Self-reported drug use and urinalysis results

Indian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology

Volumn 48, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 101-105

  Jain, Raka ^a  

^a ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (India)

Author keywords

GLC; Opioid dependence; Self report; Substance abuse; TLC; Urine

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG ABUSE; HUMAN; MALE; PREDICTION; PRESCRIPTION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SELF REPORT; URINALYSIS;

ADULT; BUPRENORPHINE; CHROMATOGRAPHY, GAS; CHROMATOGRAPHY, THIN LAYER; DIAZEPAM; HUMANS; HYPNOTICS AND SEDATIVES; INDICATORS AND REAGENTS; MALE; MORPHINE; OPIOID-RELATED DISORDERS; PROPOXYPHENE; SUBSTANCE ABUSE DETECTION; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS;

EID: 0347360487     PISSN: 00195499     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Maddux JF, Desmond DP. Reliability and validity of information from chronic heroin users. J Psychiatry Research 1975; 12: 87-95.
2. Bale RN, Vanstone WW, Engelsing TM, Zarcone VP, Kuldau JM, Jr. The validity of self-reported heroin use. International Journal of Addiction 1981; 16: 1387-1398.
3. Magura S, Goldsmith D, Casriel C, Goldstein PJ, Lipton DS. The validity of methadone clients' self reported drug use. Int J Addict 1987; 28: 727-749.
4. Martin GW, Wilkinson DA, Kapur BM. Validation of self-reported cannabis use by urine analysis. Addictive Behav 1988; 13: 147-150.
5. Maisto SA, McKay JR, Connors GJ. Self-reported issues in substance abuse: State of the art and future directions. Behav Assessment 1990; 2: 117-134.
6. Sherman MF, Bigelow GE. Validity of patients' self-reported use as a function of treatment status. Drug Alcohol Depend 1992; 30: 1-11.
7. Harrison L, Hughes A, editors. The validity of self-reported drug use: Improving the accuracy of survey estimates. NIDA Research Monograph 167. National Institute on Drug Abuse, Maryland 1997.
8. Darke S. Self-report among injecting drug users: a review. Drug Alcohol Depend 1998; 51: 253-263.
9. Brown J, Kranzler HR, Del Boca FK. Self-reports by alcohol and drug abuse in-patients: factors affecting reliability and validity. Br J Addiction 1992; 87: 1013-1024.
10. Digiusto E, Seres V, Bibby A, Batey R. Concordance between urinalysis results and self-reported drug use by methadone maintenance in Australia. Addict Behavior 1996; 21: 319-329.
11. Simpson D, Greenwood J, Jarvie DR, Moore FM. Experience of a laboratory service for drug screening in urine. Scot Med J 1993; 38: 20-26.
12. WHO (1992). The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders. Clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines. Oxford University Press, Delhi.
13. Jain R. Simplified method for simultaneous determination of diazepam and its metabolites by urine by thin layer chromatography and direct densitometry. J Chromotogr 1993; 615: 365-368.
14. Jain R. Analytical methods. In: Jain R, editor. Detection of drugs of abuse in body fluids: A manual for laboratory personnel. Drug Dependence Treatment Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India 1998; 18-44.
15. Jain R. Utility of thin layer chromatography for detection of opioids and benzodiazepines in a clinical setting. Addict Behavior 2000; 25: 451-454.
16. BPMD Statistical software, Inc. Boulevard Suite 316, Losangeles, CA, 90025, 1992.
17. Skog OJ. The validity of self-reported drug use. Br J Addict 1992; 87: 539-548.
18. Kilpatrick B, Howlett M, Sedgwick A, Ghodse AH. Drug use, self-report and urinalysis. Drug Alcohol Depend 2000; 58: 111-116.
19. Jain R, Dhawan A, Kumar R, Ray R, Singh R. Patients in treatment Centres: Are they all dependents. Ind J Pharmacol 2001; 43: 327-329.
20. Jain R, Tripathi BM., Singh R. Comparison of reported drug use and urinalysis in the assessment of drug use. Natl Med J India 2001; 14: 176.