Using equation discovery to revise an Earth ecosystem model of the carbon net production

Ecological Modelling

Volumn 170, Issue 2-3, 2003, Pages 141-154

  Todorovski, Ljupčo ^a   Džeroski, Sašo ^a   Langley, Pat ^b   Potter, Christopher ^c  

^a JO EF STEFAN INSTITUTE   (Slovenia)

^b Institute for the Study of Learning and Expertise   (United States)

^c NASA AMES RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Carbon net production; Equation discovery; Machine learning; Model revision

Indexed keywords

CARBON BALANCE; ECOSYSTEM MODELING; NET ECOSYSTEM PRODUCTION;

EID: 0347567448     PISSN: 03043800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3800(03)00222-9     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Džeroski, S., 2001. Applications of symbolic machine learning to ecological modelling. Ecol. Model. 146, 263-273.
2. Džeroski, S., Todorovski, L., Bratko, I., Kompare, B., Križman, V., 1999. Equation discovery with ecological applications. In: Fielding, A.H. (Ed.), Machine Learning Methods for Ecological Applications. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 185-207.
3. Hopcroft, J.E., Ullman, J.D., 1979. Introduction to Automata Theory, Languages and Computation. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
4. Langley, P., Simon, H.A., Bradshaw, G.L., Żythow, J.M., 1987. Scientific Discovery. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
5. Ourston, D., Mooney, R.J., 1994. Theory refinement combining analytical and empirical methods. Artif. Intell. 66, 273-309.
6. Potter, C.S., Klooster, S.A., 1997. Global model estimates of carbon and nitrogen storage in litter and soil pools: response to change in vegetation quality and biomass allocation. Tellus 49B, 1-17.
7. 2O, NO) fluxes and analysis of controllers on regional to global scales. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 12, 621-635.
8. Potter, C.S., Klooster, S.A., 1999. Dynamic global vegetation modeling (dgvm) for prediction of plant functional types and biogenic trace gas fluxes. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. Lett. 8, 473-488.
9. Press, W.H., Flannery, B.P., Teukolsky, S.A., Vetterlin, W.T., 1986. Numerical Recipes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.
10. Richter, T., 1997. A new measure of the distance between ordered trees and its applications (technical report). Department of Computer Science IV, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
11. Saito, K., Langley, P., Grenager, T., Potter, C.S., Torregrosa, A., Klooster, S.A., 2001. Computational revision of quantitative scientific models. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Discovery Science. Springer, Berlin, pp. 336-349.
12. Shasha, D., Zhang, K., 1997. Approximate tree pattern matching. In: Pattern Matching Algorithms. Oxford University Press, London, pp. 341-371.
13. Todorovski, L., Džeroski, S., 1997. Declarative bias in equation discovery. In: Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann, Los Altos, CA, pp. 376-384.
14. Todorovski, L., Džeroski, S. (2001). Using domain knowledge on population dynamics modeling for equation discovery. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth European Conference on Machine Learning. Springer, Berlin, pp. 478-490.
15. Todorovski, L., Džeroski, S., Kompare, B., 1998. Modelling and prediction of phytoplankton growth with equation discovery. Ecol. Model. 113, 71-81.
16. Towell, G.G., Shavlik, J.W., 1994. Knowledge-based artificial neural networks. Artif. Intell. 70, 119-165.
17. Whigham, P.A., Recknagel, F., 2000. Predicting chlorophyll-a in freshwater lakes by hybridising process-based models and genetic algorithms. Book of Abstracts of the Second International Conference on Applications of Machine Learning to Ecological Modeling, Adelaide University.
18. Wrobel, S., 1996. First order theory refinement. In: Raedt, L.D. (Ed.), Advances in Inductive Logic Programming. IOS Press, pp. 14-33.