Aesthetics and Emotion in Entertainment Media

Media Psychology

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 69-89

  Cupchik, Gerald C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0347120758     PISSN: 15213269     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s1532785xmep0301_04     Document Type: Review

References (58)

1. Arnheim, R. (1985). The other Gustav Theodor Fechner. In S. Koch & D. Leary, (Eds.), A century of psychology as science (pp. 856-865). New York: McGraw-Hill.
2. Arnheim, R. (1986). The trouble with wholes and parts. New Ideas in Psychology, 4, 281-284.
3. Averill, J. R. (in press). The rhetoric of emotion, with a note on what makes great literature great. Empirical Studies of the Arts.
4. Benjamin, W. (1967). The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction. In H. Arendt (Ed.), Illuminations (pp. 217-251). New York: Shocken Books.
5. Berger, A. A. (1980). Television as an instrument of terror: Essays on media, popular culture, and everyday life. New Brunswick, NJ: Transactions Books.
6. Berlyne, D. E. (1971). Aesthetics and psychobiology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
7. Berlyne, D. E. (Ed.). (1974). Studies in the new experimental aesthetics. Washington: Hemisphere.
8. Braun, I., & Cupchik, G. C. (in press). The phenomenology of absorption in literature. Empirical Studies of the Arts.
9. Bruner, J. S. (1961). The act of discovery. Harvard Educational Review, 31, 21-32.
10. Cupchik, G. C. (1994). Component and relational processing in aesthetics. Poetics, 22, 171-183.
11. Cupchik, G. C. (1995). Emotion in aesthetics: Reactive and reflective models. Poetics, 23, 177-188.
12. Cupchik, G. C., & Gebotys, R. J. (1990). Interest and pleasure as dimensions of aesthetic response. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 8(1), 1-14.
13. Cupchik, G. C., & Kemp, S. (2000). The aesthetics of media fare. In D. Zillmann & P. Vorderer (Eds.), Media entertainment: The psychology of its appeal (pp. 249-264). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14. Cupchik, G. C., & Laszlo, J. (1994). The landscape of time in literary reception: Character experience and narrative action. Cognition and Emotion, 8, 297-312.
15. Cupchik, G. C., Oatley, K., & Vorderer, P. (1998). Emotional effects of reading excerpts from short stories by James Joyce. Poetics, 25, 363-377.
16. Cupchik, G. C., & Saltzman, M. (1999). Recognition memory for serious and light rock music videos. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 17(1), 59-72.
17. Cupchik, G. C., & Shereck, L. (1998). Generating and receiving contextualized interpretations of sculptures. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 16(2), 179-191.
18. Cupchik, G. C., & Wroblewski-Raya, V. (1998). Loneliness as a theme in painting. Visual Arts Research, 24(1), 65-71.
19. Duffy, E. (1941). An explanation of "emotional" phenomena without use of the concept "emotion." Journal of General Psychology, 25, 283-293.
20. Eco, U. (1989). The open work. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1962)
21. Eliot, T. S. (1975). Tradition and the individual talent. In Frank Kermode (Ed.), Selected prose (pp. 37-44). London: Faber and Faber. (Original work published 1932)
22. Fechner, G. (1978). Die Vorschüle der Aesthetik (2 vols.). Hildesheim: Georg Holms. (Original work published 1876)
23. Fish, S. (1980). Is there a text in this class? The authority of interpretive communities. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
24. Fishwick, M. (1974). Parameters of popular culture. Bowling Green, KY: Bowling Green University Press.
25. Fornas, J. (1995). Cultural theory and late modernity. London: Sage.
26. Frank, L. K. (1939). Projective methods for the study of personality. The Journal of Psychology, 8, 389-413.
27. Garner, W. R. (1962). Uncertainty and structure as psychological concepts. New York: Wiley.
28. Getzels, J. W., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1976). The creative vision: A longitudinal study of problem finding in art. New York: Wiley.
29. Gombrich, E. H. (1960). Art and illusion: A study in the psychology of pictorial representation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
