Developments of the evaluation system of government-supported research institutes in Korean science and technology

Research Evaluation

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 158-170

  Yi, Chan Goo ^a   Kang, Keun Bok ^b  

^a Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (ETRI)   (South Korea)

^b Chungnam National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0347370360     PISSN: 09582029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3152/147154400781777232     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. G Arvidsson (1986), 'Performance evaluation', in F-X Kaufmann et al (editors), Guidance, Control and Evaluation in the Public Sector (Walter de Gruyter, Berlin).
2. S Chung and H Grupp (1990), 'R&D policies in Germany and their evaluation: R&D promotion policies and evaluation approaches', STEPI, Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 2(1/2), pages 141-167.
3. T D Cook and C L Gruder (1978), 'Metaevaluation', Evaluation Quarterly, 2(1), pages 5-51.
4. J De Bandt (1995), 'Research and innovation: evaluation problems and procedures at different levels', International Journal of Technology Management, 10(4/5/6), pages 365-377.
5. ETRI (1995), The History of 17Years in ETRI, Taejon, Korea.
6. ETRI (1998a), Annual Report, Taejon, Korea.
7. ETRI (1998b), Evaluation Manual of Researcher, Project and Unit, Taejon, Korea.
8. ETRI (1998c), Evaluation Report of Researcher, Project and Unit, Taejon, Korea.
9. ETRI (1999a), Annual Report, Taejon, Korea.
10. ETRI (1999b), Evaluation Manual of Researcher, Project and Unit, Taejon, Korea.
11. ETRI (1999c), Evaluation Report of Researcher, Project and Unit, Taejon, Korea.
12. E Geisler (1994), 'Key output indicators in performance evaluation of research and development organization', Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 47, pages 189-203.
13. L Georghiou (1989), 'Organization of evaluation', in D Evered and S Harnett (editors), The Evaluation of Scientific Research (Ciba Foundation Research Conference) (John Wiley and Sons, Chichester), pages 16-31.
14. E N Goldenberg (1983), The three faces of evaluation', Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 2(4), pages 515-525.
15. J Hudson, J Mayne and R Thomlison (editors) (1992), Action-oriented Evaluation in Organization: Canadian Practices (Wall and Emerson, Toronto, Ontario).
16. B Jenkins (1993), 'Policy analysis: models and approaches', in H Michael (editor), The Policy Process: A Reader (Harvester Wheatsheaf, London).
17. M S Kim (1993), Public Policy Evaluation (Bakyoung-Sa, Seoul, Korea).
18. R N Kostoff (1994), 'Quantitative/qualitative federal research impact evaluation practices', Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 45, pages 189-205.
19. J F Larson (1995), The Telecommunications Revolution in Korea (Oxford University Press, Hong Kong).
20. R Larson and L Berliner (1983), 'On Evaluating Evaluations', Policy Sciences, 16(2), pages 147-163.
21. J J Lee et al (1990), A Study on the Development and Implementation of R&D Evaluation Model (ETRI Report, Taejon, Korea).
22. J J Lee and K S Suh (1996), A New Model for the Assessment of Policy Reform (Nanam Publishing House, Seoul, Korea).
23. L J Lee and J F Sampson (1990), 'A practical approach to program evaluation', Evaluation and Program Planning, 13, pages 157-164.
24. M S Lee et al (1994), 'A study on an effective evaluation system for national R&D projects', Korean Management Review, 23(Special), pages 193-227.
25. McKinsey and Company (1998), Consulting Report on the R&D Process Management of GRIs: Group A (Seoul, Korea).
26. F Meyer-Krahmer (1995), 'Technology Policy Evaluation in Germany', International Journal of Technology Management, 10(4/5/6), pages 601-621.
27. R Miller (1992), 'The influence of primary task on R&D laboratory evaluation: a comparative bibliometry analysis', R&D Management, 22(1), pages 3-20.
28. (Mirae Management Development Institute) (1999), Consulting Report on the ETRI (Seoul, Korea).
29. MOST (Ministry of Science and Technology of Korea) (1998), Special Law for Scientific and Technological Innovation (Seoul, Korea).
30. MOST (1999), Law concerning the Establishment, Operation, and Development of Government-supported Research Institutes (GRIs) (Seoul, Korea).
31. Y S Mun (1997), 'Meta evaluation on the central review: evaluation system of the Korean administrative', Korean Public Administration Quarterly, 9(2), pages 231-255.
32. M Nyden (1992), 'Evaluation of R&D in Sweden', in J Mayne et al (editors), Advancing Public Policy Evaluation: Learning from International Experiences (North-Holland, Amsterdam), pages 159-171.
33. OECD (1987), Evaluation of Research: A Selection of Current Practices (Paris).
34. OECD (1996), Reviews of National Science and Technology Policy: Republic of Korea (Paris).
35. The Prime Minister of Japan (1997), National Guideline on the Method of Evaluation for Government R&D (Tokyo).
36. P H Rossi and H E Freeman (1993), Evaluation: A Systematic Approach (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, California).
37. D Stufflebeam (1981), 'Metaevaluation: concept, standard, and uses', in Ronald A. Berk (editor), Educational Evaluation Methodology (The Johns Hopkins University Press, pages 146-163.
38. E Vedung (1997), Public Policy and Program Evaluation (Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick).
39. A M Weinberg (1989), 'Criteria for evaluation: a generation later', in D Evered and S Harnett (editors), The Evaluation of Scientific Research (Ciba Foundation Research Conference) (John Wiley and Sons, Chichester), pages 3-15.
40. C G Yi, K B Kang and S H Yoon (1998), 'Metaevaluation on the information and communications R&D program in Korea', Proceedings of Second International Conference on Technology Policy and Innovation, Lisbon, Portugal, August 3-5, 1998, pages 21.4.1.-21.4.9.