Membrane bioreactors for final treatment of wastewater

Water Science and Technology

Volumn 48, Issue 8, 2003, Pages 103-110

  Galil, N I ^a   Sheindori, Ch ^b   Stahl, N ^c   Tenenbaum, A ^c   Levinsky, Y ^a  

^a TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Israel)

^b Environmental Protection Technologies   (Israel)

^c American Israeli Paper Mill ^*  (Israel)

Author keywords

Biological wastewater treatment; Membrane bioreactor; Paper mill

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; EFFLUENT TREATMENT; FLOTATION; NITRIFICATION; PAPER AND PULP MILLS; SEWAGE SLUDGE; WASTEWATER TREATMENT;

BIOLOGICAL PROCESSES; BIOSOLIDS TREATMENT;

BIOREACTORS;

ORGANIC MATTER;

BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT; BIOREACTOR; LIQUID-SOLID SEPARATION; MEMBRANE; REMOVAL; WASTEWATER TREATMENT;

ACTIVATED SLUDGE; ARTIFICIAL MEMBRANE; BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; BIOREACTOR; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONFERENCE PAPER; CONSTRUCTION WORK AND ARCHITECTURAL PHENOMENA; CONTROLLED STUDY; EFFLUENT; FILTRATION; INDUSTRIAL WASTE; METHODOLOGY; MICROBIOLOGY; NITRIFICATION; OSCILLATORY POTENTIAL; PAPER; PAPER INDUSTRY; SEWAGE; SUSPENDED PARTICULATE MATTER; TECHNOLOGY; WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER MANAGEMENT;

HEDERA;

EID: 0347380199     PISSN: 02731223     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2166/wst.2003.0458     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Blasczyc, R., Gardner, D. and Kosarik, N. (1994). Response and recovery of anaerobic granules from shock loading. Water Res., 28, 675-680.
2. Brindle, K. and Stephenson, T. (1996). Detoxification of industrial wastewaters in an extractive membrane bioreactor, Wat. Sci. Tech., 33(3), 1-8.
3. Bush, P.L. and Stumm, W. (1968). Chemical interactions in the aggregation of bacteria bioflocculation in waste treatment. Environ. Sci. Technol., 2, 48-53.
4. Casey, E., Glennon, B. and Hamer, G. (1992). Oxygen mass transfer characteristics in a membrane-aerated biofilm reactor. Biotech. and Bioeng., 62(2), 183-192.
5. Cheryan, M. (1998). Ultrafiltration and Microfiltration Handbook. Technion Pub. Co.
6. Dubois, M., Gilles, K.A., Hamilton, J.K. and Roberts, J.K. (1956). Colorimetric methods for determination of sugars and related substances. Analyt. Biochem., 28, 350.
7. Dufrense, R., Lavalee, H.C., Lebrun, R.E. and Lo-Sung-Niehl, (1998). Comparison of performance between membrane bioreactor and activated sludge system for the treatment of pulping process wastewaters. Tappi J., 81(4), 131-136.
8. Horan, N.J. and Eccles, C.R. (1986). Purification and characterization of extracellular polysaccharide from activated sludge. Water Res., 20, 1427-1432.
9. Ince, O., Anderson, G.K. and Kasapgil, B. (1996). Composition of the microbial population in a membrane anaerobic reactor system during start-up. Wat. Sci. Tech., 31(1), 1-10.
10. In-Soung, Chang and Chung-Hak Lee (1998). Membrane filtration characteristics in membrane-coupled activated sludge system - The effect of physiological states of activated sludge on membrane fouling. Desalination, 120, 221-233.
11. Kennicut, M.C. (1980). ATP as an indicator of toxicity. Water Res., 14, 325-328.
12. Peys, K., Diels, L., Leysen, R. and Vandecasteele, C. (1997). Development of a membrane biofilm reactor for the degradation of chlorinated aromatics. Wat. Sci. Tech., 36(1), 205-214.
13. Livingston, A.G., Freitas Dos Santos, L.M., Pavasant, P., Pistikopoulos, E.N. and Strachan, L.F. (1996). Detoxification of industrial wastewaters in an extractive membrane bioreactor. Wat. Sci. Tech., 33(3), 1-8.
14. Metcalf and Eddy (1991) Wastewater Engineering, Treatment, Disposal and Reuse. Third Ed., McGraw-Hill Inc.
15. Morgan, J.W., Forster, C.F. and Evison, L. (1990). Comparative study of the nature of biopolymers extracted from anaerobic and activated sludge. Wat. Res., 24, 743-750.
16. Pavoni, J.L. and Tenney, M.W. (1972). Bacterial exocellular polymers and biological flocculation. J. Wat. Pollut. Control Fed., 44, 414-431.
17. Rebhun, M. and Galil, N. (1988). Inhibition by hazardous compounds in an integral oil refinery. J. Wat. Pollut. Control Fed., 60, 1953-1959.
18. Rosich, A.F., Gaudy, A.F. and D'Adamo, P.C. (1985). Selection of growth rate model for activated sludge treating phenol. Wat. Res., 19, 481-490.
19. Rosenberg, M., Gutnic, D. and Rosenberg, E. (1980). Adherence of bacteria to hydrocarbons: A simple method for measuring cell surface hydrophobicity. FEMS Microbiol. Letters, 9, 29-33.
20. Saung-Goo Lee and Hak-Sung Kim (1993). Optimal operating policy of the ultrafiltration membrane bioreactor for enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose. Biotechnol. and Bioeng., 42(6), 737-746.
21. Sawada, T. and Nkamura, Y. (1987). Growth inhibitory and lethal effects of ethanol in E. Coli. Biotechnol. and Bioeng., 29, 742-746.
22. Schwartz-Mittelmann, A. (1997). Investigations of disturbances to bioflocculation caused by phenol. D.Sc. Thesis, Technion-IIT, Haifa Israel.
23. Sikkema, J., Poolman, B., Konings, W.M. and De Bont, J.A.M. (1992). Effects of the membrane action of the tetralin on the functional and structural properties of artificial and bacteria membranes. J. Bacteriol., 174, 2986-2992.
24. Starkey, J.E. and Karr, P.R. (1984). Effect of low dissolved oxygen concentration on effluent turbidity. J. WPCF, 56, 837-843.
25. Yao-Po, F., Ju-Si, W. and Zhao-Chun, J. (1998). Test of membrane bioreactor for wastewater treatment in a petrochemical complex. J. Environ. Science, 10(3), 1-9.