Why significant UML change is unlikely

Communications of the ACM

Volumn 45, Issue 11, 2002, Pages 82-85

  Dori, Dov ^a,b  

^a TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Israel)

^b MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0347017227     PISSN: 00010782     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/581571.581599     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Dori, D. Object-Process Methodology: A Holistic Systems Paradigm. Springer Verlag, Berlin, 2002.
2. Dori, D., Reinhartz-Berger, I., and Sturm, A. OPCAT Object-Process CASE Tool, Version 2.02, 2002; see iew3.technion.ac.il/∼dori/opcat/ index-continue.html.
3. Heylighen, F. Principia Cybernetica Web. Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium, 2001; see pespmc1.vub.ac.be/HEYL.html.
4. Object Management Group. Sight Code Initial Submission Against the UML 2.0 Infrastructure RFP, OMG Document ad/01-08-23, 2001; see www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?ad/2001-08-23.
5. Peleg, M. and Dori, D. The model multiplicity problem: Experimenting with real-time specification methods. IEEE Transact. Soft. Engin. 26, 8 (2000), 742-759.
6. Siau, K. and Cau, C. Unified Modeling Language: A complexity analysis. J. Database Mgmt. 12, 1 (Jan.-Mar. 2001), 26-34.
7. Simons, T. Dependencies and associations. Precise UML Group Email Forum (June 21, 2001); see www.cs.york.ac.uk/puml/puml-list-archive/0310.html.
8. Soffer, P., Golany, B., Dori, D., and Wand, Y. Modeling off-the-shelf information systems requirements: An ontological approach. Requir. Engin. 6, 3 (2001), 183-199.
9. U2 Partners. UML2 Draft Version 0.671 (Jan. 30, 2002); see www.u2-partners.org/.