Theoretical resolution of the H- resonance spectrum up to the n = 4 threshold. I. States of 1P0, 1D0, and 1F0 symmetries

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 61, Issue 5, 2000, Pages 525081-5250818

  Bylicki, Mirosław ^a   Nicolaides, Cleanthes A ^b,c  

^a NICOLAUS COPERNICUS UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

^b NATIONAL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

^c INSTITUTE OF BIOLOGY   (Greece)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0347111140     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (103)

1. M. Bylicki and C. A. Nicolaides, Phys. Rev. A 61, 052509 (2000).
2. M. Bylicki and C. A. Nicolaides, J. Phys. B 32, L317 (1999).
3. C. A. Nicolaides, Phys. Rev. A 6, 2078 (1972).
4. C. A. Nicolaides and D. R. Beck, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 14, 457 (1978).
5. Y. Komninos, G. Aspromallis, and C. A. Nicolaides, Phys. Rev. A 27, 1865 (1983).
6. C. A. Nicolaides and Th. Mercouris, Phys. Rev. A 32, 3247 (1985).
7. M. Chrysos, Y. Komninos, Th. Mercouris, and C. A. Nicolaides, Phys. Rev. A 42, 2634 (1990).
8. Th. Mercouris and C. A. Nicolaides, J. Phys. B 24, L557 (1991).
9. M. Bylicki and C. A. Nicolaides, Phys. Rev. A 48, 3589 (1993); M. Bylicki, S. I. Themelis, and C. A. Nicolaides, J. Phys. B 27, 2741 (1994).
10. M. Bylicki and C. A. Nicolaides, Phys. Rev. A 48, 3589 (1993); M. Bylicki, S. I. Themelis, and C. A. Nicolaides, J. Phys. B 27, 2741 (1994).
11. S. I. Themelis and C. A. Nicolaides, J. Phys. B 28, L379 (1995).
12. Th. Mercouris and C. A. Nicolaides, J. Phys. B 30, 811 (1997).
13. C. A. Nicolaides, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 71, 209 (1999); 60, 119 (1996).
14. C. A. Nicolaides, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 71, 209 (1999); 60, 119 (1996).
15. M. Gailitis and R. Damburg, Proc. Phys. Soc. London 82, 192 (1963); M. Gailitis, J. Phys. B 13, L479 (1980).
16. M. Gailitis and R. Damburg, Proc. Phys. Soc. London 82, 192 (1963); M. Gailitis, J. Phys. B 13, L479 (1980).
17. A. Temkin and J. F. Walker, Phys. Rev. A 140, A1520 (1965).
18. J. C. Y. Chen and M. Rotenberg, Phys. Rev. 166, 7 (1968).
19. M. Rotenberg and M. R. Cordes, J. Phys. B 5, 2225 (1972).
20. A. Pathak, P. G. Burke, and K. A. Berrington, J. Phys. B 22, 2759 (1989).
21. M. Gailitis and R. Damburg [13] pointed out that in fact the series of the dipole resonances terminate because of the lifting of the hydrogen degeneracy caused by the relativistic splitting. A related comment is given in our Sec. IV.
22. N. A. Piangos and C. A. Nicolaides, J. Phys. B 31, L147 (1998).
23. M. Halka, H. C. Bryant, E. P. Mackerrow, W. Miller, A. H. Mohagheghi, C. Y. Tang, S. Cohen, J. B. Donahue, A. Hsu, C. R. Quick, J. Tiee, and K. Rozsa, Phys. Rev. A 44, 6127 (1991).
24. H. H. Andersen, P. Balling, P. Kristensen, U. V. Pedersen, S. A. Aseyev, V. V. Petrunin, and T. Andersen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 4770 (1997).
25. A. Stintz, X. M. Zhao, C. E. M. Strauss, W. B. Ingalls, G. A. Kyrala, D. J. Funk, and H. C. Bryant, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 2924 (1995).
26. - is -0.5277510 a.u. [G. W. Drake, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 31, 7 (1988)].
27. J. W. McGowan, Phys. Rev. 156, 165 (1967); J. W. McGowan, J. F. Williams, and E. K. Curley, ibid. 180, 132 (1969).
28. J. W. McGowan, Phys. Rev. 156, 165 (1967); J. W. McGowan, J. F. Williams, and E. K. Curley, ibid. 180, 132 (1969).
