Selective Retention of Information about the Superficial Form of Text: Ellipses with Antecedents in Main and Subordinate Clauses

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology

Volumn 51, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 19-39

  Garnham, Alan ^a   Oakhill, Jane ^a   Cain, Kate ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0347091224     PISSN: 02724987     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/713755747     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Begg, I. (1971). Recognition memory for sentence meaning and wording. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10, 176-181.
2. Bever, T.G., & Townsend, D.J. (1979). Perceptual mechanisms and formal properties of main and subordinate clauses. In W.E. Cooper & E.C.T. Walker (Eds.), Sentence processing: Psycholinguistic studies presented to Merrill Garrett (pp. 159-226). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
3. Caplan, D. (1972). Clause boundaries and recognition latencies for words in sentences. Perception and Psychophysics, 12, 73-76.
4. Garnham, A. (1987). Effects of antecedent distance and intervening text structure in the interpretation of ellipses. Language and Speech, 30, 59-68.
5. Garnham, A., & Oakhill, J.V. (1987). Interpreting elliptical verb phrases. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39A, 611-627.
6. Gernsbacher, M.A. (1990). Language processing as structure building. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
7. Hankamer, J., & Sag, I. (1976). Deep and surface anaphora. Linguistic Inquiry, 7, 391-428.
8. Jarvella, R.J. (1971). Syntactic processing of connected speech. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10, 409-416.
9. Johnson-Laird, P.N., & Stevenson, R. (1970). Memory for syntax. Nature, 227, 412.
10. Lombardi, L., & Potter, M.C. (1992). The regeneration of syntax in short term memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 713-733.
11. Malt, B.C. (1985). The role of discourse structure in understanding anaphora. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 271-289.
12. Mauner, G., Tanenhaus, M.K., & Carlson, G.N. (1995). A note on parallelism in processing deep and surface verb-phrase anaphora. Language and Cognitive Processes, 10, 1-12.
13. Murphy, G.L. (1985). Processes of understanding anaphora. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 290-303.
14. Norris, D. (1984). A computed-based programmable tachistoscope for nonprogrammers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 16, 25-27.
15. Potter, M.C., & Lombardi, L. (1990). Regeneration in the short-term recall of sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 633-654.
16. Sag, I., 82 Hankamer, J. (1984). Toward a theory of anaphoric processing. Linguistics and Philosophy, 7, 325-345.
17. Tanenhaus, M.K., & Carlson, G.N. (1990). Comprehension of deep and surface anaphors. Language and Cognitive Processes, 5, 257-280.
18. Townsend, D.J. (1983). Thematic processing in sentences and texts. Cognition, 13, 223-261.
19. Townsend, D.J., & Bever, T.G. (1978). Interclause relations and clausal processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 17, 509-521.
20. Townsend, D.J., & Bever, T.G. (1982). Natural units of representation interact during sentence comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 21, 688-703.