Drift based damage functions for reinforced concrete columns

Computers and Structures

Volumn 82, Issue 2-3, 2004, Pages 121-130

  Erduran, Emrah ^a   Yakut, Ahmet ^a  

^a MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Column; Damage curves; Damage index; Drift ratio; Reinforced concrete; Vulnerability

Indexed keywords

COLUMNS (STRUCTURAL); DEGRADATION; DUCTILITY; EARTHQUAKES; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; LOADS (FORCES); NUMERICAL METHODS; PERFORMANCE; SEISMIC WAVES; STIFFNESS;

AXIAL LOADS; DRIFT RATIO;

REINFORCED CONCRETE;

EID: 0347355138     PISSN: 00457949     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2003.10.003     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Park Y., Ang A.H.S. Mechanistic seismic damage model for reinforced concrete. ASCE J. Struct. Div. 111:1985;722-739.
2. Applied Technology Council, ATC-40, Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings, California. 1996.
3. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), 1997, NEHRP Guidelines for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, FEMA 273.
4. Kishi N, Yakut A, Byeon J. Advanced component method (ACM) - An objective methodology for the assessment of building vulnerability. In: Proceedings of Second Asian Symposium on Risk Assessment and Management, Kobe University, 23-25 November 2001. p. 88-97.
5. Azizinamini, et al. Effects of transverse reinforcement on seismic performance of columns. ACI Struct. J. 89:1992;442-450.
6. Priestly M.J.N., Kowalsky M.J. Aspects of drift and ductility capacity of rectangular cantilever structural walls. Bull. New Zealand Nat. Soc. Earthquake Eng. 31(6):1998;73-85.
7. Paulay T. An estimation of displacement limits for ductile systems. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 31:2002;583-599.
8. Taylor AW, Kuo C, Wellenius K, Chung D. A summary of cyclic lateral load tests on rectangular concrete columns. National Technical Information Service Report NISTIR-5984, Gaithersburg, January 1997.
9. Barbosa AF, Ribeiro GO. Analysis of reinforced concrete structures using ANSYS nonlinear concrete model. Computational Mechanics: New Trends and Applications, Barcelona, Spain, 1998.
10. Kent D.C., Park R. Flexural members with confined concrete. ASCE J. Struct. Div. 97:1971;ST 7.
11. Lam S.S.E., Wu B., Wong Y.L., Wang Z.Y., Liu Z.Q., Li C.S. Drift capacity of rectangular reinforced concrete columns with low lateral confinement and high axial load. ASCE J. Struct. Eng. 129:2003;733-742.
12. Frosch R.J. Another look at cracking and crack control in reinforced concrete. ACI Struct. J. 96:1999;437-442.
13. Ohkubo M. Current Japanese system on seismic capacity and retrofit techniques for existing reinforced concrete buildings and post-earthquake damage inspection and restoration techniques, Report No. SSRP-91/02, University of California, San Diego, May 1991.
14. Sozen M. Review of earthquake response of R.C. buildings with a view to drift control, state-of-the-art in earthquake engineering. In: 7th WCEE, Istanbul, September 1980. p. 383-418.