29. G. J. Schulz, Rev. Mod. Phys. 45, 378 (1973).
30. J. S. Risley, A. K. Edwards, and R. Geballe, Phys. Rev. A 9, 1115 (1974).
31. J. F. Williams, in Progress in Atomic Spectroscopy, edited by W. Hanle and H. Kleinpoppen (Plenum Press, New York, 1979), p. 1031.
32. C. D. Warner, G. C. King, P. Hammond, and J. Slevin, J. Phys. B 19, 3297 (1986); C. D. Warner, P. M. Rutter, and G. C. King, ibid. 23, 93 (1990).
33. C. D. Warner, G. C. King, P. Hammond, and J. Slevin, J. Phys. B 19, 3297 (1986); C. D. Warner, P. M. Rutter, and G. C. King, ibid. 23, 93 (1990).
34. J. F. Williams, J. Phys. B 21, 2107 (1988).
35. E. Träbert, P. H. Heckmann, J. Doerfert, and J. Granzow, J. Phys. B 25, L353 (1992).
36. Y. Komninos and C. A. Nicolaides, J. Phys. B 30, L237 (1997).
37. L. Sanche and P. D. Burrow, Phys. Rev. Lett. 29, 1639 (1972).
38. S. J. Buckman and C. W. Clark, Rev. Mod. Phys. 66, 539 (1994).
39. A. Pathak, A. E. Kingston, and K. A. Berrington, J. Phys. B 21, 2939 (1988).
40. B. R. Odgers, M. P. Scott, and P. G. Burke, J. Phys. B 28, 2973 (1995).
41. H. R. Sadeghpour, C. H. Greene, and M. Cavagnero, Phys. Rev. A 45, 1587 (1992);
42. H. R. Sadeghpour and C. H. Greene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 313 (1990).
43. Y. K. Ho, Phys. Rev. A 23, 2137 (1981).
44. Y. K. Ho, Chin, J. Phys. (Taipei) 29, 327 (1991).
45. T. F. O'Malley and S. Geltman, Phys. Rev. 137, A1344 (1965).
46. G. J. Seiler, R. S. Oberoi, and J. Callaway, Phys. Rev. A 3, 2006 (1971).
47. M. Cortés and F. Martín, Phys. Rev. A 48, 1227 (1993).
48. M. Venuti and P. Decleva, J. Phys. B 30, 4839 (1997).
49. E. Lindroth, A. Bürgers, and N. Brandefelt, Phys. Rev. A 57, R685 (1998).
50. T. Purr and H. Friedrich, Phys. Rev. A 57, 4279 (1998).
51. T. T. Gien, J. Phys. B 31, L1001 (1998).
52. 0 resonances have been predicted, e.g., between n = 4 and 7, by J. Z. Tang and I. Shimamura, Phys. Rev. A 51, R1738 (1995). This paper pays attention to the Wannier states up to the n = 7 threshold. Such results were obtained much earlier by C. A. Nicolaides and Y. Komninos, [ibid. 35, 999 (1987)] for the Wannier states up to the n =10 threshold.
53. 0 resonances have been predicted, e.g., between n = 4 and 7, by J. Z. Tang and I. Shimamura, Phys. Rev. A 51, R1738 (1995). This paper pays attention to the Wannier states up to the n = 7 threshold. Such results were obtained much earlier by C. A. Nicolaides and Y. Komninos, [ibid. 35, 999 (1987)] for the Wannier states up to the n =10 threshold.
54. M. Chrysos, Y. Komninos, and C. A. Nicolaides, J. Phys. B 25, 1977 (1992).
55. L. A. Morgan, M. R. C. McDowell, and J. Callaway, J. Phys. B 10, 3297 (1977).
56. J. Callaway, Phys. Rev. A 26, 199 (1982).
57. J. Callaway, Phys. Rev. A 37, 3692 (1988).
58. L. Lipsky, R. Anania, and M. J. Connelly, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 20, 127 (1977).
59. The use of unoptimized bound hydrogenic functions in a single diagonalization without the contribution of the open channels cannot establish the correspondence of a root with a resonance state.
60. G. D. Doolen, J. Nuttal, and R. W. Stagat, Phys. Rev. A 10, 1612 (1974).
61. G. D. Doolen, J. Phys. B 8, 525 (1975).
62. G. D. Doolen, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 14, 523 (1978).
63. Y. K. Ho and J. Callaway, Phys. Rev. A 34, 130 (1986).
64. Y. K. Ho, Phys. Lett. A 189, 374 (1994).
65. A. K. Bhatia and Y. K. Ho, Phys. Rev. A 50, 4886 (1994).
66. C. A. Nicolaides, N. Makri, and Y. Komninos, J. Phys. B 20, 4963 (1987).
