Response categories in Likert-scale;Categorías de respuesta en escalas tipo likert

Psicothema

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 623-631

  Osinski, Isabel Cañadas ^a   Bruno, Alfonso Sánchez ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE LA LAGUNA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0347219654     PISSN: 02149915     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Cañadas, I., Prieto, P., San Luis, C. y Domínguez, F. (1992). Estudio de cuantificadores lingüísticos de frecuencia y de cantidad al uso en escalas psicológicas españolas. III Simposium de Metodología de las CC. Sociales y del Comportamiento. Santiago de Compostela.
2. Cañadas Osinski, I. (1997). Estudio de cuantificadores lingüísticos y su aplicación en escalas psicológicas. Tesis doctoral. Universidad de La Laguna.
3. Dawes, R.M. (1975). Fundamentos y técnicas de medición de actitudes. México: Limusa.
4. Fucci, D., Petrosino, L. y Harris, D. (1985). A magnitude estimation response pool for production of lingual vibrotactile magnitudes. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 60, 763-766.
5. Garner, W.R. y Creelman, C.D. (1976). Problemas y métodos de la elaboración de escalas psicológicas. En G.F. Summers (Ed.) Medición de las actitudes. México: Trillas. 59-102.
6. González Lorenzo, M., Lameiras Fernández, M. y Varela Lovelle, M. (1990a). Escalamiento de magnitud en la satisfacción laboral I. Validez de la ley de potencia. Revista de Psicología General y Aplicada, 43(3), 411-417.
7. Guildford, J.P. (1954). Psychometric Method. New York: McGraw-Hill.
8. Hartley, J., Trueman, M. y Rodgers, A. (1984). The effects of verbal and numerical quantifiers on questionnaire responses. Applied Ergonomics, 15(2), 149-155.
9. Kemp, S. (1988). Magnitude estimation of the utility of nonmonetary items. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 26(6), 544-547.
10. Lee Rasmussen, J. (1989). Analysis of Likertscale data: A reinterpretation of Gregorire and Driver. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 167-170.
11. Meek, P., Sennott-Miller, L. y Ferketich, S. (1992). Scaling stimuli with magnitude estimation. Research in Nursing & Health, 15, 77-81.
12. Pohl, N.F. (1981). Scale considerations in using vague quantifiers. Journal of Experimental Education, 49, 235-240.
13. Schriesheim, C. y Castro, S. (1996). Referent effects in the magnitude estimation scaling of frecuency expressions for response anchor sets: an empirical investigation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56, 557-569.
14. Schriesheim, C., Cogliser, C.C., Newmark, R.I. y Lowensohn, S.H. (1994). The equal-interval nature investigation using fiedler's least preferred coworked (LPC) scale and magnitude estimation and case III scaling procedures. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 253-262.
15. Schriesheim, C. y Gardiner, G. (1992). A comparative test of magnitude estimation and pair-comparison treatment of complete ranks for scaling a small number of equal-interval frecuency response anchors. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 867-877.
16. Schriesheim, C. y Novelli, J.R. (1989). A comparative test of the interval-scale properties of magnitude estimation and case III scaling and recommendations for equal-interval frecuency response anchors. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 49, 59-73.
17. Schriesheim, C. y Schriesheim, J. (1974). Development and empirical verification of new response categories to increase the validity of multiple response alternative questionnaires. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34, 877-884.
18. Schriesheim, C. y Schriesheim, J. (1978). The invariance of anchor points obtained by magnitude estimation and pair-comparison treatment of complete ranks scaling procedures: an empirical comparison and implications for validity of measurement. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 38, 977-983.
19. Stevens, S.S. (1975). Psychophysics. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
20. Wills, C.E. y Moore, C.F (1994). A controversy in scaling of subjetive States: Magnitude estimation versus category rating methods. Research in Nursing & Health, 17, 231-237.