Perspectives from Consumers (Students) in a Distance Education Program

Journal of Technology in Human Services

Volumn 16, Issue 2-3, 1999, Pages 161-174

  Coe, Jo Ann R ^a   Gandy, John ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

Distance education; Student's perceptions of distance teaching

Indexed keywords

EID: 0347140623     PISSN: 15228835     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J017v16n02_12     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Coe, J. & Elliott, D. (1997). An evaluation of teaching direct practice in distance education programs for rural settings. Paper presented at the Annual Program Meeting of the Council on Social Work Education, Chicago, IL. Commission on Accreditation (1994). Handbook of Accreditation Standards and Procedures (4th ed.), Alexandria, VA: Council on Social Work Education.
2. Coe, J. & Elliott, D. (1997). An evaluation of teaching direct practice in distance education programs for rural settings. Paper presented at the Annual Program Meeting of the Council on Social Work Education, Chicago, IL. Commission on Accreditation (1994). Handbook of Accreditation Standards and Procedures (4th ed.), Alexandria, VA: Council on Social Work Education.
3. Dillon, C. (1989). Faculty rewards and instructional telecommunications: A view from the telecourse facility. American Journal of Distance Education, 3 (2): 35-43.
4. Forster, M. & Rehner, T. (1998). Part-time MSW distance education: A program evaluation. Computers in Human Services, 15(2/3): 9.
5. Freddolino, P.P. (1996). Maintaining quality in graduate social work programs delivered to distant sites using electronic instruction technology. In E.T. Reck (Ed.). Modes of Professional Education II: The Electronic Social Work Curriculum in the Twenty-First Century. Tulane Studies in Social Welfare, 20. New Orleans, LA: Tulane University.
6. Freddolino, P.P. (1997a). The importance of relationships for a quality learning environment in interactive TV classrooms. Journal for Education for Business, 71 (4): 205-208.
7. Freddolino, P.P. (1997b). Building on experience: Lessons from a distance education MSW program. Paper presented at the Information Technologies for Social Work Education: Using to Teach-Teaching to Use, Charleston, SC.
8. Gutierrez, L.M., Parsons, R.J. & Cox, E.O. (1998). Empowerment in Social Work Practice: A Sourcebook. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks-Cole.
9. Haga, M. & Heitkamp, T.L. (1995). Evaluation results of an innovative social work distance education program. Paper presented at the Annual program Meeting of the Council on Social Work Education, San Diego, CA.
10. Kalke, N.L., Rooney, R. & Macy, J. (1998). Providing effective education in distance education. Paper presented at the Annual Program Meeting of the Council on Social Work Education, Orlando, FL.
11. Lockhart, L. & Wilson, S. (1997). Distance education: a summary of survey results. Social Work Education Reporter, 45 (2): 5.
12. Mani, G. (1988). Attitudes of external faculty towards distance education. In D. Stewart and Daniel, J. (Editors), Developing Distance Education (pp. 197-300), Oslo: International Council for Distance Education.
13. Patchner, M.A., Wise, S. & Petracchi, H. (1998). Teaching research: an evaluation of ITV and face-to-face instruction. Paper presented at the Annual Program Meeting of the Council on Social Work Education, Orlando, FL.
14. Petracchi, H.E. & Morgenbesser, M. (1995). The use of video and one-way broadcast technology to deliver continuing social work education: A comparative assessment of student learning. Journal of Continuing Social Work Education, 6 (3): 18-22.
15. Raymond, F.B. (1996). Delivering the MSW curriculum to non-traditional students through interactive television. In E.T. Reck (Ed). Modes of Professional Education II: The Electronic Social Work Curriculum in the Twenty-First Century. Tulane Studies in Social Welfare, 20. New Orleans, LA: Tulane University.
16. Raymond, F.B. & Pike, C.K. (1997). Electronic technologies for social work education. Copy of paper submitted for inclusion in the Supplement to the Encyclopedia of Social Work, 19th ed.
17. Saleeby, D. (1992). The Strengths Perspective in Social Work Practice. New York: Longman.
18. Thyer, B.A., Artelt, T., Markward, M.K. & Dozier, C.D. (1998). Evaluating distance learning in social work education: A replication study. Journal of Social Work Education, 34 (2): 291-295.
19. Thyer, B.A., Polk, G. & Gaudin, J.G. (1997). Distance learning in social work education: a preliminary evaluation. Journal of Social Work Education, 33 (2): 363-367.
20. Weinbach, R.W. (1985). Evaluation of the Interactive Closed Circuit Television (ICCT) Method. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina, College of Social Work.
21. Weinbach, R.W., Gandy, J. & Tartaglia, L. (1984). Addressing the needs of the part-time student through interactive television: An evaluation. Arete, 9: 12-29.