The Random Projection Method for Hyperbolic Conservation Laws with Stiff Reaction Terms

Journal of Computational Physics

Volumn 163, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 216-248

  Bao, Weizhu ^a,b   Jin, Shi ^a,c  

^a GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NUMERICAL METHODS;

HYPERBOLIC CONSERVATION LAWS; IGNITION TEMPERATURES; NUMERICAL SOLUTION; ORDERS OF MAGNITUDE; PROPAGATION SPEED; RANDOM PROJECTION METHODS; REACTION TERMS; REACTIVE FLOW; SOURCE TERMS; TIME-SCALES;

PHYSICAL PROPERTIES;

EID: 0347560394     PISSN: 00219991     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jcph.2000.6572     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. M. Ben-Artzi, The generalized Riemann problem for reactive flows, J. Comput. Phys. 81, 70 (1989).
2. A. C. Berkenbosch, E. F. Kaasschieter, and R. Klein, Detonation capturing for stiff combustion chemistry, Combust. Theory Model. 2, 313 (1998).
3. A. Bourlioux, A. Majda, and C. Roytburd, Theoretical and numerical structure for unstable one-dimensional detonations, SIAM J. Appl. Math. 51, 303 (1991).
4. A. J. Chorin, Random choice solution of hyperbolic systems, J. Comput. Phys. 22, 517 (1976).
5. A. J. Chorin, Random choice methods with applications to reacting gas flow, J. Comput. Phys. 25, 253 (1977).
6. P. Colella, Glimm's method for gas dynamics, SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput. 3, 76 (1982).
7. P. Colella, A. Majda, and V. Roytburd, Theoretical and numerical structure for reacting shock waves, SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput. 7, 1059 (1986).
8. R. Courant and K. O. Friedrichs, Supersonic flow and Shock Waves (Interscience, New York, 1971).
9. T. Elperin and O. Igra, About the choice of uniformly distributed sequences to be used in the random choice method, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 57, 181 (1986).
10. B. Engquist and B. Sjogreen, Numerical approximation of hyperbolic conservation laws with stiff terms, in Proc. Third Int. Conf. on Hyperbolic Problems (Studentlitteratur, Lund, 1991), p. 848.
11. B. Engquist and B. Sjogreen, Robust Difference Approximations of Stiff Inviscid Detonation Waves, CAM Report 91-03 (UCLA, 1991).
12. H. Fan, S. Jin, and Z. H. Teng, Zero reaction limit for hyperbolic conservation laws with source terms, J. Differential Equations, to appear.
13. J. Glimm, Solutions in the large for nonlinear hyperbolic systems of equations, Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 18, 697 (1965).
14. J. M. Hammersley and D. C. Handscomb, Monte Carlo Methods (Methuen, London, 1965).
15. S. Jin and Z. P. Xin, The relaxation schemes for systems of conservation laws in arbitrary space dimensions, Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 48, 235 (1995).
16. R. J. LeVeque and H. C. Yee, A study of numerical methods for hyperbolic conservation laws with stiff source terms, J. Comput. Phys. 86, 187 (1990).
17. A. Majda, A qualitative model for dynamic combustion, SIAM J. Appl. Math. 41, 70 (1981).
18. R. B. Pember, Numerical methods for hyperbolic conservation laws with stiff relaxation. I. Spurious solutions, SIAM J. Appl. Math. 53, 1293 (1993).
19. R. A. Strehlow, The nature of traverse waves in detonation, Astronaut. Acta 14, 539 (1969).
20. H. C. Yee and P. K. Sweby, Nonlinear Dynamics & Numerical Uncertainties in CFD, NASA TM 110398, 1998.