Bioterrorism and biodefence research: Changing the focus of microbiology

Nature Reviews Microbiology

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 70-74

  Atlas, Ronald M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SMALLPOX VACCINE;

ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL WARFARE; BIOTECHNOLOGY; CLASSIFICATION; ECONOMICS; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HUMAN; LEGAL ASPECT; MEDICAL RESEARCH; METHODOLOGY; MICROBIOLOGY; REVIEW; SMALLPOX; STANDARD; UNITED STATES;

ANIMALS; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; BIOTECHNOLOGY; BIOTERRORISM; HUMANS; MICROBIOLOGY; RESEARCH DESIGN; RESEARCH SUPPORT; SMALLPOX; SMALLPOX VACCINE; SOCIETIES, SCIENTIFIC; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0347156896     PISSN: 17401526     EISSN: 17401534     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nrmicro728     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. National Academy of Sciences. Making the Nation Safer: The Role of Science and Technology in Countering Terrorism, [online], (cited 1 Aug. 2003), (2002).
2. Fauci, A. S. Biodefence on the research agenda. Nature 421, 787 (2003).
3. Fauci, A.S. An expanded biodefense role for the National Institutes of Health, [online], (cited 1 Aug. 2003), (2002).
4. NIAID Biodefense Research Agenda for Category A Agents, [online], (cited 1 Aug. 2003), (2002).
5. NIAID Biodefense Research Agenda for Category B and C Priority Pathogens, [online], (cited 1 Aug. 2003), (2003).
6. Summary of NIAID Accomplishments in Biodefense Research, [online], (cited 1 Aug. 2003), (2003).
7. Atlas, R. M. ASM Testimony on Creating the Department of Homeland Security, [online], (cited 1 Aug. 2003), (2002).
8. O'Toole, T. Center for Civilian Biodefense Strategies Testimony on Creating The Department Of Homeland Security: Consideration of the Administration's Proposal, [online], (cited 1 Aug. 2003), (2002).
9. Agres, T. Bioshield outlined, in The Scientist [online], (cited 1 Aug. 2003), (2003).
10. Agres, T. Bioshield moving forward, in The Scientist [online], (cited 1 Aug. 2003), (2003).
11. Atlas, R. M. National security and the biological research community. Science 298, 753-754 (2002).
12. Jacobs, L.G. & Rindskopf Parker, E. Government controls of information and scientific inquiry. Biosecurity and Bioterrorism: Biodefense Strategy, Practice and Science 1, 1-13 (2003).
13. Boyce, N. Speak no evil: should biologists publish work that could be misused? US News (Washington DC, USA) 60-62 (24 June 2002).
14. Couzin, J. A call for restraint on biological data. Science 279, 749-751 (2002).
15. Monastersky, R. Publish and perish? Chronicle of Higher Education 49, A16-A19 (2002).
16. Cozzarelli, N. PNAS policy on publication of sensitive material in the life sciences. Proc. Natl Acad. Sc. USA 100, 1463 (2003).
17. Uncensored exchange of scientific results. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 1464 (2003).
18. Kennedy, D. Two cultures. Science 299, 1148 (2003).
19. Statement on scientific safety and security. Science 299, 1149 (2003).
20. Kennedy, D. World's leading journal editors urge self- governance, [online], (cited 1 Aug. 2003), (2003).
21. Statement on the consideration of biodefence and biosecurity. Nature 421, 771 (2003).
22. Park, P. New standards for publication of sensitive research, in The Scientist, [online], (cited 1 Aug. 2003), (2003).