Agency authority to define the scope of private rights of action

Administrative Law Review

Volumn 48, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 1-

  Pierce Jr , Richard J ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0347247725     PISSN: 00018368     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (4)

1. See generally I, II KENNETH C. DAVIS & RICHARD J. PIERCE JR., ADMINISTRATIVE LAW TREATISE §§ 7, 8, 11 (3d ed. 1994).
2. See, e.g., Hallstrom v. Tillamook Cty., 493 U.S. 20, 23 n.1 (1989) (listing 14 environmental statutes that included a private right of action provision). See also J.I. Case v. Borak, 377 U.S. 426 (1964) (implying a private right of action for violation of a provision of the Securities & Exchange Act).
3. For instance, the Food & Drug Administration must bring a judicial action to condemn a food or drug that it believes to be adulterated or mislabeled. See, e.g., United States v. Seven Cartons, 424 F.2d 1364 (7th Cir. 1970); United States v. Article of Drug, 415 F.2d 390 (5th Cir. 1969).
4. For discussion of the substantial evidence test and the arbitrary and capricious test, see II DAVIS & PIERCE, supra note 1, §§ 11.2, 11.4.