30. Goody, J. (1986). The logic of writing and the organization of society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31. Greenberg, C. (1957). Avant-garde and kitsch. In B. Rosenberg & D. W. White (Eds.), Mass culture: The popular arts in America (pp. 98-110). New York: The Free Press of Glencoe. (Original work published 1946)
32. Hochberg, J. (1986). Parts and wholes: A response to Arnheim. New Ideas in Psychology, 4, 285-293.
33. Holland, N. (1975). Five readers reading. New Haven: Yale University Press.
34. Hutcheson, F. (1725). An inquiry into the original of our ideas of beauty and virtue. London: D. Midwinter and others.
35. Iser, W. (1971). Indeterminacy and the reader's response in prose fiction. In J. H. Miller (Ed.), Aspects of narrative: Selected papers from the English institute (pp. 1-45). New York: Columbia University Press.
36. Iser, W. (1978). The act of reading. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
37. James, W. (1884). What is an emotion? Mind, 9, 188-205.
38. Kreitler, H., & Kreitler, S. (1972). The psychology of the arts. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
39. Larson, S. F., & Laszlo, J. (1990). Cultural-historical knowledge and personal experience in appreciation of literature. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 425-440.
40. Lowenthal, L. (1957/1950). Historical perspectives of popular culture. In B. Rosenberg & D. W. White (Eds.), Mass culture: The popular arts in America (pp. 46-58). New York: The Free Press of Glencoe.
41. Mandler, G. (1975). Mind and emotion. New York: Wiley.
42. McGuigan, J. (1992). Cultural populism. New York: Routledge.
43. Medved, M., & Cupchik, G. C. (2000). Interpretive recollections of art. Unpublished manuscript.
44. Moles, A. (1968). Information theory and esthetic perception. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press. (Original work published 1958)
45. Morris, W. (Ed.). (1969). The heritage illustrated dictionary of the English language: International edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
46. Schachter, S. (1966). The interaction of cognitive and physiological determinants of emotional state. In C. D. Spielberger (Ed.), Anxiety and behavior (pp. 193-224). New York: Academic.
47. Scheff, T. J. (1979). Catharsis in healing, ritual, and drama. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
48. Schmidt, S. J. (1982). Foundations for the empirical study of literature (R. de Beaugrande, trans.). Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag.
49. Shklovsky, V. (1988). Art as technique. In D. Lodge (Ed.), Modern criticism and theory (pp. 16-30). New York: Longman. (Original work published 1917)
50. Spiegel, S. (2000, August). Interactivity and involvement in large format digital cinema. Keynote address at the VIIth Congress of the International Society for the Empirical Study of Literature, Toronto, Canada.
51. Straus, E. W. (1958). Aesthesiology and hallucination. In R. May, E. Angel, & Henri F. Ellenberger (Eds.), Existence (pp. 139-169). New York: Basic Books.
52. Tan, E. (1995). Film-induced affect as a witness emotion. Poetics, 23, 7-32.
53. Van Peer, W. (1997). "High"/"low" cultural products and their social functions. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 15(1), 29-39.
54. Vorderer, E. (2000). Interactive entertainment and beyond. In D. Zillmann & P. Vorderer (Eds.), Media entertainment: The psychology of its appeal (pp. 21-36). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
55. Winston, A. S., & Cupchik, G. C. (1992). The evaluation of high art and popular art by naive and experienced viewers. Visual Arts Research, 18, 1-14.
56. Zillmann, D. (1983). Transfer of excitation in emotional behavior. In J. T. Cacioppo & R. E. Petty (Eds.), Social psychophysiology: A sourcebook (pp. 215-240). New York: Guilford.
57. Zillmann, D. (1995). Mechanisms of emotional involvement with drama. Poetics, 23, 33-51.
58. Zillmann, D. (1996). The psychology of suspense in dramatic exposition. In P. Vorderer, H. J. Wulff, & M. Friedrichsen (Eds.), Suspense: Conceptualizations, theoretical analyses, and empirical explorations (pp. 199-231). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.