The cooperative research program in first-grade reading instruction

Reading Research Quarterly

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 348-427

  Bond, Guy L ^a   Dykstra, Robert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0347053005     PISSN: 00340553     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1598/RRQ.32.4.4     Document Type: Article

References (100)

1. AGNEW, D.C. The effect of varied amount of phonetic training on primary reading. Duke University Research Studies in Education, no. 5. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press, 1939.
2. ALLEN, R.V. The language experience approach. In W.G. Cutts (Ed.) Teaching voting children to read. Washington, D.C.: Office of Education, U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, 1964, 59-67.
3. ALLEN, R.V., & SAN DIEGO PUBLIC SCHOOLS. Three approaches to teaching reading. In Challenge and experiment in reading. Proceedings of the International Reading Association, 1962, 7, 153-154.
4. ANDERSON, I.H., et al. Age of learning to read and its relation to sex, intelligence and reading achievement in the sixth grade. Journal of Educational Research, 1956, 49, 447-453. (a)
5. ANDERSON, I.H. The relationship between reading achievement and the method of teaching reading. University of Michigan School of Education Bulletin, 1956, 27, 104-108. (b)
6. AUSTIN, MARY C., & MORRISON, C. The first r: The Harvard report on reading in elementary schools. New York: Macmillan, 1963.
7. BALOW, I.H. Sex difference in first grade reading. Elementary English, 1963, 40, 303-306.
8. BEAR, D.E. Phonics for first grade: A comparison of two methods. Elementary School Journal, 1959, 59, 394-402.
9. BEAR, D.E. Two methods of teaching phonics: A longitudinal study. Elementary School Journal, 1964, 64, 273-279.
10. BETTS, E.A., & WELCH, CAROLYN M. Betts basal readers. (3rd ed.) New York: American Book Company, 1963.
11. BLIESMER, E.P., & YARBOROUGH, BETTY H. A comparison of ten different beginning reading programs in first grade. Phi Delta Kappan, 1965, 46, 500-504.
12. BLOOMER, R. An investigation of an experimental first-grade phonics program. Journal of Educational Research, 1960, 53, 188-193.
13. BLOOMFIELD, L., & BARNHART, C.L. Let's read. Bronxville, N.Y.: C.L. Barnhart, Inc., 1963.
14. BOND, G.L., & DYKSTRA, R. Coordinating Center for first-grade reading instruction programs. (Final Report of Project No. X-001, Contract No. OE-5-10-264) Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, 1967.
15. BUCHANAN, CYNTHIA D. Programmed reading. New York: McGraw Hill, 1963.
16. BUMPASS, FAY L. We learn English series. New York: American Book Company, 1963.
17. BUSWELL, G.T. Fundamental reading habits: A study of their development. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1922.
18. CARLINE, D.E. An investigation of individualized reading and basal text reading through pupil achievement and teacher performance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Pennsylvania State University, 1960.
19. CARROLL, MARJORIE W. Sex differences in reading readiness at the first grade level. Elementary English, 1948, 25, 370-375.
20. CHASNOFF, R.E. Comparison of the initial teaching alphabet with the traditional alphabet in first grade reading. (Report of Cooperative Research project no. S-210) Washington, D.C.: U.S. Office of Education, 1965.
21. CLYMER, T., & ROBINSON, HELEN M. Reading. Review of Educational Research, 1961, 31, 130-144.
22. DAVIS, D.C. Phonemic structural approach to initial reading instruction. Elementary English, 1964, 41, 218-223.
23. DIACK, H., & DANIELS, J.C. The royal road readers. London: Chatto & Windus, 1960.
24. DOLAN, SISTER MARY EDWARD. A modified linguistic versus a composite basal reading program. The Reading Teacher, 1964, 17, 511-515.
25. DOLCH, E.W., & BLOOMSTER, M. Phonic readiness. Elementary School Journal, 1937, 38, 201-205.
26. DOWNING, J.A. Downing readers. London: Initial Teaching Publishing Company, 1963.
27. DOWNING, J.A. Experiments with Pitman's initial teaching alphabet in British schools. London: Initial Teaching Publishing Company, 1963.
28. DOWNING, J.A. The intial teaching alphabet. New York: Macmillan, 1964.
29. DOWNING, J.A. Teaching reading with i.t.a. in Britain. Phi Delta Kappan, 1964, 45, 322-329.
30. FIDELIA, SISTER MARY. The relative effectiveness of Bloomfield's linguistic approach to word attack as compared with Phonics we use. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Ottawa, 1959.
31. FRIES, C.C. et al. A basic reading series developed upon linguistic principles. Columbus, Ohio: Merrill, 1963-65.
