The use of accessibility in defining sub-groups of small mammals from point sampled data

Computers, Environment and Urban Systems

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 71-83

  Pacock, M J O ^a   White, P C L ^a   McClean, C J ^a   Searle, J B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Accessibility; Buffering; Capture mark recapture; Fragmented population; Geographic information system; House mouse; Mus musculus domesticus

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; DATA REDUCTION; ECOLOGY; SAMPLING;

SMALL MAMMALS;

POPULATION STATISTICS;

ACCESSIBILITY; BUFFERING; GIS; MAMMAL; SAMPLING;

MAMMALIA; MUS; MUS MUSCULUS; MUS MUSCULUS DOMESTICUS; MUSCULUS;

EID: 0347298793     PISSN: 01989715     EISSN: None     Source Type: Trade Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0198-9715(01)00037-0     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Barrett, G. W., & Peles, J. D. (1999). Landscape ecology of small mammals. New York: Springer.
2. Berry, R. J. (1991). House mouse Mus domesticus. In G. B. Corbet, & S. Harris (Eds.), Handbook of British mammals (pp. 239-247). Oxford: Blackwell Scientific.
3. Bibby, P., & Shepherd, J. (1999). Monitoring land cover and land-use for urban and regional planning. In P. A. Longley, M. F. Goodchild, D. J. Maguire, & D. W. Rhind (Eds.), Geographical information systems. Volume 2: management issues and applications (pp. 953-965). New York: Wiley.
4. Buckland, S. T., Goudie, I. B. J., & Borchers, D. L. (2000). Wildlife population assessment: past developments and future directions. Biometrics, 56, 1-12.
5. Burrough, P. A., & McDonnell, R. A. (1998). Principles of geographic information systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6. Butler, R. G. (1980). Population size, social behaviour, and dispersion in house mice: a quantitative investigation. Animal Behaviour, 28, 78-85.
7. Dixon, K. R., & Chapman, J. A. (1980). Harmonic mean measure of animal activity areas. Ecology, 61, 1040-1044.
8. Flowerdew, J. R. (1976). Ecological methods. Mammal Review, 6, 123-159.
9. Gatrell, A., & Senoir, M. (1999). Health and health care implications. In P. A. Longley, M. F. Goodchild, D. J. Maguire, & D. W. Rhind (Eds.), Geographical information systems. Volume 2: management issues and applications (pp. 925-938). New York: Wiley.
10. Greenwood, J. J. D. (1996). Basic techniques. In W. J. Sutherland (Ed.), Ecological census techniques. A handbook (pp. 11-110). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Gurnell, J., & Flowerdew, J. R. (1982). Live trapping small mammals. A practical guide. Reading, Berkshire: The Mammal Society.
12. Hagerstrand, T. (1957). Migration and area: survey of a sample of Swedish migration .elds and hypothetical considerations of their genesis. Lund Studies in Geography, Series B, Human Geography, 13, 27-158.
13. Haggett, P. (1965). Locational analysis in human geography. London: Edward Arnold.
14. Hansen, W. G. (1959). How accessibility shapes land use. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 25, 73-76.
15. Hanski, I. (1999). Metapopulation ecology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16. Harris, S., Cresswell, W. J., Forde, P. G., Trewhella, W. J., Woollard, T., & Wray, S. (1990). Home-range analysis using radio-tracking data-a review of the problems and techniques particularly as applied to the study of mammals. Mammal Review, 20, 97-123.
17. Hart, C. A., Trees, A. J., & Duerden, B. I. (1997). Zoonoses. Journal of Medical Microbiology, 46, 4-33.
18. Horn, M. (1999). GIS and the geography of politics. In P. A. Longley, M. F. Goodchild, D. J. Maguire, & D. W. Rhind (Eds.), Geographical information systems. Volume 2: management issues and applications (pp. 939-951). New York: Wiley.
19. Le Boulengé-Nguyen, P. Y., & Boulengé , E. (1986). A new ear-tag for small mammals. Journal of Zoology, 209, 302-304.
20. McClean, C. J., & Evans, I. S. (2000). Apparent fractal dimensions from continental scale digital elevation models using variogram methods. Transactions in GIS, 4, 361-378.
21. Meyer, A. N., Shankster, A., Langton, S. D., & Jukes, G. (1995). National commensal rodent survey 1993. Environmental Health Journal, 103, 127-135.
22. Ostro, L. E. T., Young, T. P., Silver, S. C., & Koontz, F. W. (1999). A Geographic Information System method for estimating home range size. Journal of Wildlife Management, 63, 748-755.
23. Pollock, K. H., Nichols, J. D., Brownie, C., & Hines, J. E. (1990). Statistical inference for capture-recapture experiments. Wildlife Monographs, 107, 1-97.
24. Southwood, T. R. E. (1966). Ecological methods with particular reference to the study of insect populations. London: Methuen.
25. Triggs, G. S. (1991). The population ecology of house mice (Mus domesticus) on the Isle of May, Scotland. Journal of Zoology, London, 225, 449-468.
26. Turchin, P. (1998). Quantitative analysis of movement: measuring and modelling population redistribution in animals and plants. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates.
27. White, P. C. L., Saunders, G., & Harris, S. (1996). Spatio-temporal patterns of home range use by foxes (Vulpes vulpes) in urban environments. Journal of Animal Ecology, 65, 121-125.
28. Wilson, A. G. (2000). Complex spatial systems: the modelling foundations of urban and regional analysis. Harlow, Essex: Prentice Hall.
29. Wol., J. O. (1999). Behavioral model systems. In G. W. Barrett, & J. D. Peles (Eds.), Landscape ecology of small mammals (pp. 11-40). New York: Springer.
30. Wood, J. (1996). Scale-based characterisation of digital elevation models. In D. Parker (Ed.), Innovations in GIS 3: selected papers from the third national conference GIS research UK (GISRUK) (pp. 163-175). London: Taylor & Francis.
31. Wood, J. (2001). LandSerf: visualisation & analysis of terrain models. Available at: http://www.soi.city. ac.uk/o/landserf/ [Accessed 27 March 2001].
32. Wood, J. D., Fisher, P. F., Dykes, J. A., Unwin, D. J., & Stynes, K. (1999). The use of the landscape metaphor in understanding population data. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 26, 281-295.
33. Worton, B. J. (1989). Kernel methods for estimating the utilization distribution in home-range studies. Ecology, 70, 164-168.
34. Wray, S., Cresswell, W. J., & Rogers, D. (1992). Dirichlet tesselations: a new, non-parametric approach to home range analysis. In I. G. Priede, & S. M. Swift (Eds.), Wildlife telemetry. Remote monitoring and tracking of animals (pp. 247-255). Chichester: Ellis Horwood.
35. Wray, S., Cresswell, W. J., White, P. C. L., & Harris, S. (1992). What, if anything, is a core area? An analysis of the problems of describing internal range con.gurations. In I. G. Priede, & S. M. Swift (Eds.), Wildlife telemetry. Remote monitoring and tracking of animals (pp. 256-271). Chichester, West Sussex: Ellis Horwood.