Optimal universal disentangling machine for two-qubit quantum states

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 61, Issue 5, 2000, Pages 523011-523017

  Ghosh, Sibasish ^a   Bandyopadhyay, Somshubhro ^b   Roy, Anirban ^a   Sarkar, Debasis ^c,d   Kar, Guruprasad ^a  

^a INDIAN STATISTICAL INSTITUTE   (India)

^b BOSE INSTITUTE   (India)

^c Barrackpore Rastraguru S ^*  (India)

^d UNIVERSITY OF BURDWAN   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0347111153     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. T. Mor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1451 (1999).
2. D. Terno, Phys. Rev. A 59, 3320 (1999).
3. D. Bruß, D. P. DiVincenzo, A. Ekert, C. A. Fuchs, C. Macchiavello, and J. A. Smolin, Phys. Rev. A 57, 2368 (1998).
4. S. Bandyopadhyay, G. Kar, and A. Roy, Phys. Lett. A 258, 205 (1999).
5. A. Peres, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 1413 (1996).
6. M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, and R. Horodecki, Phys. Lett. A 223, 1 (1996).
7. M. Lewenstein and A. Sanpera, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2261 (1998).
8. 0)} = 0, as our requirement is to obtain universal disentangling machines, and it is known that such machines may exist provided 77 is less than 1 [1].
9. xy). But we try to see here how the universal disentangling machines work on this maximally entangled state.
10. V. Buzek and M. Hillery, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5003 (1998).
11. S. Ghosh, G. Kar, and A. Roy, Phys. Lett. A 261, 17 (1999).
12. S. Bandyopadhyay and G. Kar, Phys. Rev. A 60, 3296 (1999).
13. T. Mor and D. Terno, Phys. Rev. A 60, 4341 (1999).