Reduced models for linear groundwater flow models using empirical orthogonal functions

Advances in Water Resources

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 57-69

  Vermeulen, P T M ^a   Heemink, A W ^a   Te Stroet, C B M ^b  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b TNO   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Empirical orthogonal functions; Galerkin projection; Groundwater; MODFLOW; Reduced model; State space projection

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; FUNCTIONS; GALERKIN METHODS; GROUNDWATER FLOW; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

HYDRAULIC HEAD; SPATIAL PATTERNS;

WATER RESOURCES;

FLOW MODELING; GROUNDWATER; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; POROUS MEDIUM;

FLOW MODELING; GROUNDWATER FLOW; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; POROUS MEDIUM;

EID: 0347504604     PISSN: 03091708     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2003.09.008     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Adomaitis RA. RTCVD model reduction: a collocation on empirical eigenfunctions approach. Technical Report T.R. 95-64, Inst Systems Research, University of Maryland in College Park, MD, 1995
2. Cazemier W. Verstappen R.W.C.P. Veldman A.E.P. Proper orthogonal decomposition and low-dimensional models for driven cavity flows Phys. Fluids 10 1998 1685-1699
3. Dely F. Buoro A. Marsily de G. Empirical orthogonal functions analysis applied to the inverse problem in hydrogeology: evaluation of uncertainty and simulation of new solutions Math. Geol. 33 8 2001 927-949
4. Delville J. Lamballais E. Bonnet J.P. POD, LODS and LSE: their links to control and simulation of mixing layers ERCOFTAC Bull. 46 2000 29-38
5. Golub G. Loan van A. Matrix computations 2nd ed. 1989 John Hopkins University Press
6. Heemink A.W. Verlaan M. Segers A.J. Variance reduced ensemble Kalman filtering Mon. Weather Rev. 129 7 2001 1718-1728
7. Hoffmann Jørgensen B. Sørensen J.N. Proper orthogonal decomposition and low-dimensional modelling ERCOFTAC Bull. 46 2000 44-51
8. Hooimeijer M.A. Reduction of complex computational models 2001 Sieca Repro Delft
9. Krysl P, Lall S, Marsden JE. Dimensional model reduction in non-linear finite element dynamics of solids and structures. Int J Numer Meth Engng, in press
10. McDonald MG, Harbaugh AW. A modular three-dimensional finite-difference groundwater flow model. US Geological Survey, Open-File Report 83-875, Book 6, Chapter A1, 1988
11. Newman AJ. Model reduction via the Karhunen-Loève expansion--part I: An exposition. Technical Report T.R. 96-32. Inst Systems Research, University of Maryland in College Park, MD, 1996
12. Newman AJ. Model reduction via the Karhunen-Loève expansion--part II: Some elementary examples. Technical Report T.R. 96-33. Inst Systems Research, University of Maryland in College Park, MD, 1996
13. Overschee Van P. Moor De B. Subspace identification for linear systems. Theory, implementation, applications 1996 Kluwer Academic Publishers
14. Park H.M. Cho C.H. Low dimensional modeling of flow reactors Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 39 16 1996 3311-3323
15. Reyment R.A. Jöreskog K.G. Applied factor analysis in the natural sciences 1993 Cambridge University Press
16. Sirovich L. Turbulence and the dynamics of coherent structures--Part I: Coherent structures Quart. Appl. Math. 45 3 1987 561-571
17. von Storch H. Statistical aspects of estimated principal vectors (EOFs) based on small sample sizes J. Climate Appl. Meteorol. 24 1985 716-724
18. Vermeulen PTM, Heemink AW, Stroet te CBM. Model Reduction In Groundwater Hydrology. In: Final Proc Int Conf on Modelling and Simulation, Canberra, Australia, vol. 1. 2001, p. 407-12
19. Vermeulen PTM, Heemink AW, Stroet te CBM. Reduction of large-scale numerical groundwater flow models. In: Final Proc XIV Int Conf on Computational Methods in Water Resources, Delft, the Netherlands, vol. 1. 2002, p. 397-404
20. Vermeulen PTM, Heemink AW, Stroet te CBM. Low-dimensional modeling of numerical groundwater flow. J Hydrol Process, in press