67. Y. Komninos and C. A. Nicolaides, Phys. Rev. A 50, 3782 (1994).
68. C. Haritos, Th. Mercouris, and C. A. Nieolaides, J. Phys. B 31, L783 (1998).
69. Y. Komninos, S. I. Themelis, M. Chrysos, and C. A. Nicolaides, Int. J. Quantum Chem., Symp. 27, 399 (1993).
70. M. Bylicki, J. Phys. B 30, 189 (1997).
71. M. Bylicki and C. A. Nicolaides, J. Phys. B 31, L685 (1998).
72. U. Fano, Phys. Rev. 124, 1866 (1961).
73. H. Feshbach, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 19, 287 (1962).
74. C. A. Nicolaides, Y. Komninos, and Th. Mercouris, Int. J. Quantum Chem., Symp. 15, 355 (1981).
75. C. A. Nicolaides and S. I. Themelis, Phys. Rev. A 45, 349 (1992); S. I. Themelis and C. A. Nicolaides, ibid 59, 2500 (1999).
76. C. A. Nicolaides and S. I. Themelis, Phys. Rev. A 45, 349 (1992); S. I. Themelis and C. A. Nicolaides, ibid 59, 2500 (1999).
77. A. F. J. Siegert, Phys. Rev. 56, 750 (1939).
78. E. C. Kemble, The Fundamental Principles of Quantum Mechanics (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1937), Sec. 31f.
79. Ya. B. Zel'dovich, Zh. Éksp. Teor. Fiz. 39, 776 (1960) [Sov. Phys. JETP 12, 542 (1961)].
80. Ya. B. Zel'dovich, Zh. Éksp. Teor. Fiz. 39, 776 (1960) [Sov. Phys. JETP 12, 542 (1961)].
81. T. Berggren, Nucl. Phys. A 109, 265 (1968).
82. A. M. Dykhne and A. V. Chaplik, Zh. Éksp. Teor. Fiz. 40, 1427 (1961) [Sov. Phys. JETP 13, 1002 (1961)].
83. A. M. Dykhne and A. V. Chaplik, Zh. Éksp. Teor. Fiz. 40, 1427 (1961) [Sov. Phys. JETP 13, 1002 (1961)].
84. J. Aguilar and J. M. Combes, Commun. Math. Phys. 22, 269 (1972).
85. E. Balslev and J. M. Combes, Commun. Math. Phys. 22, 280 (1972).
86. B. Simon, Commun. Math. Phys. 27, 1 (1972).
87. R. A. Bain, J. N. Bardsley, B. R. Junker, and C. V. Sukumar, J. Phys. 87, 2189 (1974).
88. C. A. Nicolaides and D. R. Beck, Phys. Lett. 65A, 11 (1978); C. A. Nicolaides, H. J. Gotsis, M. Chrysos, and Y. Komninos, Chem. Phys. Lett. 168, 570 (1990).
89. C. A. Nicolaides and D. R. Beck, Phys. Lett. 65A, 11 (1978); C. A. Nicolaides, H. J. Gotsis, M. Chrysos, and Y. Komninos, Chem. Phys. Lett. 168, 570 (1990).
90. D. R. Herrick and O. Sinanoǧlu, Phys. Rev. A 11, 97 (1975).
91. D. R. Herrick, Phys. Rev. A 12, 413 (1975).
92. S. I. Nikitin and V. N. Ostrovsky, J. Phys. B 9, 3141 (1976).
93. D. R. Herrick, M. E. Kellman, and R. D. Poliak, Phys. Rev. A 22, 1517 (1980).
94. C. D. Lin, Adv. At. Mol. Phys. 22, 77 (1986).
95. J. M. Rost and J. S. Briggs, J. Phys. B 24, 4293 (1991).
96. T. Purr, H. Friedrich, and A. T. Stelbovics, Phys. Rev. A 57, 308 (1998).
97. Y. K. Ho and A. K. Bhatia, Phys. Rev. A 48, 3720 (1993).
98. Y. K. Ho, Phys. Rev. A 45, 148 (1992).
99. E. Lindroth, Phys. Rev. A 52, 2737 (1995).
100. H. C. Bryant, D. A. Clark, K. B. Butterfield, C. A. Frost, H. Sharifian, H. Tootoonchi, J. B. Donahue, P. A. M. Gram, M. E. Hamm, R. W. Hamm, J. C. Pratt, M. A. Yates, and W. W. Smith, Phys. Rev. A 27, 2889 (1983).
101. M. Halka, H. C. Bryant, C. Johnstone, B. Marchini, W. Miller, A. H. Mohagheghi, C. Y. Tang, K. B. Butterfield, D. A. Clark, S. Cohen, J. B. Donahue, P. A. M. Gram, R. W. Hamm, A. Hsu, D. W. MacArthur, E. P. MacKerrow, C. R. Quick, J. Tiee, and K. Rózsa, Phys. Rev. A 46, 6942 (1992).
102. J. J. Wendoloski and W. P. Reinhardt, Phys. Rev. A 17, 195 (1978).
103. Tables containing the wave-function characteristics for all the states under consideration can be obtained from ftp://ftp.phys.uni.torun.pl/pub/publications/ifiz/mirekb/H_/tab_I.ps.