Argument linking and the commercial transaction frame in English, Russian and Japanese

Language Sciences

Volumn 23, Issue 4-5, 2001, Pages 579-602

  Croft, William ^a   Taoka, Chiaki ^a   Wood, Esther J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Argument structure; English; Japanese; Lexical semantics (verbal semantics) (semantics); Russian; Syntax

Indexed keywords

EID: 0347032810     PISSN: 03880001     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0388-0001(00)00037-1     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Croft, W., 1990. Possible verbs and event structure. In: Tsohatzidis, S.L. (Ed.), Meanings and Prototypes: Studies on Linguistic Categorization. Routledge, London, pp. 48-73.
2. Croft, W., 1991. Syntactic Categories and Grammatical Relations: The Cognitive Organization of Information. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
3. Croft, W., 1993. Case marking and the semantics of mental verbs. In: Pustejovsky, J. (Ed.), Semantics and the Lexicon. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp. 55-72.
4. Croft, W., 1994. Voice:beyond control and affectedness.. In: Hopper, P., Fox, B (Eds.), Voice:Form and Function. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 89-117.
5. Croft, W., 1998. Event structure in argument linking. In: Butt, M., Geuder, W. (Eds.), The Projection of Arguments:Lexical and Compositional Factors. Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford, pp. 1-43.
6. Croft, W., Wood, E.J., 2000. Construal operations in linguistics and artificial intelligence. In: Albertazzi, L. (Ed.), Meaning and Cognition. John Benjamins. Amsterdam.
7. Fillmore, C.J., 1982. Frame semantics. In: The Linguistic Society of Korea. Linguistics in the Morning Calm. Hanshin, Seoul, pp. 111-137.
8. Fillmore, C.J., 1985. Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni di Semantica 6, 222-254.
9. Goldberg, A.E., 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
10. Green, G., 1974. Semantics and Syntactic Regularity. Indiana University Press, Bloomington.
11. Haiman, J., 1983. Iconic and economic motivation. Language 59, 781-819.
12. Jackendoff, R., 1990. Semantic Structures. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
13. Langacker, R.W., 1976. Semantic representations and the linguistic relativity hypothesis. Foundations of Language 14, 307-357.
14. Langacker, R.W., 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol I: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford University Press, Stanford.
15. Martin, S.E., 1975. A Reference Grammar of Japanese. Yale University Press, New Haven and London.
16. Oehrle, R. 1975. The Grammatical Status of the English Dative Alternation. PhD dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
17. Pulkina, I., Zaxava-Nekrasova, E. (n.d.) Russian. Progress, Moscow.
18. Talmy, L., 1976. Semantic causative types. In: Shibatani, Masayoshi. (Ed.), The Grammar of Causative Constructions. Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 6.1. Academic Press, New York, pp. 43-116.
19. Talmy, L., 1988. Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science 12, 49-100.