Spatial arrangement, density, and competition between barnyardgrass and tomato: I. Crop growth and yield

Weed Science

Volumn 49, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 61-68

  Norris, Robert F ^a   Elmore, Clyde L ^a   Rejmánek, Marcel ^a   Akey, William C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Interference; Thresholds; Weed suppression

Indexed keywords

EID: 0347386330     PISSN: 00431745     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1614/0043-1745(2001)049[0061:SADACB]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Auld, B. A. and C. A. Tisdell. 1988. Influence of spatial distribution of weeds on crop yield loss. Plant Prot. Quart. 3:81.
2. Bauer, T. A. and D. A. Mortensen. 1992. A comparison of economic and economic optimum thresholds for two annual weeds in soybeans. Weed Technol. 6:228-235.
3. Bhowmik, P. C. and K. N. Reddy. 1988. Effects of barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) on growth, yield, and nutrient status of transplanted tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). Weed Sci. 36:775-778.
4. Brain, P and R. Cousens. 1990. The effect of weed distribution on predictions of yield loss. J. Appl. Ecol. 27:735-742.
5. Cardina, J., D. H. Sparrow, and E. L. McCoy. 1995. Analysis of spatial distribution of common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) in notill soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 43:258-268.
6. Cousens, R. 1985a. A simple model relating yield loss to weed density. Ann. Appl. Biol. 107:239-252.
7. Cousens, R. 1985b. An empirical model relating crop yield to weed and crop density and a statistical comparison with other models. J. Agric. Sci. 105:513-521.
8. Dessaint, F., R. Chadoeuf, and G. Barralis. 1991. Spatial pattern analysis of weed seeds in the cultivated soil seed bank. J. Appl. Ecol. 28:721-730.
9. Garrett, K. A. 1993. The spatial pattern and area of influence of a plant competitor: a model of their impact on plant populations with implications for competition experiments. Bull. Ecol. Soc. Amer. 74:244.
10. Holm, L. G., D. L. Plucknett, J. V. Pancho, and J. P. Herberger. 1977. The World's Worst Weeds, Distribution and Biology. Honolulu, HA: University of Hawaii Press, pp. 32-40.
11. Hughes, G. 1988. Spatial heterogeneity in crop loss assessment models. Phytopath. 78:883-884.
12. Hunt, R. 1990. Basic Growth Analysis. London: Unwin Hyman, pp. 26, 42, and 60-61.
13. Johnson, G. A., D. A. Mortensen, and A. R. Martin. 1995. A simulation of herbicide use based on weed spatial distribution. Weed Res. 35: 197-205.
14. Lindquist, J. L., J. A. Dieleman, D. A. Mortensen, G. A. Johnson, and D. Y. Wyse-Pester. 1998. Economic importance of managing spatially heterogenous weed populations. Weed Technol. 12:7-13.
15. Marshall, E.J.P. 1988. Field scale estimates of grass weed populations in arable land. Weed Res. 28:191-198.
16. Mortensen, D. A., G. A. Johnson, and L. J. Young. 1995. Weed distribution in agricultural fields. Pages 113-124 in P. Robert and R. H. Rust, eds. Soil Specific Crop Management. Madison: Agronomy Society of America.
17. Norris, R. F., C. L. Elmore, M. Rejmánek, and W. C. Akey. 2001. Spatial arrangement, density, and competition between barnyardgrass and tomato: II. Barnyardgrass growth and seed production. Weed Sci. 49: 69-76.
18. Papadopoulos, A. P. and S. Pararajasingham. 1997. The influence of plant spacing on light interception and use in greenhouse tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.): A Review. Sci. Horti. 69:1-29.
19. Rejmánek, M., C. C. Bossard, G. R. Robinson, and A. M. Brown. 1992. The role of plant aggregation in interspecific competition. Bull. Ecol. Soc. Amer. 73:319.
20. Rejmánek, M., G. R. Robinson, and E. Rejmánkova. 1989. Weed-crop competition: experimental designs and models for data analyses. Weed Sci. 37:276-289.
21. Spitters, C.J.T. 1983. An alternative approach to analysis of mixed cropping experiments. I. Estimation of competition effects. Netherlands J. Agricul. Sci. 31:1-11.
22. Stauber, L. G., R. J. Smith, Jr., and R. E. Talbert. 1991. Density and spatial competition of barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) with rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Sci. 39:163-168.
23. Suehiro, K. and H. Ogawa. 1980. Competition between two annual herbs, Atriplex gmelini C.A. Mey. and Chenopodium album L., in mixed cultures irrigated with sea water of various concentrations. Oecologia 45: 167-177.
24. Thornton, P. K., R. H. Fawcett, J. B. Dent, and T. J. Perkins. 1990. Spatial weed distribution and economic thresholds for weed control. Crop Protect. 9:337-342.
25. [UC IPM] University of California Statewide Integrated Pest Management Project. 1990. Integrated Pest Management for Tomatoes. Oakland, CA: University of California, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources Publ. 3274. 104 p.
26. Van Gessel, M. J., E. E. Schweizer, K. A. Garrett, and P. Westra. 1995. Influence of weed density and distribution on corn (Zea mays) yield. Weed Sci. 43:215-218.
27. Van Groenendael, J. M. 1988. Patchy distribution of weeds and some implications for modeling population dynamics: a short literature review. Weed Res. 8:437-441.
28. Wiles, L. J., G. G. Wilkerson, and H. J. Gold. 1992a. Value of information about weed distribution for improving postemergence control decisions. Crop Protect. 11:547-554.
29. Wiles, L. J., G. G. Wilkerson, H. J. Gold, and H. D. Coble. 1992b. Modeling weed distribution for improved postemergence control decisions. Weed Sci. 40:456-553.
30. Zar, J. H. 1996. Biostatistical Analysis. 2nd. ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. 303 p.