Monitoring Change in Mountainous Dry-heath Vegetation at a Regional Scale Using Multitemporal Landsat TM Data

Ambio

Volumn 32, Issue 8, 2003, Pages 502-509

  Nordberg, Maj Liz ^a   Evertson, Joakim ^a,b  

^a STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b SwedPower AB   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; HEATHLAND; LANDSAT THEMATIC MAPPER; NDVI; VEGETATION COVER;

EURASIA; EUROPE; JAMTLAND; NORTHERN EUROPE; SCANDINAVIA; SWEDEN;

EID: 0347567246     PISSN: 00447447     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1579/0044-7447-32.8.502     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Rafstedt, T. 1984. Vegetation of the Swedish Mountain Area, Jämtlands County. A Survey on the Basis of Vegetation Mapping and Assessment of the Natural Values. Stockholm, Sweden: Department of Physical Geography, Stockholm University, and National Swedish Environmental Protection Board, 144 p. (In Swedish.)
2. . Swedish EPA. 1999. Miljömålen i Sverige. System med Indikatorer för Nationell Uppföljning av Miljökvalitetsmå len. Stockholm, Sweden: Report 5006, Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, 94 pp. (In Swedish with English summary).
3. Nordberg, M.-L and Allard, A. 2002. A remote sensing methodology for monitoring lichen cover. Can. J. Remote Sens. 28, 262-274.
4. th International Symposium on Remote Sensing of Environment, Tromsö, 431-435.
5. Allard, A., Ihse, M. and Nordberg, M.-L. 1998. Vegetationsförä ndringar i Fjällen -Metodstudier i Norra Fjällen med Hjälp av IRF-Flygbilder och Satellitbilder. Department of Physical Geography, Stockholm University, Research Report Series No. 109. 64pp. (In Swedish).
6. Lawrence, R.L. and Ripple, W.J. 1998. Comparison among vegetation indices and bandwise regression in a highly disturbed, heterogeneous landscape: Mount St. Helens, Washington. Remote Sens. Environ. 64, 91-102.
7. Heute, A.R. 1988. A soil-adjusted vegetation index (SAVI). Remote Sens. Environ. 29, 295-309.
8. Schmidt, H. and Karnieli, A. 2001. Sensitivity of vegetation indices to substrate brightness in hyper-arid environment: The Makhtesh Ramon Crater (Israel) case study. Int. J. Remote Sens. 22, 3503-3520.
9. Singh, A. 1989. Digital change detection techniques using remotely-sensed data. Int. J. Remote Sens. 10, 989-1003.
10. Yuan, D. and Elvidge, C. 1998. NALC land cover change detection pilot study: Washington D.C. Area experiments. Remote Sens. Environ. 66, 166-178.
11. Andréfouët, S., Muller-Karger, F.E., Hochberg, E.J., Hu, C. and Carder, K.L. 2001. Change detection in shallow coral reef environments using landsat ETM+ data. Remote Sens. Environ. 78, 150-162.
12. Collins, J.C. and Woodcock, C.E. 1996. An assessment of several change detection techniques for mapping forest mortality using multitemporal landsat TM data. Remote Sens. Environ. 56, 66-77.
13. García-Haro, F.J., Gilabert, M.A. and Meliá, J. 2001. Monitoring fire-affected areas using thematicmapper data. Int. J. Remote Sens. 22, 533-549.
14. Lunetta, R.S., Ediriwickrema, J., Johnson, D., Lyon, J.G. and McKerrow, A. 2002. Impacts of vegetation dynamics on the identification of land-cover change in a biologically complex community in North Carolina, USA. Remote Sens. Environ. 82, 258-270.
15. Read, J.M., and Lam, N.S-.N. 2002. Spatial methods for characterising land cover and detecting land-cover changes for the tropics. Int. J. Remote Sens. 23, 2457-2474.
16. Ridd, M.K. and Liu, J. 1998. A comparison of four algorithms for change detection in an urban environment. Remote Sens. Environ. 63, 95-100.