Does consensus make common sense? An analysis of epa's common sense initiative

Environment

Volumn 46, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 10-25

  McGowan, Alan H ^a  

^a NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONSENSUS; DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; LAW; POLICY; POLLUTION; POLLUTION CONTROL; PUBLICATION; REVIEW; TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 0347418163     PISSN: 00139157     EISSN: 19399154     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00139150409603195     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. K. Q.Seelye, "Bush Nominates Utah Governor to Lead Environmental Agency"The New York Times. 12August 2003, A1.
2. "Green Grief." Wall Street Journal (editorial). 24 September 2003. A22.
3. C.Browner. 'The Common Sense Initiative: A New Generation of Environmental Protection." speech at the Center for National Policy Newsmaker Luncheon. Washington. DC. 20July 1994.
4. V.Norherg-Bohm. "Stimulating Green Technological Innovation: An Analysis of Alternative Policy Mechanisms."Policy Sciences32(1999): 13-38.
5. R. Hahn, S.Olmstead, and R.Stavins. "Environmental Regulation in the 1990s: A Retrospective Analysis."Haironl Environmental Law Review27.no. 377(2003): 396.
6. D. J.Fiorino. "Toward a New System of Environmental Regulation: The Case lor an Industry Sector Approach."Environmental Law26.no. 2(1996): 457-88.
7. P. K.Howard. The Death of Common Sense: How Law is Suffocating America (New York: Random House. 1994).
8. EPA. Review of the Common Sense initiative: Two Year Review (Washington. DC: EPA. 1997).
9. PA Office of Policy.Economics, and Innovation. EPA sector Program Plan 2001-2005 (Washington. DC: EPA. 9 November 2000).
10. The Aspen Institute. The Alternative Path: A Cleaner. Cheaper Way to Protect and Enhance the Environment (Washington, DC, 1996)
11. Enterprise for the Environment. The Environmental Protection System in Transition: Toward a More Desirable Future (Washington. DC. 1998)
12. M. Landy, M.Roberts, and S. Thomas, The Environmental Protection Agency: Asking the Wrong Questions (Oxford University Press, 1994).
13. J.Freeman and L.Langhein, "Regulatory Negotiation and the Legitimacy Benefit"New York University Environmental Law Journal9(2001): 60.
14. C.Coglianese, "Is Satisfaction Success? Evaluating Public Participation in Regulatory Policy Making"in R. O'Leary and L. Bingham, eds. Evaluating Environmental and Public Policy Conflict Resolution Programs and Policies (Washington, DC: Resources for the Future Press, 2003).
15. C.Coglianese. "Assessing Consensus: The Promise and Performance of Negotiated Rulemaking,"Duke Law Journal461 1997: 1255
16. C. Coglianese, "Assessing the Advocacy of Negotiated Rulemaking,"New York University Environmental Law Journal9(2001): 386.
17. C.Coglianese and J.Nash. "Environmental Management Systems and the New Policy Agenda,"in C. Coglianese and J. Nash.eds. Regulating from the Inside: Can Environmental Management Systems Achieve Policy Goals? (Washington, DC: Resources for the Future Press, 2001).
18. N. A.Gunningham, R. A. Kagan, and D. Thornton, Shades of Green: Business, Regulation, and Environment (Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 2003).
19. V. Norberg-Bohm, Reforms in the US Environmental Policy System: First Steps Toward Stimulating Green Design and Manufacturing, draft paper. 28September 1998.