Dynamic Interaction Measures for Decentralized Control of Multivariable Processes

Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research

Volumn 43, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 283-287

  Lee, Jietae ^a   Edgar, Thomas F ^b  

^a Kyungpook National University   (South Korea)

^b The University of Texas at Austin   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTROL SYSTEMS; ERROR ANALYSIS; FUNCTIONS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; PRODUCT DESIGN; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

MULTIVARIABLE PROCESSES;

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING;

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING; COMPUTER CONTROL; MATHEMATICAL MODELING;

ARTICLE; DYNAMICS; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MEASUREMENT; PROCESS CONTROL; PROCESS TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 0347128034     PISSN: 08885885     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ie020869l     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Bristol, E. On a New Measure of Interaction for Multivariable Process Control. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 1966, AC-11, 133.
2. Shinskey, F. G. Process Control Systems, 4th ed.; McGraw-Hill: New York, 1996.
3. Grosdidier, P.; Morari, M.; Holt, B. R. Closed-Loop Properties from Steady-State Gain Information. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1985, 24, 22.
4. Skogestad, S.; Morari, M. Implications of Large RGA Elements on Control Performance. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1987, 26, 2029.
5. Witcher, M.; McAvoy, T. J. Interacting Control Systems: Steady State and Dynamic Measurement of Interactions. ISA Trans. 1977, 16, 35.
6. Gagnepain, J. P.; Seborg, D. E. Analysis of Process Interactions with Application to Multiloop Control System Design. Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev. 1982, 21, 5.
7. Tung, L.; Edgar, T. F. Analysis of Control Output Interactions in Dynamic Systems. AIChE J. 1981, 27, 690.
8. Jensen, N.; Fisher, D. G.; Shah, S. L. Interaction Analysis in Multivariable Control System. AIChE J. 1986, 32, 959.
9. Hovd, M.; Skogestad, S. Simple Frequency-dependent Tools for Control System Analysis, Structure Selection and Design. Automatica 1992, 28, 989.
10. Skogestad, S.; Morari, M. Variable Selection for Decentralized Control. AIChE Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, 1988.
11. Campo, P. J.; Morari, M. Achievable Closed-loop Properties of Systems under Decentralized Control: Conditions Involving the Steady-state Gain. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 1994, AC-39, 932.
12. Lee, J.; Edgar, T. F. Conditions for Decentralized Integral Controllability. J. Process Control 2002, 12, 797.
13. Grosdidier, P.; Morari, M. Interaction Measures for Systems under Decentralized Control. Automatica 1986, 22, 309.
14. Lee, J.; Edgar, T. F. Phase Conditions for Stability of Multiloop Control Systems. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2000, 23, 1623.
15. Arkun, Y. Relative Sensitivity: A Dynamic Closed-Loop Interaction Measure and Design Tool. AIChE J. 1988, 34, 672.
16. Huang, H. P.; Ohshima, M.; Hashimoto, I. Dynamic Interaction and Multiloop Control System Design. J. Process Control 1994, 4, 15.
17. Landau, I. D.; Karimi, A.; Constantinescu, A. Direct Controller Order Reduction by Identification in Closed Loop. Automatica 2001, 37, 1689.
18. Seborg, D. E.; Edgar, T. F.; Mellichamp, D. A. Process Dynamics and Control; John Wiley and Sons: New York, 1989.
19. Morari, M.; Zafiriou, E. Robust Process Control; Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1989.
20. Skogestad, S.; Postlethwaite, I. Multivariable Feedback Control; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1996.
21. Tyreus, B. D.; Multivariable Control System Design for an Industrial Distillation Column. Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev. 1979, 18, 177.