Hostility, Interpersonal Interactions, and Ambulatory Blood Pressure

Psychosomatic Medicine

Volumn 65, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 1003-1011

  Brondolo, Elizabeth ^a,c   Rieppi, Ricardo ^a   Erickson, Stephanie A ^a   Bagiella, Emilia ^b   Shapiro, Peter A ^b   McKinley, Paula ^d   Sloan, Richard P ^b  

^a John's University   (United States)

^b Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^c ST JOHN'S UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d NONE

Author keywords

Ambulatory blood pressure; Hostility; Interpersonal interactions; Reactivity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMBULATORY MONITORING; ARTICLE; BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; DIASTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; FEMALE; HOSTILITY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE;

EID: 0347356443     PISSN: 00333174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.PSY.0000097329.53585.A1     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Miller TQ, Smith TW, Turner CW, et al. A meta-analytic review of research on hostility and physical health. Psych Bull 1996;119:322-348.
2. Whiteman MC, Deary IJ, Fowkes FGR. Personality and health: Cardiovascular disease. In: Hampson SE, ed. Advances in personality psychology. Philadelphia, PA: Taylor & Francis; 2000:157-198.
3. Smith TW. Hostility and health: Current status of a psychosomatic hypothesis. Health Psychol 1992;11:139-150.
4. Cohen S, Kaplan J, Manuck S. Social and coronary heart disease: Underlying psychological and biological mechanisms. In: Shumaker S, Czaijkowski S, eds. Social support and cardiovascular disease. New York: Plenum Press; 1994.
5. Sloan RP, Shapiro PA, Bagiella E, et al. Cardiac autonomic control buffers blood pressure variability responses to challenge: A psychophysiologic model of coronary artery disease. Psychosom Med 1999;61:58-68.
6. Williams RB, Barefoot JC, Shekelle RB. The health consequences of hostility. In: Chesney MA, Rosenman RH, editors. Anger and hostility in cardiovascular and behavioral disorders. Washington, DC: Hemisphere; 1985:173-185.
7. Barefoot JC, Dahlstrom WG, Williams RB, et al. Incidence, and total mortality: A 25-year follow-up study of 255 physicians. Psychosom Med 1983;45:59-63.
8. Brondolo E, Masheb R, Stores J, et al. Anger-related traits and response to interpersonal conflict among NYC Traffic Agents. J Appl Soc Psychol 1998;28:2089-2118.
9. Hardy JD, Smith TW. Cynical hostility and vulnerability to disease: Social support, life stress, and physiological response to conflict. Health Psychol 1988;7:447-459.
10. Houston BK, Kelly KE. Hostility in employed women: Relation to work and marital experience, social support, stress, and anger expression. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 1989;15:175-182.
11. Scherwitz L, Perkins L, Chesney M, et al. Cook-Medley Hostility Scale and subsets: Relationship to demographic and psychosocial characteristics in young adults in the CARD1A study. Psychosom Med 1991;53:36-49.
12. Smith TW, Frohm KD. What's so unhealthy about hostility? Construct validity and psychosocial correlates of the Cook and Medley Hostility Scale. Health Psychol 1985;4:503-520.
13. Smith TW, Pope MK, Sanders JD, et al. Cynical hostility at home and work: Psychosocial vulnerability across domains. J Res Pers 1988;22:525-548.
14. Suarez EC, Williams RB. Situational determinants of cardiovascular and emotional reactivity in high and low hostile men. Psychosom Med 1989;51:404-418.
15. Suarez EC, Williams RB. The relationship between dimensions of hostility and cardiovascular reactivity as a function of task characteristics. Psychosom Med 1990;52:558-570.
16. Christensen AJ, Smith TW. Cynical hostility, self-disclosure, and cardiovascular reactivity. Psychosom Med 1993;55:193-202.
17. Powch IG, Houston BK. Hostility, anger, in and cardiovascular reactivity in white women. Health Psychol 1996;15:200-208.
18. Smith TW, Allred KD. Blood pressure responses during social interaction in high and low cynically hostile males. J Behav Med 1989;12:135-143.
19. Allred KD, Smith TW. Social cognition in cynical hostility. Cogn Ther Res 1991;15(5):399-412.
20. Diamond EL, Schneiderman N, Schwartz D, et al. Harassment, hostility, and Type A as determinants of cardiovascular reactivity during competition. J Behav Med 1984;7(2):171-189.
21. Glass DC, Lake CR, Contrada RJ, et al. Stability of individual differences in physiological responses to stress. Health Psychol 1983;2(4):317-341.
22. Kamarck TW, Manuck SB, Jennings JR. Social support reduces cardiovascular reactivity to psychological challenge: A laboratory model. Psychosom Med 1990;52:42-58.
23. Fredrickson BL, Maynard KE, Helms MJ, et al. Hostility predicts magnitude and duration of blood pressure response to anger. J Behav Med 2000;23(3):229-243.
24. Jamner LD, Shapiro D, Ka Kit H, et al. Hostility and differences between clinic, self-determined, and ambulatory blood pressure. Psychosom Med 1993;55:203-211.
25. Jamner LD, Shapiro K, Goldstein IB, et al. Ambulatory blood pressure and heart rate in paramedics: Effects of cynical hostility and defensiveness. Psychosom Med 1991;53:393-406.
