Revisiting the Hanbury Brown-Twist setup for fractional statistics

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 91, Issue 19, 2003, Pages

  Vishveshwara, Smitha ^a  

^a University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CORRELATION METHODS; DECOMPOSITION; ELECTRIC CURRENTS; FERMIONS; HALL EFFECT; OSCILLATIONS; QUANTUM THEORY; WAVE EQUATIONS;

BOSONS; EDGE STATE QUASIPARTICLES; FRACTIONAL QUANTUM HALL SYSTEMS; FRACTIONAL STATISTICS; HANBURY BROWN TWIST SET UP; QUASIPARTICLE CURRENTS; WAVE FUNCTIONS;

CHARGED PARTICLES;

EID: 0347477216     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. R. B. Laughlin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1395 (1983)
2. R. B. Laughlin, Rev. Mod. Phys. 71, 863 (1999).
3. B. I. Halperin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 1583 (1984).
4. J. K. Jain, G. S. Jeon, and K. L. Graham, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 036801 (2003).
5. D. Arovas, J. R. Schrieffer, and F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 722 (1984).
6. X. G. Wen, Adv. Phys. 44, 405 (1995).
7. E. Fradkin, in Quantum Physics at Mesoscopic Scales, edited by C. Glattli, M. Sanquer, and J. T. T. Van (EDP Sciences, Les Ulis, 2000).
8. C. L. Kane, cond-mat/0210621
9. C. Chamon, D. E. Freed, S. A. Kivelson, S. L. Sondhi, and X. G. Wen, Phys. Rev. B 55, 2331 (1997).
10. I. Safi, P. Devillard, and T. Martin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 4628 (2001).
11. G. Baym, Acta Phys. Pol. B 29, 1 (1998).
12. R. Hanbury Brown and R. Q. Twiss, Philos. Mag. 7, 663 (1954)
13. R. Hanbury Brown and R. Q. Twiss, Nature (London) 177, 27 (1956)
14. R. Hanbury Brown and R. Q. Twiss, Nature (London) 178, 1046 (1956)
15. E. Purcell, Nature (London) 178, 1449 (1956).
16. H. Kiesel, A. Renz, and F. Hasselbach, Nature (London) 418, 392 (2002)
17. M. Henny et al., Science 284, 296 (1999)
18. W. D. Oliver, J. Kim, R. C. Liu, and Y. Yamamoto, Science 284, 299 (1999)
19. R. C. Liu, B. Odom, Y. Yamamoto, and S. Tarucha, Nature (London) 391, 263 (1998).
20. C. L. Kane and M. P. A. Fisher, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 724 (1994).
21. L. Saminadayar, D. C. Glattli, Y. Jin, and B. Etienne, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 2526 (1997)
22. R. de Picciotto, M. Reznikov, M. Heiblum, V. Umansky, G. Bunin, and D. Mahalu, Nature (London) 389, 162 (1997).
23. X. G. Wen, Phys. Rev. B 43, 11 025 (1991)
24. X. G. Wen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 2206 (1990)
25. X. G. Wen, Phys. Rev. B 44, 5708 (1991).
26. M. Buttiker, Phys. Rev. B 46, 12 485 (1992)
27. Y. M. Blanter and M. Buttiker, Phys. Rep. 336, 1 (2000), and references therein.
28. For instance, for states described by the composite fermion approach [17], the Aharanov-Bohm phase would have to involve an effective magnetic field [3]. Alternatively, in an edge-state description of quasiparticles in these states [see, for example, A. Lopez and E. Fradkin, Phys. Rev. B 59, 15 323 (1999)], one would require charge and topological sectors, both of which would contribute to the phase factor.
29. J. K. Jain, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 199 (1989)
30. J. K. Jain, Phys. Today 53, No. 4, 39 (2000).