32. FRIES, C.C. Linguistics and reading. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1962.
33. FRY, E.B. Phonetically regular words oral reading test. (Designed for the U.S. Office of Education Studies.) New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University, 1964.
34. GATES, A.I. Gates word pronunciation test. (Adapted for the U.S. Office of Education Studies from the Gates Reading Diagnostic Tests.) New York: Bureau of Publications, Teachers College, Columbia University, 1942.
35. GATES, A.I. Results of teaching a system of phonics. The Reading Teacher, 1961, 14, 248-252. (a)
36. GATES, A.I. Sex differences in reading ability. Elementary School Journal, 1961, 61, 431-434. (b)
37. GATES, A.I., & RUSSELL, D.H. Types of materials, vocabulary burden, word analysis, and other factors in beginning reading. I and II. Elementary School Journal, 1938, 39, 119-128.
38. GATES, A.I., et al. A modern systematic versus an opportunistic method of teaching: An experimental study. Teachers College Record, 1926, 27, 679-700.
39. GIBBONS, HELEN D. Reading and sentence elements. Elementary English Review, 1941, 18, 42-46.
40. GILMORE, J.U. Gilmore oral reading test, form A. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, 1951.
41. GOLDBERG, LYNN, & RASMUSSEN, D. Linguistics and reading. Elementary English, 1963, 40, 242-247.
42. GRAY, W.S. The teaching of reading. In Encyclopedia of Educational Research. New York: Macmillan, 1960, Pp. 1114-1135.
43. GROFF, P.J. Materials for individualized reading. Elementary English, 1961, 38, 1-7.
44. GUNDERSON, DORIS V. Research in reading at the primary level. (Final report of contract OE-30008) Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, 1963.
45. GUNDERSON, DORIS V. Research in reading readiness. (Final report of contract OE-30013) Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, 1964.
46. HARRINGTON, SISTER MARY J., & DURRELL, D.D. Mental maturity versus perception abilities in primary reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1955, 46, 375-380.
47. HARRIS, T.L. Summary of investigations relating to reading. Journal of Educational Research, 1964, 57, 283-336.
48. HEILMAN, A.W. Teaching reading. Columbus, Ohio: Merrill, 1961.
49. HILDRETH, GERTRUDE, et al. Metropolitan readiness test. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, 1964.
50. HOLMES, J.A., & SINGER, H. Theoretical models and trends toward more basic research in reading. Review of Educational Research, 1964, 34, 127-150.
51. JOHNSON, ELEANOR M., SINGLETON, C. & WONSAVAGE, ELAINE. Phonics and word power. Program I. Columbus: American Education Publications, 1964.
52. LOBAN, W.D. The language of elementary school children. Champaign, Illinois: National Council of Teachers of English, 1963.
53. MAC KINNON, A.R. How do children learn to read. Vancouver: Copp Clark, 1959.
54. MAZURKIEWICZ, A.J. Teaching reacting in America using the initial teaching alphabet. Elementary English, 1964, 41, 766-772.
55. MC CRACKEN, G., & WALCUTT, C.C. Basic reading. New York: J.B. Lippincott, 1963.
56. MC CRISTY, ANTOINETTE. A comparative study to determine whether self-selective reading can be successfully used at second grade. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Southern California at Los Angeles, 1957.
57. MC DOWELL, REV. J.B. Report on the phonic method of teaching children to read. Catholic Education Review, 1953, 51, 506-519.
58. MC KEE, P., et al. Reading for meaning. (4th ed.) Boston: Houghton-Mifflin, 1966.
59. MORGAN, E.F., JR., & LIGHT, M. A statistical evaluation of two programs of reading instruction. Journal of Educational Research, 1963, 57, 99-101.
60. MORRONE, V.E. A critical analysis of scientific research in phonics. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh, 1958.
61. MURPHY, HELEN, & DURRELL, D. Murphy-Durrell diagnostic reading readiness test. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, 1964.
62. MURPHY, HELEN, & DURRELL, D. Speech to print phonics. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, 1965.
63. NEW YORK, THE UNIVERSITY OF THE STATE OF. THE STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, DIVISION OF RESEARCH. A critical review of research and opinion on phonics. New York: Author, 1963.
64. OGELSBY, ELIZA F. Detroit word recognition test. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, 1953.
65. OLSON, A.V. Growth in word perception abilities as it relates to success in beginning reading. Journal of Education, 1958, 140, 25-36.
66. OUSLEY, ODILLE, & RUSSELL, D.H. Ginn basic readers. (Revised ed.) Boston: Ginn & Co., 1964.