26. Shapiro D, Jamner LD, Goldstein IB. Ambulatory stress psychophysiology: The study of "compensatory and defensive counterforces" and conflict in a natural setting. Psychosom Med 1993;55:309-323.
27. Shapiro D, Jamner LD, Goldstein IB. Daily mood states and ambulatory blood pressure. Psychophysiology 1997;34:399-405.
28. Raikkonen K, Matthews K, Flory J, et al. Effects of hostility on ambulatory blood pressure and mood during daily living in healthy adults. Health Psychol 1999;18:44-53.
29. Ewart CK, Kolondner KB. Negative affect, and expressive style predict elevated ambulatory blood pressure in adolescents. J Pers Soc Psychol 1994;66:596-605.
30. Guyll M, Contrada RJ. Trait hostility and ambulatory caridiovascular activity responses to social interaction. Health Psychol 1998;17:30-39.
31. Linden W, Chambers L, Maurice J, et al. Sex differences in social support, self-deception, hostility, and ambulatory cardiovascular activity. Health Psychol 1993;12:376-380.
32. Polk DE, Kamarck TW, Shiffman SM. Hostility explains some of the discrepancy between daytime ambulatory and clinic blood pressure. Health Psychol 2002;21:202-206.
33. Shapiro D, Janmer LD, Goldstein IB. Effects of cynical hostility, anger out, anxiety, and defensiveness on ambulatory blood pressure in Black and White college students. Psychosom Med 1996;58:354-364.
34. Benotsch EG, Christensen AJ, McKelvey L. Hostility, social support, and ambulatory cardiovascular activity. J Behav Med 1997;20:163-177.
35. Ohira T, Tanigawa T, Iso H, et al. Effects of shift work on 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure and its variability among Japanese workers. Scand J Work Environ Health 2000;26:421-426.
36. Helmers KF, Baker B, O'Kelly B, et al. Anger expression, gender, and ambulatory blood pressure in mild, unmedicated adults with hypertension. Ann Behav Med 2000;22:60-64.
37. Brondolo E, Karlin W, Alexander K, et al. Workday communication and ambulatory blood pressure: Implications for the reactivity hypothesis. Psychophysiology 1999;36:86-94.
38. Brondolo E. Anger-related traits and ambulatory blood pressure responses among NYC Traffic Agents. Chaired symposium at the Eighteenth Annual Meetings of the Society of Behavioral Medicine. April 1997, San Francisco, CA.
39. Contrada RJ, Jussim L. What does the Cook-Medley hostility scale measure? In search of an adequate measurement model. J Appl Soc Psychol 1992;22:615-627.
40. Barefoot JC, Dodge KA, Peterson BL, et al. The Cook-Medley Hostility scale. Item content and ability to predict survival. Psychosom Med 1989;51:46-57.
41. White WB, Schulman P, McGabe EJ, et al. Clinical validation of the Accutracker, a novel ambulatory blood pressure monitor using R-wave gating for Korsotkoff sounds. J Clin Hypertens 1987;3:500-509.
42. Cook WW, Medley DM. Proposed hostility and Pharasaic-virtue scales for the MMPI. J Appl Psychol 1954;38:441-418.
43. Shekelle RB, Gale M, Ostfelf AM, et al. Hostility, risk of coronary heart disease and mortality. Psychosom Med 1983;45:109-114.
44. Houston BK, Vavak CR. Hostility. Developmental factors, psychological correlates, and health behaviors. Health Psychol 1991;10:9-17.
45. Littell RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WWW, et al. SAS system for mixed models. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc 1996;.
46. Bagiella E, Sloan R, Heitjan DM. Mixed-effects models in psychophysiology. Psychophysiology 2000;37:13-20.
47. Brondolo E, Rosen RC, Kostis JB, et al. Relationship of physical symptoms and mood to perceived and actual blood pressure in hypertensive men: A repeated-measures design. Psychosom Med 1999;61:311-318.
48. Schwartz J, Stone A. Strategies for analyzing ecological momentary assessment data. Health Psychol 1998;17:6-16.
49. Wolfinger RD, Chang M. Comparing SAS GLM and MIXED procedures for repeated measures. SAS User's Group International Conference Proceeding SUG1 1995;20:1172-1182.
50. Clark L, Denby L, Pregibon D. Data analysis of ABP readings: Before p values. In: Schneiderman N, Weiss S, Kaufman P, eds. Handbook of research methods in cardiovascular behavioral medicines. New York: Plenum Press; 1989:333-345.
51. Schwartz GE, Warren K, Pickering TG. Mood, location, and physical position as predictors of ambulatory blood pressure and heart rate: Applications of a multi-level random effects model. Ann Behav Med 1994;16:210-220.
52. Lynch JJ, Thomas SA, Long JM, et al. Human speech and blood pressure. J Nerv Ment Dis 1980;168:526-534.
53. Lynch JJ, Long JM, Thomas SA, et al. The effects of talking on blood pressure of hypertensive and normotensive individuals. Psychosom Med 1981;43:25-33.
54. Lynch JJ. The language of the heart: The body's response to human dialogue. New York: Basic Books; 1985.
55. Sloan RP, Bagiella E, Shapiro PA, et al. Hostility, gender, and cardiac autonomic control. Psychosom Med 2001;63:434-440.
56. Linden W, Earle T, Gerin W, et al. Physiological stress reactivity and recovery: Conceptual siblings separated at birth? J Psychosom Res 1997; 42:117-135.
57. Lepore SJ. Problems and prospects for the social support-reactivity hypothesis. Ann Behav Med 1998;20:257-269.