Developmental origin of the frontoparietal bone in Bombina variegata (Anura: Discoglossidae)

Journal of Morphology

Volumn 255, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 122-129

  Čihák, Radomír ^a   Královec, Karel ^a   Roček, Zbyněk ^a,b  

^a CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^b INSTITUTE OF GEOLOGY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Anura; Bombina variegata; Development; Discoglossidae; Frontoparietal complex

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BONE DEVELOPMENT; BONE MINERALIZATION; FROGS AND TOADS; FRONTAL BONE; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; SKULL;

ANIMALS; ANURA; CALCIFICATION, PHYSIOLOGIC; FRONTAL BONE; OSTEOGENESIS; PARIETAL BONE;

ACTINOPTERYGII; AMPHIBIA; ANURA; BOMBINA; BOMBINA VARIEGATA; DISCOGLOSSIDAE;

EID: 0347298558     PISSN: 03622525     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmor.10055     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Allis E. 1889. The anatomy and development of the lateral line system in Amia calva. J Morphol 2:463-540.
2. Allis EP. 1898. On the morphology of certain bones of the cheek and snout of Amia calva. J Morphol 14:425-466.
3. Boy JA. 1992. Evolution bei den Amphibien. Veröff Ubersee-Mus Nat Wiss 11:27-40.
4. Dingerkus G, Uhler LD. 1977. Enzyme clearing and Alcian blue stained whole small vertebrates for demonstration of cartilage. Stain Technol 52:229-232.
5. Eaton TH. 1939. Development of the frontoparietal bones in frogs. Copeia 1939:95-97.
6. Eaton TH. 1942. Are "fronto-parietal" bones in frogs actually frontals? J Wash Acad Sci 32:151-153.
7. Erdmann K. 1933. Zur Entwicklung des knöchernen Skeletts von Triton und Rana unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Zeitfolge der Ossifikation. Z Anat Entwicklungsgesch 101:566-651.
8. Evans SE, Milner AR, Musset F. 1990. A discoglossid frog from the Middle Jurassic of England. Palaeontology 33:299-311.
9. Gaupp E. 1896. Anatomie des Frosches. Lehre from Skelet und Muskelsystem. Braunschweig: Fridrich Vieweg und Sohn.
10. Gosner KL. 1960. A simplified table for staging anuran embryos and larvae with notes on identification. Herpetologica 16:183-190.
11. Griffiths I. 1954. On the nature of the fronto-parietal in Amphibia, Salientia. Proc Zool Soc Lond 123:781-792.
12. Hall BK, Hanken J. 1985. The relationship of dermal bones to lateral line canals. Foreword to: de Beer GR. Development of the Vertebrate Skull. Chicago: Chicago Univ. Press. p xvi-xviii.
13. Hanken J, Hall BK. 1984. Variation and timing of the cranial ossification sequence of the Oriental fire-bellied toad, Bombina orientalis (Amphibia, Discoglossidae). J Morphol 182:245-255.
14. Hanken J, Hall BK. 1988. Skull development during anuran metamorphosis. I. Early development of the first three bones to form-the exoccipital, the parasphenoid, and the frontoparietal. J Morphol 195:247-256.
15. Jarvik E. 1948. On the morphology and taxonomy of the Middle Devonian osteolepid fishes of Scotland. K Svenska Vetens Akad Handl 25:1-301.
16. Jarvik E. 1980. Basic Structure and Evolution of Vertebrates 1. London: Academic Press.
17. Jiang X, Iseki S, Maxson RE, Sucov HM, Morriss-Kay, GM. 2002. Tissue origins and interactions in the mammalian skull vault. Dev Biol 241:106-116.
18. Klembara J. 1992. The first record of pit-lines and foraminal pits in tetrapods and the problem of the skull roof bones homology between tetrapods and fishes. Geol Carpath 42:249-252.
19. Klembara J. 1996. The lateral line system of Discosauriscus austriacus (Makowsky 1876) and the homologization of skull roof bones between tetrapods and fishes. Palaeontogr Abt. A 240:1-27.
20. Klembara J. 1997. The cranial anatomy of Discosauriscus Kuhn, a seymouriamorph tetrapod from the Lower Permian of the Boskovice Furrow (Czech Republic). Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 352:257-302.
