Reliabilty and validity of the Kansas marital satisfaction scale for Chinese parents

Psychological Reports

Volumn 83, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 81-82

  Shek, Daniel T L ^a  

^a CHINESE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0347032655     PISSN: 00332941     EISSN: 1558691X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2466/pr0.1998.83.1.81     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. GREEN, R. G., WOODY, D., MAXWELL, S., MERCER, R., & WILLIAMS, S. (1998) Reliability and validity of the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale in a sample of African-American husbands and wives. Psychological Reports, 82, 255-258.
2. SCHUMM, W. R., PAFF-BERGEN, L. A., HATCH, R. C., OBIORAH, F. C., COPELAND, J. M., MEENS, L. D., & BUGAIGHIS, M. A. (1986) Concurrent and discriminant validity of the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48, 381-387.
3. SHEK, D. T. L. (1995) The Chinese version of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale: does language make a difference? Journal of Clinical Psychology, 51, 802-811.
4. SHEK, D. T. L. (1998) A longitudinal study of the relations between parent-adolescent conflict and adolescent psychological well-being. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 159, 53-67.
5. SHEK, D. T. L., LAM, M. C., TSOI, K. W., & LAM, C. M. (1993) Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale. Social Behavior and Personality, 21, 241-250.
6. SPANIER, G. B. (1976) Measuring dyadic adjustment: new scales for assessing the quality of marriage and other dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 15-28.
7. STEIGER, J. H. (1980) Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 245-251.