16 randomized controlled trials to evaluate computer-based clinical reminder systems for preventive care in the ambulatory setting. JAMIA 1996; 3 (6): 399-409.
18. Austin SM, Balas EA, Mitchel JA, Ewigman BG. Effect of physician reminders on preventive care: meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials. JAMIA 1994; 1 (suppl): 121-4.
19. Johnston ME, Langton KB, Haynes RB, Mathieu A. Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on clinical performance and patient outcome. Ann Intern Med 1994; 120: 135-42.
20. Hunt DL, Haynes RB, Hanna SE, Smith K. Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes. JAMA 1998; 280: 1339-46.
21. Balas EA, Weingarten S, Garb CT, Blumenthal D, Boren SA, Brown GD. Improving preventive care by prompting physicians. Arch Intern Med. 2000; 160: 301-8.
22. Oxman AD, Thomson MA, Davis DA, Haynes RB. No magic bullets: a systematic review of 102 trials of interventions to improve professional practice. Can Med Assoc J 1995; 153 (10): 1423-31.
23. Field MJ, Lohr KN (eds). Clinical practice guidelines: directions for a new program. Washington DC: National Academy Press; 1990.
24. Grimshaw JM, Russel IT. Effects of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluation. Lancet 1993; 342: 1317-22.
25. Field MJ, Lohr KN (eds). Guidelines for clinical practice guidelines: from development to use. Washington DC: National Academy Press; 1992.
26. Payne TH. Computer decision support systems. Chest 2000; 118: 47S-52S.
27. Teich JM, Wrinn MM. Clinical decision support systems come of age. MD computing 2000; 17 (1):43-6.
28. Reggia JA, Tuhrim S. Computer-assisted medical decision making. Volumes 1 and 2. New York: Springer Verlag; 1985.
29. Miller PL. Selected topics in medical artificial intelligence. New York: Springer Verlag; 1988.
30. Wang D, Peleg M, Tu SW et al. Representation primitives, process models and patient data in computer-interpretable clinical practice guidelines: a literature review of guideline representation models. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2002; 68: 59-70.
31. Hripcsak G, Ludemann P, Pryor TA, Wigertz OB, Clayon PD. Rationale for the Arden Syntax. Comput Biomed Res 1994; 27 (4): 291-324.
32. Ohno-Machado L, Gennari JH, Murphy S, Jain NL, Tu SW et al. The Guideline Interchange Format: A model for representing guidelines. JAMIA 1998; 5 (4): 357-72.
33. Peleg M, Boxwala A, Ogunyemi O, Zeng Q, Tu SW, et al. GLIF3: the evolution of a guideline representation format. In: Proc AMIA Annual Symposium 2000: 645-9.
34. Fox J, Johns N, Lyons C, Rahmanzadeh A, et al. PROforma: a general technology for clinical decision support systems. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 1997; 54 (1-2): 59-67.
35. Shahar Y, Miksch S, Johnson P. The Asgaard project: a task specific framework for the application and critiquing of time-oriented clinical guidelines. Artif Intell Med 1998; 14 (1-2): 29-51.
36. Musen MA, Tu SW, Das AK, Shahar Y. EON: a component based approach to automation of protocol-directed therapy. JAMIA 1996; 3 (6): 367-88.
37. Grosso WE, Eriksson H, Fergerson RW, Gennari JH, Tu SW, Musen MA. Knowledge Modeling at the Millennium (The Design and Evolution of Protégé-2000). Twelfth Workshop on Knowledge Acquisition, Modeling and Management (KAW '99) 1999.
38. De Clercq PA, Hasman A, Blom JA, Korsten HHM. Design and implementation of a framework to support the development of clinical guidelines. Int J Med Inf 2001; 64 (2-3): 285-318.
39. McDonald CJ, Overhage JM, Tierney WM, et al. The Regenstrief Medical Record System: a quarter century experience. Int J Med Inf 1999; 54 (3): 225-53.
40. Bates DW, Leape LL, Cullen DJ, et al. Effect of computerized physician order entry and a team intervention on prevention of serious medication errors. JAMA 1998; 280 (15): 1311-6.
41. Lee F, Teich JM, Spurr CD, Bates DW. Implementation of physician order entry: user satisfaction and self-reported usage patterns. JAMIA 1996; 3 (1): 42-55.
42. Overhage JM, Perkins S, Tiernev WM, McDonald CJ. Control trial of direct physician order entry. JAMIA 2001; 8: 361-71.
43. Matsumura Y, Takeda H, Inoue M. Implementation of the totally integrated hospital information system (HUMANE) in Osaka university hospital, In: Greenes RA, Peterson AH, Prottie DJ (eds) Medinfo '95, North-Holland, Amsterdam; 1995: 590-3.
44. Sittig DF, Stead WW. Computer-based physician order entry: the state of the art. JAMIA 1994; 1: 108-23.
45. Haruki Y, Ogushi Y, Okada Y, Kimura M, Kumamoto I, Sekita Y. Status and perspective of hospital information systems in Japan. Methods Inf Med 1999; 38: 200-6.
46. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 43, Making Health Care Safer: A Critical Analysis of Patient Safety Practices, AHRQ Publication No. 01-E058.
47. Nakajima K, Kuwata S, Matsumura SY, Oshima H, Takeda H. Operation and effects of computerized incident reporting system for prevention of medical adverse events. J Japanese Medical Informatics Assoc 2001; 21: 77-82.
48. Takeda H, Matsumura Y, Okada T, Kuwata S, Inoue M. A Japanese approach to establish an electronic patient record system in an intelligent hospital. Int J Med Inform 1998; 49: 45-51.
49. Matsumura Y, Takeda H, Okada T, Kuwata S, Hiroaki N, Hazumi N, Inoue M. Devices for structured data entry in electronic patient record. In: Cesnik B, McCray AT, Scerrer JR (eds) IOS Press, Amsterdam, Medinfo '98. 1998: 85-8.
50. Matsumura Y, Kuwata S, Kusuoka H, Takahashi Y, Onishi H, Kawamoto T, Takeda H. Dynamic Viewer of Medical Events in Electronic Medical Record. In: Patel VL, Rogers R, Haux R (eds), IOS Press, Amsterdam, Medinfo 2001, 2001: 648-52.
51. Kondoh H, Takeda H, Matsumura Y, Kuwata S, Yoshimua H, Narumi Y, Nakamura H, Okura Y, Inamura K, Washiashi T, Okada S. PACS linked to EPR. In: Patel VL, Rogers R, Haux R (eds) IOS Press, Amsterdam, Medinfo 2001, 2001: 915-8.
52. Bates DW, Scott Evans R, Murff H et al. Detecting adverse events using information technology. JAMIA 2003; 10: 115-28.