Treatment Efficacy and Clinical Utility: A Guidelines Model Applied to Psychotherapy Research

Chirurg

Volumn 73, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 176-179

  Abrahamson, Daniel J ^a  

^a Traumatic Stress Institute   (United States)

Author keywords

Clinical utility; Treatment effectiveness; Treatment efficacy; Treatment guidelines

Indexed keywords

EID: 0347238003     PISSN: 00094722     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (16)

1. Abrahamson, D. J. (1998). Political issues in practice guidelines implementation. Behavioral Healthcare Tomorrow, 7, 32-36.
2. Abrahamson, D. J. (1999). Outcomes, guidelines, and manuals: On leading horses to water. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 6, 467-471.
3. American Psychological Association, Task Force on Psychological Intervention Guidelines (APA) (1995). Template for developing guidelines: Interventions for mental disorders and psychosocial aspects of physical disorders. Washington, DC: Author.
4. American Psychological Association, Template Implementation Work Group (APA) (2000). Criteria for evaluating treatment guidelines. Washington, DC: Author.
5. Barlow, D. H., Hayes, S. C., & Nelson, R. O. (1984). The scientist practitioner: Research and accountability in clinical and educational settings. New York: Pergamon.
6. Beutler, L. E. (2000). David and Goliath: When empirical and clinical standards of practice meet. American Psychologist, 55, 997-1007.
7. de Avila, J. (1995). Professional standards by fiat: The undermining of treatment for trauma and dissociative defenses. Treating Abuse Today, 5, 21-28.
8. Garfield, S. L. (1966). Clinical psychology and the search for identity. American Psychologist, 21, 353-362.
9. Goldfried, M. R., & Padawer, W. (1982). Current status and future directions in psychotherapy. In M. R. Goldfried (Ed.), Converging themes in psychotherapy: Trends in psychodynamic, humanistic, and behavioral practice (pp. 3-19). New York: Springer.
10. Goldfried, M. R., & Wolfe, B. E. (1996). Psychotherapy practice and research: Repairing a strained alliance. American Psychologist, 51, 1007-1016.
11. Nathan, P. E., Stuart, S. P., & Dolan, S. L. (2000). Research on psychotherapy efficacy and effectiveness: Between Scylla and Charybdis? Psychological Bulletin, 126, 964-981.
12. Parloff, M. B. (1998). Is psychotherapy more than manual labor? Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 5, 376-381.
13. Schneider, K.J. (1998). Toward a science of the heart: Romantacism and the revival of psychology. American Psychologist, 53, 277-289.
14. Seligman, M. E. P. (1995). The effectiveness of psychotherapy. American Psychologist, 50, 965-974.
15. Stricker, G., Abrahamson, D. J., Bologna, N. C., Hollon, S. D., Robinson, E. A., & Reed, G. M. (1999). Treatment guidelines: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Psychotherapy, 36, 69-79.
16. Task Force on Promotion and Dissemination of Psychological Procedures. (1995). Training in and dissemination of empirically-validated psychological treatments: Report and recommendations. The Clinical Psychologist, 48(1), 3-23.