The Area Proportion Distribution - Relationship with the Internal Structure of Mixels and Its Application to Image Classification

Systems and Computers in Japan

Volumn 31, Issue 4-6, 2000, Pages 57-76

  Kitamoto, Asanobu ^a   Takagi, Mikio ^b  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF INFORMATICS   (Japan)

^b TOKYO UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Area proportion; Beta distribution; Image classification; Mixel; Probabilistic model

Indexed keywords

EID: 0347117890     PISSN: 08821666     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1520-684x(200005)31:5<57::aid-scj6>3.0.co;2-1     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Kitamoto A, Takagi M. Image classification using probabilistic models that reflect the internal structure of mixels. Pattern Anal Appl 1999;2:31-43.
2. Kitamoto A, Takagi M. Image classification method using area proportion density that reflects the internal structure of mixels. Trans IEICE 1998;J81-D-II:2582-2597. (in Japanese)
3. Kitamoto A, Takagi M. Estimating the area proportions of mixels using mixture density estimation with mixel densities. Trans IEICE 1998;J81-D-II:1160-1172. (in Japanese)
4. Tabatabai AJ, Mitchell R. Edge location to subpixel values in digital imagery. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 1984;6:188-201.
5. Foody GM. Relating the land-cover composition of mixed pixels to artificial neural network classification output. Photogramm Eng Remote Sensing 1996;62:491-499.
6. Wang F. Fuzzy supervised classification of remote sensing images. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sensing 1990;28:194-201.
7. Kent JT, Mardia KV. Spatial classification using fuzzy membership models. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 1988;10:659-671.
8. Caillol H, Hillion A, Pieczynski W. Fuzzy random fields and unsupervised image segmentation. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sensing 1993; 31:801-810.
9. Settle JJ, Drake NA. Linear mixing and the estimation of ground cover proportions. Int J Remote Sensing 1993;14:1159-1177.
10. Santago P, Gage HD. Quantification of MR brain images by mixture density and partial volume modeling. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1993;12:566-574.
11. Choi HS, Haynor DR, Kim Y. Partial volume tissue classification of multichannel magnetic resonance images - A mixel model. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1991;10:395-408.
12. Bosdogianni P, Petrou M, Kittler J. Mixed pixel classification in remote sensing. SPIE Proc EUROPTO Ser, Image and Signal Processing for Remote Sensing 1994;215:494-505.
13. Chang FL, Coakley JA. Estimating errors in fractional cloud cover obtained with infrared threshold methods. J Geophys Res 1993;98:8825-8839.
14. Luo G. Simulations exploring the dependence of cloud-cover frequency distribution on cloud size and image pixel resolution. J Atmos Oceanic Technol 1995;12:712-720.
15. Mandelbrot BB. The fractal geometry of nature. Freeman; 1982.
16. Lovejoy S. Area-perimeter relation for rain and cloud areas. Science 1982;216:185-187.
17. Lovejoy S, Mandelbrot BB. Fractal properties of rain, and a fractal model. Tellus 1985;37A:209-232.
18. Voss RF. Random fractal forgeries. In: Earnshaw RA, editor. Fundamental algorithms for computer graphics. Springer-Verlag; 1985. p 805-835.
19. Feller W. An introduction to probability theory and its applications, Vol. 1. John Wiley & Sons; 1957.
20. Feller W. An introduction to probability theory and its applications, Vol. 2. John Wiley & Sons; 1966.
21. Falls LW. The Beta distribution: A statistical model for world cloud cover. J Geophys Res 1974;79:1261-1264.
22. Redner RA, Walker HF. Mixture densities, maximum likelihood and the EM algorithm. SIAM Rev 1984;26:195-239.
23. Akaike H. Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Petrov BN, Csaki F, editors. 2nd International Symposium on Information Theory, p 267-281, 1973.