67. PAULEY, F.R. Sex differences and legal school entrance age. Journal of Educational Research, 1951, 45, 1-9.
68. PINTNER, R., et al. Pintner-Cunningham primary test, form A. (General ability tests, revised.) New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, 1946.
69. PRESCOTT, G.A. Sex differences in Metropolitan Readiness Test results. Journal of Educational Research, 1955, 48, 605-610.
70. PRESTON, R.C. Reading achievement of German and American children. School and Society, 1962, 90, 350-354.
71. ROBINSON, HELEN M. Summary of investigations relating to reading. The Reading Teacher, 1964, 17, 326-392.
72. ROBINSON, HELEN M., MONROE, MARION, ARTLEY, A.S., & GREET, W.C. The new basic readers. Chicago: Scott-Foresman, 1960-62.
73. RUDDELL, R.B. An investigation of the effect of the similarity of oral and written patterns of language structure on reading comprehension. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, 1963.
74. RUDISILL, MABEL. Interrelations of functional phonic knowledge, reading, spelling and mental age. Elementary School Journal, 1957, 57, 264-267.
75. RUSSELL, D.H., & FEA, H. Research on teaching reading. In N.L. Gage (Ed.) Handbook of research on teaching. Chicago: Rand, McNally, 1963. Pp. 865-928.
76. SAFFORD, A.L. Evaluation of an individualized reading program. The Reading Teacher, 1960, 13, 266-270.
77. SAN DIEGO COUNTY, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, READING STUDY PROJECT COMMITTEE. An inventory of reading attitudes. Monograph, no. 4. San Diego: Author, 1961.
78. SAN DIEGO COUNTY, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, READING STUDY PROJECT COMMITTEE. Teacher inventory of approaches to the teaching of reading. Monograph, no. 3. San Diego: Author, 1961.
79. SARTAIN, H.W. The Roseville experiment with individualized reading. The Reading Teacher, 1960, 13, 277-281.
80. SHANE, H.G., & MULRY, JUNE G. Improving language arts instruction through research. Washington, D.C.: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, NEA, 1963.
81. SHELDON, W.D., et al. Sheldon basic readers. New York: Allyn & Bacon, 1957.
82. SPARKS, P.E., & FAY, L.C. An evaluation of two methods of teaching reading. Elementary School Journal, 1957, 57, 386-390.
83. SPERRY, FLORENCE. What research says about individualized reading. Proceedings of the Claremont Reading Conferences, 1961, 16.
84. STERN, CATHERINE, et al. Structural reading series. Syracuse, New York: L.W. Singer, 1963.
85. STEWART, D.K. Values and limitations of basal readers. Materials for Reading, 1957, no. 86.
86. STEWART, REBECCA W. i.t.a. - after two years. Elementary English, 1965, 42, 660-665.
87. STRATEMEYER, CLARA, & SMITH, H.L., JR. The linguistic science readers. Evanston, Illinois: Harper and Row, 1963.
88. STRICKLAND, RUTH G. Implications of research in linguistics for elementary teaching. Elementary English, 1963, 40, 168-171.
89. STRICKLAND, RUTH G. The language of elementary school children: Its relationship to the language of reading textbooks and the quality of reading selected children. Bulletin of the School of Education, Indiana University, 1962, 38(4).
90. STROUD, J.B., & LINDQUIST, E.F. Sex differences in achievement in the elementary and secondary school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1942, 33, 657-667.
91. TANYZER, H.J., & MAZURKIEWICZ, A.J. Early to read i.t.a. program. New York: i/t/a Publications, 1964.
92. TATE, H. The influence of phonics on silent reading in grade I. Elementary School Journal, 1937, 37, 752-763.
93. TEMPLIN, MILDRED C. Certain language skills in children. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1957.
94. TENSUAN, E., & DAVIS, F. Phonic method vs. combination method in teaching beginning reading. Reading Newsletter, 1963.
95. THURSTONE, L.L., & JEFFREY, T.E. Identical forms test. Chapel Hill: Psychometric Laboratory, University of North Carolina, 1956.
96. THURSTONE, THELMA G. Thurstone pattern copying test. Unpublished manuscript, University of North Carolina.
97. TIFFIN, J., & MCKINNIS, M. Phonic ability: Its measurement and relation to reading ability. School and Society, 1940, 51, 190-192.
98. TRUMAN, K.L., et al. Stanford achievement test, primary I level, form X. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, 1964.
99. WAETJEN, W.B., & BRAMBS, JEAN D. Sex differences: A case of educational evasion? Teachers College Record, 1963, 65, 261-271.
100. ZIRBES, LAURA, et al. Practice exercises and checks on silent reading in the primary grades. New York: Columbia University, 1925.