Inquisitorial jury selection through scientific support

Advances in Psychology and Law: International Contributions

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 206-214

  Arce, Ramón ^a   Fariña, Francisca ^b   Vila, Carlos ^b   Real, Santiago ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SANTIAGO DE COMPOSTELA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VIGO   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0347103166     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1515/9783110801163     Document Type: Chapter

References (39)

1. Academie de Lyon (1975). Jury criminal l'Ain: Enquete de sociologie judiciaire. Institut d'Etudes Judiciaires.
2. Adkins, J. C. (1968-1969). An art? A science? Or luck?. Trial, December-January, 37-39.
3. Appleman, J. A. (1952). Sucessfuljury trials: A symposium. Indianapolis:Bobbs Merrill.
4. Arce, R. (1989). Perfiles psicosociales, veredictos y deliberacion en jurados legos. Doctoral thesis, University of Santiago de Compostela.
5. Arce, R., Farina, F., & Real, S. (in press). Perfiles psicosociales y estilos de deliberacion. Cognitiva.
6. Arce, R., Farina, F., & Sobral, J. (1992a). Verdicts of psychosocial biased juries. In F. Lösel, D. Bender, & T. Bliesener (Eds.). Psychology and law.International Perspectives, 435-439. Berlin: De Gruyter.
7. Arce, R., Farina, F., & Sobral, J. (1992b). From juror to jury decision making. A non model approach. Third European Conference on Law and Psychology, Oxford.
8. Arce, R., Farina, F., & Vila, C. (in press). Anälisis de contenido en la interaccion de jurados legos. Anälisis y Modificacion de Conducta.
9. Balch, R. W., Griffiths, C. T., Hall, E. L., & Winfree, L. T. (1976). The socialization of jurors. The voir dire as a rite of passage. Journal of Criminal Justice, 4, 271-283.
10. Belli, A. M. (1954). Modern trials. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
11. Broeder, D. (1965). Voir Dire examination: An empirical study. Southern California Law Review, 38, 503-528.
12. Cowan, C. L., Thompson, W. C., & Ellsworth, P. C. (1984). The effects of death qualification on jurors predisposition to convict and on the quality of deliberation. Law and Human Behavior, 5(1/2), 53-79.
13. Cox, M, & Tanford, S. (1989). An alternative method of capital jury selection. Law and Human Behavior, 13(2), 167-183.
14. Fukurai, H., Butler, E. W., & Krooth, R. (1991). Where did black jurors go? A theoretical synthesis of racial disenfranchisement in the jury system and jury selection. Journal of Black Studies, 22(2), 196-215.
15. Fulero, S. M., & Penrod, S. D. (1990). Attorney jury selection folklore: What do they think and how can psychologists help? Forensic Reports, 3(3), 233-259.
16. Golash, D. (1992). Race, fairness, and jury selection. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 10(2), 155-177.
17. Graziano, S. J., Panter, A. T., & Tanaka, J. S. (1990). Individual differences in information processing strategies and their role in juror decision making and selection. Forensic Reports, 3(3), 279-301.
18. Hans, V. P. & Vidmar, N. (1986). Judging the jury. New York: Plenum Press.
19. Hastie, R. (1991). Is attorney conducted voir dire an effective procedure for the selection of impartial juries. American University Law Review, 40, 703-726.
20. Hastie, R., Penrod, S., & Pennington (1983). Inside the jury. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
21. Horowitz, A. (1980). Juror selection: A comparison of two methods in several criminal cases. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 10,1, 86-99.
22. Jones, S. E. (1987). Judge-versus attorney-conducted voir dire: An empirical investigation of juror candor. Law and Human Behavior, 11(2), 131-146.
23. Kalven, H., & Zeisel, H. (1966). The American jury. Boston: Little Brown.
24. Kaplan, M. F., & Miller, J. H. (1978). Reducing the effects of juror bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1443-1455.
25. Kuhn, R. S. (1968). Jury discrimination: The next phase. Southern California Law Review, 41, 235-328.
26. Lempert, R. O. (1975). Uncovering "nondiscernible" differences: Empirical research and the jurysize cases. Michigan Law Review, 73, 4, 643-708.
27. Lennox, R. D. (1990). Applications of structural equation methodologies to jury-selection research. Forensic Reports, 3(3), 349-360.
28. Luginbuhl, J., & Middendorf, K. (1988). Death penalty beliefs and jurors' responses to aggravating and mitigating circumstances in capital trials. Law and Human Behavior, 12(3), 263-281.
29. MacCoun, R. J., & Kerr, N. L. (1988). Asymmetric influence in mock jury deliberation: Jurors' bias for leniency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(1), 21-33.
30. Marshall, L. L., & Smith, A. (1986). The effects of demand characteristics, evaluation anxiety, and expectancy on juror honesty during voir dire. Journal of Psychology, 120(3), 205-217.
31. Moran, G., Cutler, B. L., & Loftus, E. F. (1990). Jury selection in major controlled substance trials: The need for extended voir dire. Forensic Reports, 3(3), 331-348.
32. Olczak, P. V., Kaplan, M. F., & Penrod, S. D. (1991). Attorneys' lay psychology and its effectiveness in selecting jurors: Three empirical studies. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 6(3), 431-452.
33. Penrod, S. D. (1990). Predictors of jury decision making in criminal and civil cases: A field experiment. Forensic Reports, 3(3), 261-277.
34. Press, J. S. (1992). La estadistica en la selecciön de jurados: Como evitar jurados adversos. In J. M. Tanur (Ed.). La estadistica: Una gutade lo desconocido. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
35. Scliulman, J., Shaver, P., Colman, R., Emrick, B., & Christie, R. (1973). Recipe for a jury. Psychology Today, 37-44, 79-84.
36. Sobal, J. & Hinrichs, D. W. (1986). Bias against "marginal" individuals injury wheel selection. Journal of Criminal Justice, 14(1), 71-89.
37. Van Dyke, J. M. (1977). Jury selection procedures: our uncertain commitments to representative panels. Cambridge, Mass. Ballinger Publishing Company.
38. Wyer, R. S. Jr., & Srull, T. K. (1989). Memory and cognition in its social context. Hillsdale, N.J.: LEA.
39. Zeisel, H. (1971). And then there were none: The diminution of the federal jury. University of Chicago Law Review, 38 (4), 710-724.