Australian Students' Self-Appraisal of Their Work Samples and Academic Progress

Elementary School Journal

Volumn 97, Issue 5, 1996, Pages

  Van Kraayenoord, Christina E ^a   Paris, Scott G ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0347138613     PISSN: 00135984     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Anderson, L. M., Stevens, D. D., Prawat, R. S., & Nickerson, J. (1988). Classroom task environments and students' task-related beliefs. Elementary School Journal, 88, 281-295.
2. Blumenfeld, P. C., Pintrich, P., Meece, J., & Wessels, K. (1982). The formation and role of self- perceptions of ability in elementary classrooms. Elementary School Journal, 82, 401-420.
3. Calfee, R. C. (1991). Authentic assessment of elementary literacy: A question of realities. Kamehameha Journal of Education, 2, 71-76.
4. Covington, M. C. (1992). Making the grade. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Deci, E. L., Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). Motivation and education: The self-determination perspective. Educational Psychologist, 26, 325-346.
6. Dweck, C., & Bempechat, J. (1983). Children's theories of intelligence: Consequences for learning. In S. Paris, G. Olson, & H. Stevenson (Eds.), Learning and motivation in the classroom (pp. 239-256). Hilsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Entwisle, D. R., Alexander, K. L., Pallas, A. M., & Cadigan, D. (1987). The emergent academic self-image of first-graders: Its response to social structure. Child Development, 58, 1190-1206.
8. Garner, R. (1987). Metacognition and reading comprehension. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
9. Hiebert, E. H., & Hutchison, T. A. (1991). Research directions: The current state of alternative assessments for policy and instructional uses. Language Arts, 68, 662-668.
10. Jacobs, J. E., & Paris, S. G. (1987). Children's metacognition about reading: Issues in definition, measurement, and instruction. Educational Psychologist, 22, 255-278.
11. Mills, R. P. (1989). Portfolios capture rich array of student performance. School Administrator, 46, 8-11.
12. Mossenson, L., Hill, P., & Masters, G. (1987). Tests of Reading Comprehension (TORCH). Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.
13. Nicholls, J. G. (1992). Students as educational theorists. In D. Schunk & J. Meece (Eds.), Student perceptions in the classroom (pp. 267-286). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. Nichols, P. D. (1994). A framework for developing cognitively diagnostic assessments. Review of Educational Research, 64, 575-603.
15. Paris, S. G., & Ayres, L. R. (1994). Becoming reflective students and teachers with portfolios and authentic assessment, Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
16. Paris, S. G., Calfee, R. C., Filby, N., Hiebert, E. H., Pearson, P. D., Valencia, S. W., & Wolf, K. P. (1992). A framework for authentic literacy assessment. Reading Teacher, 46(2), 88-98.
17. Paris, S. G., & Cunningham, A. (1996). Children becoming students. In D. Berliner & R. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 17-147). New York: Macmillan.
18. Paris, S. G., & Newman, R. S. (1990). Developmental aspects of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 25, 87-102.
19. Paris, S. G., & Turner, J. C. (1994). Situated motivation. In P. Pintrich, D. Brown, & C. Weinstein (Eds.), Student motivation, cognition, and learning: Essays in honor of Wilbert J. McKeachie (pp. 213-237). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Paris, S. G., Turner, J. C., Muchmore, J., & Perry, N. (1995). Teachers' and students' perceptions of portfolios. Journal of Cognitive Education, 5, 7-40.
21. Paris, S. G., & van Kraayenoord, C. E. (1992). New directions in assessing students' reading. Psychological Test Bulletin, 5, 20-27.
22. Paris, S. G., & van Kraayenoord, C. E. (in press). Assessing young children's literacy strategies and development. In S. Paris & H. Wellman (Eds.), Global prospects for education: Development, culture, and schooling. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
23. Paris, S. G., & Winograd, P. (1990). How metacognition can promote academic learning and instruction. In B. F. Jones & L. Idol (Eds.), Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction (pp. 15-51). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. Rosenholtz, S. J., & Simpson, C. (1984). The formation of ability conceptions: Developmental trend or social construction? Review of Educational Research, 54, 31-63.
25. Schunk, D. H. (1989). Social cognitive theory and self-regulated learning. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement (pp. 83-110). New York: Springer-Verlag.
26. Stipek, D. J., & Mac Iver, D. (1989). Developmental change in children's assessment of intellectual competence. Child Development, 60, 521-538.
27. Swanson, H. L. (1990). Influence of metacognitive knowledge and aptitude on problem-solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 306-314.
28. Tierney, R. L., Carter M. A., & Desai, L. E. (1991). Portfolios in the reading-writing classroom. Norwood, MA: Christopher Gordon.
29. van Kraayenoord, C. E. (1994). Toward self-assessment of literacy learning. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 17, 45-55.
30. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31. Weeks, B., & Leaker, J. (1991). Managing literacy assessment with young learners. Adelaide, South Australia: ERA Publications.
32. Wick, J. W. (1991). School attitude measure. Iowa City, IA: American Testronics.
33. Wiggins, G. (1989). A true test: Toward more authentic and equitable assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 70, 703-713.