Moral imagination in tissue engineering research on animal models

Biomaterials

Volumn 25, Issue 9, 2004, Pages 1723-1734

  Nordgren, Anders ^a  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Animal ethics; Animal experimentation; Animal models; Moral imagination; Tissue engineering

Indexed keywords

ENGINEERING RESEARCH; LAWS AND LEGISLATION; REGULATORY COMPLIANCE; SOCIAL ASPECTS; TISSUE;

PUBLIC OPINION; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

LIVING SYSTEMS STUDIES;

ETHICS; EXPERIMENTAL MODEL; LEGAL ASPECT; MORALITY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC OPINION; REVIEW; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 0347123662     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00506-4     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Nerem R., Sambanis A. Tissue engineering. from biology to biological substitutes Tissue Eng. 1:1995;3-13.
2. Johnson M. Moral imagination. Implications of cognitive science for ethics. 1993;University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
3. Nordgren A. Ethics and imagination. implications of cognitive semantics for medical ethics Theoret Med Bioethics. 19:1998;117-141.
4. Nordgren A. Responsible genetics the moral responsibility of geneticists for the consequences of human genetics research. Philosophy and Medicine Series, vol 70. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2001.
5. Johnson M. Moral imagination Implications of cognitive science for ethics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1993. p. 35-50.
6. Johnson M. Moral imagination. Implications of cognitive science for ethics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1993. p. 92, 189-92.
7. Johnson M. Moral imagination. Implications of cognitive science for ethics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1993. p. 198-203.
8. Regan T. The case for animal rights. 1983;University of California Press, Berkeley.
9. Cohen C., Regan T. The animal rights debate. 2001;Rowman & Littlefield Publications, Lanham.
10. Cohen C. The case for the use of animals in biomedical research. In: Erwin E, Gendin S, Kleiman L, editors. Ethical issues in scientific research. An anthology. New York: Garland Publications; 1994. p. 253-66.
11. Cohen C, Regan T. The animal rights debate. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publications; 2001. p. 55-6.
12. Cohen C, Regan T. The animal rights debate. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publications; 2001. p. 191-2, 200-4, 289-90.
13. Taylor P.W. Respect for nature. 1986;Princeton University Press, Princeton.
14. Stafleu F.R., Tramper R., Vorstenbosch J., Joles J.A. The ethical acceptability of animal experiments. a proposal for a system to support decision-making Laboratory Animals. 33:1999;295-303.
15. Cohen C, Regan T. The animal rights debate. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publications; 2001. p. 52-6, 246-8.
16. Singer P. Animal liberation. London: Pimlico; 1995 (1975).
17. Brody BA. The ethics of biomedical research. An international perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1998. p. 16-7.
18. Russell WMS, Burch RL. The principles of humane experimental technique. London: Methuen; 1992 (1959).
19. Petrinovich L. Darwinian dominion. Animal welfare and human interests. 1999;The MIT Press, Cambridge.
20. Nordgren A. Animal experimentation. pro and con arguments using the theory of evolution Med Health Care Philos. 5:2002;23-31.
21. Brody BA. The ethics of biomedical research. An international perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1998. p. 18-30.
22. Animals (scientific procedures) act. UK, 1986.
23. The animal welfare ordinance. Sweden, 1998, section 49.1.
24. Animals (scientific procedures) act. UK, 1986, section 5.4.
25. Directive on the protection of animals used for experimental and other scientific purposes. Council of the European Communities, 1986.
26. Principles for the utilization and care of vertebrate animals used in testing, research, and training. Public Health Service, US Government, 1986.
27. Animal welfare act. Department of Agriculture, USA, 1985.
28. Ethics of animal investigation. Canadian Councilon Animal Care, Canada, 1989.
29. Shrader-Frechette K. Ethics of scientific research. London: Rowman & Littlefield Publications; 1994. p. 9.
30. Nordgren A. Responsible genetics. The moral responsibility of geneticists for the consequences of human genetics research. Philosophy and Medicine Series, vol. 70. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2001. p. 66, 71, 82.
31. Aldhous P., Coghlan A., Copley J. Let the people speak. New Sci. 162:1999;26-31.
32. Biotechnology and the European Public Concerted Action Group. Europe ambivalent on biotechnology. Nature 1997;387:845-7.
33. Durant J, Bauer MW, Gaskell G, editors. Biotechnology in the public sphere. A European sourcebook. London: The Board of Trustees of the Science Museum; 1998.
34. Aframian D.J., Redman R.S., Yamano S., Nikolovski J., Cukierman E., Yamada K.M., Kriete M.F., Swaim W.D., Mooney D.J., Baum B.J. Tissue compatibility of two biogradable tubular scaffolds implanted adjacent to skin or buccal mucosa in mice. Tissue Eng. 8:2002;649-659.
35. Vitolo J.M., Baum B.J. The use of gene transfer for the protection and repair of salivary glands. Oral Dis. 8:2002;183-191.
36. Fox R.C., Swazey J.P. Spare parts. Organ replacement in American society. 1992;Oxford University Press, Oxford.
37. Omnell Persson M., Persson N.H., Ranstam J., Hermerén G. Attitudes toward xenotransplantation. patients waiting for transplantation versus the general public Transpl Int. 14:2001;334-342.
38. Baum B.J., Mooney D.J. The impact of tissue engineering on dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc. 131:2000;309-318.
39. Cavazzana-Calvo M., Hacein-Bey S., de Saint Basile G.et al. Gene therapy of human severe combined immuno-deficiency (SCID)-X1 disease. Science. 288:2000;669-672.
40. Carmen I.H. A death in the laboratory. the politics of the Gelsinger aftermath Mol Ther. 3:2001;425-428.
41. Nordgren A. Responsible genetics. The moral responsibility of geneticists for the consequences of human genetics research. Philosophy and Medicine Series, vol 70. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2001. p. 181-2.
42. Ryder R.D. Painism. some moral rules for the civilized experimenter Cambridge Q Healthcare Ethics. 8:1999;35-42.
43. Stokstad E. Humane science finds sharper and kinder tools. Science. 286:1999;1068-1071.
44. URL: www.cfn.se