SET for the Future: Working towards inclusive science, engineering and technology curricula in higher education

Studies in Higher Education

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 165-182

  Cronin, Catherine ^a,b   Foster, Maureen ^a   Lister, Elizabeth ^a  

^a HERIOT WATT UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0347173968     PISSN: 03075079     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03075079912331379868     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. BENSTON, M.L. (1992) Women's voices/men's voices: technology as language, in: G. KIRKUP & L. SMITH KELLER (Eds) Inventing Women: science, technology and gender, pp. 33-41 (Cambridge, Polity Press).
2. BYRNE, E.M. (1993) Women and Science: the Snark syndrome (London, Falmer Press).
3. COCKBURN, C. (1988) Machinery of Dominance: women, men, and technical know-how (Boston, MA, Northeastern University Press).
4. CRONIN, C. (1995) Is the 'feminine engineer' an oxymoron? women's views and experiences of gender and engineering, University College Galway Women's Studies Centre Review, 3, pp. 43-52.
5. CRONIN, C. & ROGER, A. (1999) Theorising progress: women in science, engineering and technology in higher education, Journal for Research in Science Teaching (in press).
6. CRONIN, C., COOPER, M. & ROGER, A. (1997) Participation Guide: women in science, engineering and technology in higher education (Edinburgh, Scottish Higher Education Funding Council).
7. DUFFIELD, J., COOPER, M. & ROGER, A. (1997) Access Guide: women into science, engineering and technology in higher education (Edinburgh, Scottish Higher Education Funding Council).
8. FINK, A. & KOSECOFF, J.B. (1985) How to Conduct Surveys (London, Sage).
9. HALL, R.M. & SANDLER, B.R. (1982) The Classroom Climate: a chilly one for women? (Washington, DC, Association of American Colleges).
10. HALL, R.M. & SANDLER, B.R. (1984) Out of the Classroom: a chilly campus climate for women? (Washington, DC, Association of American Colleges).
11. HENES, R. (1996) Creating Gender Equity in Your Teaching (Davis, CA, College of Engineering, University of California [http://www.engr.ucdavis.edu/college/information/gender/]).
12. HENWOOD, F. (1996) WISE choices? Understanding occupational decision-making in a climate of equal opportunities for women in science and technology, Gender and Education, 8, pp. 199-214.
13. HIGGINS, C., WATT, S., EVANS, R., COOPER, M. & ROGER, A. (1997) Progression Guide: women in science, engineering and technology in higher education (Edinburgh, Scottish Higher Education Funding Council).
14. HMSO (1994) The Rising Tide: a report on women, science, engineering and technology (London, HMSO).
15. INVOLVE PROJECT (1997) Guidelines for Good Practice in Inclusive Teaching (unpublished) (St. Andrews, Computer Science Division, School of Mathematical and Computational Sciences, University of St Andrews).
16. KRAMARAE, C. (1980) The Voices and Words of Women and Men (London, Pergamon Press).
17. KRAMARAE, C. (1988) Gotta go Myrtle, technology's at the door, in: C. KRAMARAE (Ed.) Technology and Women's Voices: keeping in touch (New York, Routledge & Kegan Paul).
18. LEVESON, N. (1990) Educational pipeline issues for women, http://www.ai.mit.edu/people/ellens/Gender/ pipeline.html.
19. LIPS, H.M. (1992) Bifurcation of a common path: gender splitting on the road to engineering and physical science careers, Initiatives, 55, pp. 13-22.
20. MATYAS, M.L. & DIX, L.S. (Eds) (1992) Science and Engineering Programs: on target for women? (Washington, DC, National Academy Press).
21. MCILWEE, J.S. & ROBINSON, J.G. (1992) Women in Engineering: gender, power, and workplace culture (Albany, NY, State University of New York Press).
22. MOXHAM, S. & ROBERTS, P. (1995) Gender in the Engineering Curriculum (Melbourne, University of Melbourne, Swinburne University of Technology & University of Ballarat, Equal Opportunity Unit).
23. NEW ENGLAND CONSORTIUM FOR UNDERGRADUATE SCIENCE EDUCATION (1996) Achieving Gender Equity in Science Classrooms (Providence, RI, Office of the Dean of the College, Brown University).
24. OTTLEY, P. (1997) Gender Inclusive Engineering and Technology: guidelines for good practice in higher education (unpublished) (Preston, Centre for Women in Technology, Design and Manufacture, Faculty of Design and Technology, University of Central Lancashire).
25. PRISM (1994) Women in Science: attitudes of university students towards a career in research: a pilot study (London, PRISM).
26. ROSSER, S.V. (1990) Female-friendly Science (New York, Pergamon Press).
27. SCOTTISH WIDER ACCESS PROGRAMME (1993) Widening Access: women into engineering (Edinburgh, Scottish Wider Access Programme).
28. SEYMOUR, E. & HEWITT, N.M. (1997) Talking about Leaving: why undergraduates leave the sciences (Oxford, Westview Press).
29. SPERTUS, E. (1991) Why are there so few female computer scientists?, MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Technical Report, no. 1315.
30. STRENTA, A.C., ELLIOT, R., ADAIR, R., MATIER, M. & SCOTT, J. (1994) Choosing and leaving science in highly selective institutions, Research in Higher Education, 35, pp. 513-547.
31. TANNEN, D. (1994) Gender and Discourse (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
32. THOMAS, K. (1990) Gender and Subject in Higher Education (Buckingham, Open University Press).
33. TOBIAS, S. (1990) They're Not Dumb, They're Different: stalking the second tier (Tucson, AZ, Research Corporation).
34. WILSON, F. (1992) Language, technology, gender, and power, Human Relations, 45, pp. 883-904.