Relative sensitivity distribution of aquatic invertebrates to organic and metal compounds

Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 150-156

  Von Der Ohe, Peter Carsten ^a   Liess, Matthias ^a  

^a HELMHOLTZ CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH UFZ   (Germany)

Author keywords

Daphnia magna; Invertebrates; Relative sensitivity distribution; Risk assessment; Toxicity

Indexed keywords

COMPOSITION; ORGANIC COMPOUNDS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; TOXIC MATERIALS;

INVERTEBRATES; SPECIES;

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION;

METAL DERIVATIVE; ORGANIC COMPOUND; TOXIC SUBSTANCE;

AQUATIC ORGANISM; INVERTEBRATE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; TOXICITY;

AMPHIPODA; ANNELID WORM; AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT; ARTICLE; BASOMMATOPHORA; CLADOCERA; COLEOPTERA; CRUSTACEA; DAPHNIA; DECAPODA (CRUSTACEA); EPHEMEROPTERA; EULAMELLIBRANCHIATA; FLY; HETEROPTERA; HIRUDINEA; INVERTEBRATE; ISOPODA; MESOCOSM; NONHUMAN; ORDO; PLECOPTERA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSOBRANCHIA; SPECIES COMPOSITION; TAXON; TOXICITY TESTING; TRICHOPTERA; TRICLADIDA; YARROWIA; ZYGOPTERA;

ANIMALS; DAPHNIA; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; INVERTEBRATES; LETHAL DOSE 50; METALS, HEAVY; ORGANIC CHEMICALS; POPULATION DYNAMICS; REFERENCE VALUES; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; WATER POLLUTANTS, CHEMICAL;

AMPHIPODA; ANIMALIA; ANNELIDA; BASOMMATOPHORA; CLADOCERA; COLEOPTERA; CRUSTACEA; DAPHNIA; DAPHNIA MAGNA; DAPHNIIDAE; DECAPODA (CRUSTACEA); DIPTERA; EPHEMEROPTERA; HETEROPTERA; HIRUDINEA; INVERTEBRATA; ISOPODA; PLECOPTERA; PROSOBRANCHIA; TRICHOPTERA; TRICLADIDA; YARROWIA; ZYGOPTERA;

EID: 0347359297     PISSN: 07307268     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1897/02-577     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Posthuma L, Suter GW, Traas TP, eds. 2002. Species Sensitivity Distributions in Ecotoxicology. Lewis, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
2. Koivisto S. 1995. Is Daphnia magna an ecologically representative zooplankton species in toxicity tests? Environ Pollut 90:263-267.
3. Campbell PJ, Arnold DJS, Brock TCM, Grandy NJ, Heger W, Heimbach F, Maund SJ, Streloke M. 1999. Guidance Document on Higher-tier Aquatic Risk Assessment for Pesticides (HARAP). SETAC Europe, Brussels, Belgium.
4. Wogram J, Liess M. 2001. Rank ordering of macroinvertebrate species sensitivity to toxic compounds by comparison with that of Daphnia magna. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 67:360-367.
5. Liess M, Schulz R, Berenzen N, Nanko-Drees J, Wogram J. 2001. Pflanzenschutzmittel-Belastung und Lebensgemeinschaften in Fliesgewässern mit landwirtschaftlich genutztem Umland. Texte 65/2001. UBA Texte, Berlin, Germany.
6. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2002. AQUIRE (Aquatic toxicity information retrieval database). National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Duluth, MN.
7. Schaefer M. 1992. Brohmer-Fauna von Deutschland, ein Bestimmungsbuch unserer heimischen Tierwelt. Quelle & Meyer Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany.
8. Illies J. 1978. Limnofauna Europaea, A Compilation of the European Freshwater Species with Emphasis on their Distribution and Ecology. G. Fischer, Jena, Germany.
9. Leahey JP. 1985. The Pyrethroid Insecticides. Taylor & Francis, London, UK.
10. Mian LS, Mulla MS. 1992. Effects of pyrethroid insecticides on nontarget invertebrates in aquatic ecosystems. Journal of Agricultural Entomology 9:73-98.
11. Maund SJ, Hamer MJ, Warinton JS, Kedwards TJ. 1998. Aquatic ecotoxicology of the pyrethroid insecticide λ-cyhalothrin: Considerations for higher-tier aquatic risk assessment. Pest Sci 54:408-417.
12. Roshon RD, McCann JH, Thompson DG, Stephenson GR. 1999. Effects of seven forestry management herbicides on Myriophyllum sibiricum, as compared with other nontarget aquatic organisms. Can J For Res 29:1158-1169.
13. Versteeg DJ, Belanger SE, Carr GJ. 1999. Understanding single-species and model ecosystem sensitivity: Data-based comparison. Environ Toxicol Chem 18:1329-1346.
14. Guerold F. 2000. Influence of taxonomic determination level on several community indices. Water Res 34:487-492.
15. Hoekstra JA, Vaal MA, Notenboom J, Slooff W. 1994. Variation in the sensitivity of aquatic species to toxicants. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 53:98-105.
16. Brock TCM. 2000. Ecological risks of pesticides in freshwater ecosystems. Part 2: Insecticides. Alterra-Rapport 089. Alterra-Green World Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
17. European Commission. 2002. Guidance document on aquatic ecotoxicology in the frame of the Directive 91/414/EEC. Working Document of the European Commission 8075/VI/97 rev 9. European Commission, Brussels, Belgium.
18. Lowell RB, Culp JM. 1999. Cumulative effects of multiple effluent and low dissolved oxygen stressors on mayflies at cold temperatures. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 56:1624-1630.
19. Van der Geest HG, Soppe WJ, Greve GD, Kroon A, Kraak MHS. 2002. Combined effects of lowered oxygen and toxicants (copper and diazinon) on the mayfly Ephoron virgo. Environ Toxicol Chem 21:431-436.
20. Liess M, Champeau O, Riddle M, Schulz R, Duquesne S. 2001. Combined effects of ultraviolet-B radiation and food shortage on the sensitivity of the Antarctic amphipod Paramoera walkeri to copper. Environ Toxicol Chem 20:2088-2092.
21. Van den Brink PJ, Van Wijngaarden RPA, Lucassen WGH, Brock TCM, Leeuwangh P, 1996. Effects of the insecticide Dursban® 4E active ingredient chlorpyrifos in outdoor experimental ditches: II. Invertebrate community response and recovery. Environ Toxicol Chem 15:1143-1153.
22. Liess M, Schulz R. 1999. Linking insecticide contamination and population response in an agricultural stream. Environ Toxicol Chem 18:1948-1955.