Off-pump coronary bypass grafting is associated with less myocardial injury than coronary bypass surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass

Heart Surgery Forum

Volumn 6, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 509-513

  Kathiresan, Sekar ^a   MacGillivray, Thomas E ^a   Lewandrowski, Kent ^a   Servoss, Stephen J ^a   Lewandrowski, Elizabeth ^a   Januzzi Jr , James L ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TROPONIN T;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLOOD SAMPLING; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS SURGERY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; FEMALE; HEART MUSCLE INJURY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OFF PUMP CORONARY SURGERY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; BLOOD; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; HEART INFARCTION; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NECROSIS; NONPARAMETRIC TEST;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; CORONARY DISEASE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; NECROSIS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TROPONIN T;

EID: 0347286903     PISSN: 10983511     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Ascione R, Lloyd CT, Gomes WJ, Caputo M, Bryan AJ, Angelini GD. 1999. Beating versus arrested heart revascularization: evaluation of myocardial function in a prospective randomized study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 15:685-90.
2. Ascione R, Lloyd CT, Underwood MJ, Gomes WJ, Angelini GD. 1999. On-pump versus off-pump coronary revascularization: evaluation of renal function. Ann Thorac Surg 68:493-8.
3. Boncheck LI, Ullyot DJ. 1998. Minimally invasive coronary bypass: a dissenting opinion. Circulation 98:495-7.
4. Bredee JJ, Jansen EWL. 1998. Coronary artery bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass. Curr Opin Cardiol 13:476-82.
5. Diegeler A, Hirsch R, Schneider F, et al. 2000. Neuromonitoring and neurocognitive outcome in off-pump versus conventional coronary bypass operation. Ann Thorac Surg 69:1162-6.
6. Favaloro R. 1998. Critical analysis of coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a 30-year journey. J Am Coll Cardiol 31:1B-63B.
7. Januzzi JL, Lewandrowski K, MacGillivray TE, et al. 2002. A comparison of cardiac troponin T and creatine kinase-MB for patient evaluation after cardiac surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 39:1518-23.
8. Jegaden O, Mikacloff P. 2001. Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: the beginning of the end? Eur J Cardiothoracic Surg 19:237-8.
9. Kilger E, Pichler B, Weis F, et al. 2000. Markers of myocardial ischemia after minimally invasive and conventional coronary operation. Ann Thorac Surg 70:2023-8.
10. Klatte K, Chaitman BR, Theroux P, et al. 2001. Increased mortality after coronary artery bypass graft surgery is associated with increased levels of postoperative creatine kinase-myocardial band isoenzyme release. J Am Coll Cardiol 38:1070-7.
11. Krejca M, Skiba J, Szmagala P, Gburek T, Bochenek A. 1999. Cardiac troponin T release during coronary surgery using intermittent cross-clamp with fibrillation, on-pump, and off-pump beating heart. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 16:337-41.
12. Svennevig J. 2000. Off-pump vs on-pump surgery: a review. Scand Cardiovasc J 34:7-11.
13. van Dijk D, Nierich AP, Jansen EW, et al. 2001. Early outcome after off-pump versus on-pump coronary bypass surgery. Circulation 104:1761-6.
14. Wan S, Izzat MB, Lee TW, Wan IYP, Tang NLS, Yim APC. 1999. Avoiding cardiopulmonary bypass in multivessel CABG reduces cytokine response and myocardial injury. Ann Thorac Surg 68:52-7.
15. Yacoub M. 2001. Off-pump coronary bypass surgery: in search of an identity. Circulation 104:1743-5.
16. Yokoyama T, Baumgartner FJ, Gheissari A, Capouya ER, Panagiotides GP, Declusin RJ. 2000. Off-pump versus on-pump coronary bypass in high-risk subgroups. Ann Thorac Surg 70:1546-50.