Exact results for the thermal and magnetic properties of strong coupling ladder compounds

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 91, Issue 21, 2003, Pages

  Batchelor, Murray T ^a   Guan, Xi Wen ^a   Oelkers, Norman ^a   Sakai, Kazumitsu ^b   Tsuboi, Zengo ^b   Foerster, Angela ^c  

^a AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^c FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO GRANDE DO SUL   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; EIGENVALUES AND EIGENFUNCTIONS; ENERGY GAP; FREE ENERGY; GROUND STATE; HAMILTONIANS; MAGNETIC FIELDS; MAGNETIZATION; SPECIFIC HEAT; SUPERCONDUCTIVITY;

MAGNETIC ENTROPY; QUANTUM CRITICAL POINTS; QUANTUM TRANSFER MATRIX METHOD; STRONG COUPLING LADDER COMPOUNDS; THERMODYNAMIC BETHE ANSATZ;

MAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY;

EID: 0347051497     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: 10797114     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.217202     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. For reviews, see E. Dagotto and T.M. Rice, Science 271, 618 (1996);
2. E. Dagotto, Rep. Prog. Phys. 62, 1525 (1999).10.1088/0034-4885/62/11/202
3. M. Reigrotzki, H. Tsunetsugu, and T.M. Rice, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 6, 9235 (1994).
4. Y. Wang, Phys. Rev. B 60, 9236 (1999).10.1103/PhysRevB.60.9236
5. M.T. Batchelor and M. Maslen, J. Phys. AJPHAC5 32, L377 (1999);
6. M.T. Batchelor, J. de Gier, and M. Maslen, J. Stat. Phys. 102, 559 (2001).
7. M.T. Batchelor, X.-W. Guan, A. Foerster, and H.-Q. Zhou, New J. Phys. 5, 107 (2003).
8. M. Shiroishi and M. Takahashi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 117201 (2002).10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.117201
9. Z. Tsuboi, J. Phys. AJPHAC5 36, 1493 (2003).
10. A. Kuniba, T. Nakanishi, and J. Suzuki, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 9, 5215 (1994).
11. M. Suzuki, Phys. Rev. B 31, 2957 (1985); 10.1103/PhysRevB.31.2957
12. A. Klümper, Ann. Phys. (Leipzig)ANPYA2 1, 540 (1992);
13. G. Jüttner, A. Klümper, and J. Suzuki, Nucl. Phys. B487, 650 (1997).
14. A different QTM method has been applied numerically to the standard Heisenberg ladder in M. Troyer, H. Tsunetsugu, and D. Würtz, Phys. Rev. B 50, 13?515 (1994).10.1103/PhysRevB.50.13515
15. G. Chaboussant et al, Phys. Rev. B 55, 3046 (1997); 10.1103/PhysRevB.55.3046
16. G. Chaboussant
17. G. Chaboussant
18. M. Hagiwara, H.A. Katori, U. Schollwöck, and H.-J. Mikeska, Phys. Rev. B 62, 1051 (2000).10.1103/PhysRevB.62.1051
19. C.P. Landee, M.M. Turnbull, C. Galeriu, J. Giantsidis, and F.M. Woodward, Phys. Rev. B 63, 100402 (2001).10.1103/PhysRevB.63.100402
20. The multibody term arises naturally in other contexts, see, e.g., A.A. Nersesyan and A.M. Tsvelik, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3939 (1997); 10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.3939
21. A.K. Kolezhuk and H.-J. Mikeska, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2709 (1998).
22. G. Chaboussant et al, Eur. Phys. J. B 6, 167 (1998).10.1007/s100510050539
23. K. Katoh, Y. Hosokoshi, K. Inoue, and T. Goto, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 69, 1008 (2000).
24. Z. Honda, Y. Nonomura, and K. Katsumata, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 66, 3689 (1997).
25. S.-J. Gu, Y.-Q. Li, and H.-Q. Zhou, cond-mat/0308432.
26. Z.-J. Ying, A. Foerster, X.-W. Guan, B. Chen, and I. Roditi, cond-mat/0308443.