Anchored narratives' and the interface of law, psychology and semiotics

Legal and Criminological Psychology

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 17-45

  Jackson, Bernard S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0347199600     PISSN: 13553259     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8333.1996.tb00305.x     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Bankowski, Z. (1981). The value of truth: Fact scepticism revisited. Legal Studies, 1, 257-266.
2. Bankowski, Z. (1988). The jury and reality. In M. Findlay & P. Duff (Eds), The Jury under Attack, pp. 8-26. London: Butterworths.
3. Bennett, W. L. & Feldman, M. S. (1981). Reconstructing Reality in the Courtroom. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
4. Bruner, J. (1986). Adual Minds, Possible Worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5. Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of Meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6. Burke, K. (1954). Permanence and Change. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
7. Burke, K. (1969). A Grammar of Motives. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
8. Canter, D. & Heritage, R. (1990). A multivariate model of sexual offence behaviour: Developments in 'offender pro filing'. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry, 1/2, 185-212
9. Canter, D. (1994). Criminal Shadows. Inside the Mind of the Serial Killer. London: Harper Collins. Combes, A. (1993). Blind Injustice. The Guardian Weekend, 27.03.93, 30-32.
10. Ewick, P. & Silbey, S. S. (1995). Subversive stories and hegemonic tales: Toward a sociology of narrative. Law and Society Review, 29(2), 197-226.
11. Farrington, D. P., Hawkins, K. & Lloyd-Bostock, S. (1979). Introduction: Doing psycholegal research. In D. P. Farrington, K. Hawkins & S. Lloyd-Bostock (Eds), Psychology, Lan' and Legal Processes, pp. xiii-xvii. London: Macmillan.
12. Fletcher, G. P. (1978). Rethinking Criminal Law. Boston & Toronto: Little, Brown & Co.
13. Gergen, K. J. & Gergen, M. M. (1986). Narrative form and the construction of psychological science. In T. R. Sarbin (Ed.), Narrative Psychology, The Storied Nature of Human Conduct, pp. 22-44. New York: Praeger.
14. Goodrich, P. (1986). Reading the Lan: Oxford: Blackwell.
15. Greimas, A. J. & Courtes, J. (1982). Semiotics and Language. An Analytical Dictionary. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
16. Hastie, R., Penrod, S. & Pennington, N. (1983). Inside the Jury. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
17. Hickey, L. (1993). Presupposition under cross-examination. International Journal for the Semiotics of Lau; VI(16), 89-109.
18. Jackson, B. S. (1979). Towards an integrated approach to criminal law: Fletcher's rethinking criminal law. Criminal Law Review, 621-629.
19. Jackson, B. S. (1985). Semiotics and Legal Theory. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
20. Jackson, B. S. (1988a). Law, Fact and Narrative Coherence. Merseyside: Deborah Charles Publications.
21. Jackson, B. S. (1988£). Narrative models in legal proof. International Journal for the Semiotics of Lan; 1(3), 225-246.
22. Jackson, B. S. (1990). Narrative theories and legal discourse. In C. Nash (Ed.), Narrative in Culture, pp. 23-50. London: Routledge.
23. Jackson, B. S. (1991). Semiotic scepticism: A response to Neil MacCormick. International Journal for the Semiotics of Lan; IV(11), 175-190.
24. Jackson, B. S. (1994a). Thématisation et typifications narratives en droit. Protêt, 22(2), 57-68. English version: Thématisation and the narrative typifications of the law. In D. Nelken (Ed.), Law as Communication (forthcoming, 1996). London: Dartmouth.
25. Jackson, B. S. (1994&). Envisaging law. International Journal far the Semiotics of Law, VII(21), 311-334.
26. Jackson, B. S. (1995). Making Sense in Law. Liverpool: Deborah Charles Publications.
27. Landowski, E. (1989). Truth and verediction in law. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, II(1V), 29-47.
28. Lazarus, R. S. (1984). On the primacy of cognition. American Psychologist, 39(2), 124-129.
29. Loftus, E. F. & Zanni, G. (1975). Eyewitness testimony: The influence of the wording of a question. Bulletin of the Pychonomic Society, 5, 86-88.
30. MacCormick, N. (1978). Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
31. MacCormick, N. (1991). Notes on narrativity and the normative syllogism. International Journal for the Semiotics of Lan; IV(ll), 163-174.
32. McCabe, S. (1988). Is jury research dead?. In M. Findlay & P. Duff (Eds), The Jury under Attack, pp. 27-39. London: Butterworths.
33. Sarbin, T. R. (Ed.) (1986). Narrative Psychology, The Storied Nature of Human Conduct. New York: Praeger.
34. Sealy, L. (1979). The contribution of psychology to legal processes: An analysis of jury studies. In D. P. Farrington, K. Hawkins & S. LJoyd-Bostock (Eds), Psychology, Lav and Legal Processes, pp. 54-68. London: Macmillan.
35. Sealy, A. P, & Cornish, W. R. (1973). Juries and the rules of evidence. Criminal Law Review, 208-223.
36. Sherwin, R. K. (1994). Law frames: Historical truth and narrative necessity in a criminal case. Stanford Law Review, 47, 39-83.
37. Twining, W. L. (1985). Theories of Evidence: Bentham and Wigmore. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
38. Twining, W. L. (1990). Rethinking Evidence. Exploratory Essays. Oxford: Blackwell.
39. Twining, W. L. (1995). Anchored narratives-a comment. European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, 1, 106-114.
40. Wagenaar, W. A. (1995). Anchored narratives: A theory of judicial reasoning and its consequences. In G. Davies, S. Lloyd-Bostock, M. McMurran & C. Wilson (Eds), -Psychology Law and Criminal Justice: International Developments in Research and Practice, pp. 267-285. Berlin: de Gruyter.
41. Wagenaar, W. A., van Koppen, P. J. & Crombag, H. F. M. (1993). Anchored Narratives. The Psychology of Criminal Evidence. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
42. Weinreich-Haste, H. (1984). Morality, social meaning, and rhetoric. The social context of moral reasoning. In W. M. Kurtines & J. L. Gewirtz (Eds), Morality, Moral Behavior, and Moral Development, pp. 325-347. New York: Wiley.