Prescription of technical aids by general practitioners in the Netherlands

Health Policy

Volumn 67, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 107-113

  Biermans, M C J ^a   Dekker, J ^b   Van Den Ende, C H M ^a  

^a NETHERLANDS INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH   (Netherlands)

^b VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Diagnosis; Family physicians; General practitioners; Self help devices; Technical aids; The Netherlands

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM; DATA ANALYSIS; DEMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM; NETHERLANDS; PRESCRIPTION; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; SEX DIFFERENCE; TECHNICAL AID; URINARY TRACT;

EID: 0347355432     PISSN: 01688510     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0168-8510(02)00216-6     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. International Organization for Standardization. International Standard. Technical aids for disabled persons - Classification. ISO 9999: 1997 (E/F). Genève: ISO, 1997.
2. De Wit J.C. Monitor hulpmiddelen, mei. 2001;2001 College voor zorgverzekeringen, Amstelveen.
3. Hartings R.C.P.K.K., Scheffer D. Medische hulpmiddelen in beeld. Een internationale vergelijking van de kosten- en beleidsontwikkeling inzake medische hulpmiddelen. 2000;Management & ICT Consultants, Leusden.
4. Raad voor de Volksgezondheid en Zorg. Medische hulpmiddelen. Zoetermeer: Raad voor de Volksgezondheid en Zorg, 1997. ISBN 9057320231.
5. Sonn U., Grimby G. Assistive devices in an elderly population studied at 70 and 76 years of age. Disability and Rehabilitation. 16:(2):1994;85-92.
6. De Klerk MMY. Het gebruik van ADL-hulpmiddelen door ouderen: een onderzoek naar determinanten en substitutiemogelijkheden. Dissertation 1997, Erasmus Universiteit, Rotterdam. ISBN 90-9010287-6.
7. Grady J.H. Hulpmiddelen: stand van zaken en nieuwe ontwikkelingen. Schrijvers A.J.P., Stevens P.G.J.J., Crebolder H.F.J.M. Handboek Thuiszorg. 1994;VUGA, The Hague.
8. Stephanidis C., Vernardakis N., Akoumianakis D. The demand, supply and provision system of the rehabilitation technology market in Europe: a modelling perspective. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research. 17:(4):1994;343-356.
9. Regeling hulpmiddelen 1996. Staatscourant 1995;8-14.
10. Borst-Eilers E., Vliegenthart A.M. Zorgnota. 2000;2001 Sdu Uitgevers, The Hague. ISBN 9012091845.
11. Bartelds A.I.M., Fracheboud J., Van der Zee J. The Dutch sentinel practice network: relevance for public health policy. Studies from the continuous morbidity registration sentinel stations The Netherlands. 1989;NIVEL, Utrecht. ISBN 9069051095.
12. Bartelds A.I.M. Continuous morbidity registration sentinel stations The Netherlands. 1999;2001 Nivel, Utrecht. ISBN 90-6905-515-5.
13. Lamberts H., Wood M. International classification of primary care (ICPC). 1987;Oxford University Press, Oxford. ISBN 0-19-261633-1.
14. Altman D.G. Practical statistics for medical research. 1997;Chapman & Hall, London. ISBN 0 412 27630 5.
15. Van der Velden K. General practice at work. Its contribution to epidemiology and health policy. Dissertation 1999, Erasmus Universiteit, Rotterdam. ISBN 90-6905-436-1.
16. Biermans M.C.J., Dekker J., Bartelds A.I.M., Van den Ende C.H.M. Het voorschrijven van hulpmiddelen door de huisarts. 2000;NIVEL, Utrecht. ISBN 90-6905-471-x.
17. Scherer M.J. The change in emphasis from people to person: introduction to the special issue on assistive technology. Disability and Rehabilitation. 24:(1-3):2002;1-4.