21. Lebedkina NS. 1968. The development of bones in the skull roof of Amphibia. In: Ørvig T, editor. Current Problems of Lower Vertebrate Phylogeny. Stockholm: Almquist & Wiksell. p 317-329.
22. Lebedkina NS. 1979. [Evolution of the Skull in the Amphibia] (In Russian). Moscow: Nauka Publ House.
23. Le Douarin NM, Kalcheim C. 1999. The Neural Crest. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ Press.
24. Moy-Thomas JA, Miles RS. 1971. Palaeozoic Fishes. London: Chapman & Hall.
25. Nieuwkoop PD, Faber J. 1967. Normal Table of Xenopus laevis. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
26. Parker WK. 1871. On the structure and development of the skull of the Common Frog (Rana temporaria L.). Philos Trans Roy Soc Lond 161:137-211.
27. Pehrson T. 1922. Some points in the cranial development of teleostomean fishes. Acta Zool 3:1-63.
28. Pehrson T. 1944. The development of latero-sensory canal bones in the skull of Esox lucius. Acta Zool 25:135-157.
29. Rage J-C, Roček Z. 1989. Redescription of Triadobatrachus massinoti (Piveteau, 1936), an anuran amphibian from the Early Triassic. Palaeontogr Pal A 206:1-16.
30. Ramaswami LS. 1956. "Frontoparietal" bone in Anura (Amphibia). Curr Sci 25:19-21.
31. Reinbach W. 1939. Uber das Os supratemporale von Pelobates fuscus. Morphol Jahrb 84:169-186.
32. Roček Z. 1981. Cranial anatomy of frogs of the family Pelobatidae Stannius, 1856, with outlines of their phylogeny and systematics. Acta Univ Carol, Biol 1980 (3):1-164.
33. Roček Z. 1988. Origin and evolution of the frontoparietal complex in anurans. Amphibia-Reptilia 9: 385-403.
34. Roček Z, Rage J-C. 2000. Proanuran stages (Triadobatrachus, Czatkobatrachus). In: Heatwole H, Carroll R, editors. Amphibian Biology, Vol. 4. Palaeontology. Chipping Norton: Surrey Beatty & Sons. p 1283-1294.
35. Säve-Söderbergh G. 1933. The dermal bones of the head and the lateral line system in Osteolepis macrolepidotus Ag. With remarks on the terminology of the lateral line system and on the dermal bobnes of certain other crossopterygians. Nova Acta R Soc Scient Upsal 9:1-129.
36. Schoch RR. 1998. Homology of cranial ossifications in urodeles: Significance of developmental data for fossil basal tetrapods. N Jb Geol Paläont Mh 1998:1-25.
37. Sedra SN. 1949. On the homology of certain elements in the skull of Bufo regularis Reuss (Salientia). Proc Zool Soc Lond 119:633-641.
38. Sedra SH, Michael MI. 1957. The development of the skull, visceral arches, larynx and visceral muscles of the South African clawed toad, Xenopus laevis (Daudin) during the process of metamorphosis (from stage 55 to stage 66). Verhandel Kon Nederland Akad Wetensch Afd Natuurk 51:1-80.
39. Sewertzov AN. 1891. Ueber emige Eigenthümlichkeiten in der Entwickelung und im Bau des Schädels von Pelobates fuscus. Bull Soc Imp Nat Moscou (1891), Ser 5:143-160.
40. Smirnov SV. 1994. Postmaturation skull development in Xenopus laevis (Anura, Pipidae): Late-appeanng bones and their bearing on the pipid ancestral morphology. Russ J Herpet 1:21-29.
41. Smirnov SV. 1995. Extra bones in the Pelobates skull as evidence of the paedomorphic origin in the anurans. Zhurn Obshch Biol 56:317-328.
42. Trueb L. 1973. Bones, frogs and evolution. In: Vial JL, editor. Evolutionary Biology of the Anurans. Columbia: Univ Missouri Press. p 65-132.
43. Trueb L, Hanken J. 1992. Skeletal development in Xenopus laevis (Anura, Pipidae). J Morphol 214:1-41.
44. Trueb L, Púgener LA, Maglia AM. 2000. Ontogeny of the bizarre: An osteological description of Pipa pipa (Anura: Pipidae), with an account of skeletal development of the species. J Morphol 243:75-104.
45. Wassersug RJ. 1976. A procedure for differential staining of cartilage and bone in whole formalin-fixed vertebrates. Stain Technol 51:131-134.
46. Wild ER. 1997. Developmental osteology of the hyperossified horned frog, Ceratophrys cornuta (Anura: Leptodactylidae). J Morphol 232:162-206.