Item response theory and confirmatory factor analysis: Two approaches for testing the psychometric equivalence of translated tests;Teoría de respuesta al ítem y análisis factorial confirmatorio: Dos métodos para analizar la equivalencia psicométrica en la traducción de cuestionarios

Psicothema

Volumn 12, Issue SUPPL. 2, 2000, Pages 540-544

  Tomás Marco, Inés ^a   González Romá, Vicente ^a   Gómez Benito, Juana ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0347013972     PISSN: 02149915     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Brislin, R.W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written material. En H. C. Triandis y J.W. Berry (eds.), Handbook of Cross-Cultural Psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 389-444). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
2. Everson, H.T., Millsap, R.E., & Rodriguez, C.M. (1991). Isolating gender differences in test anxiety: A confirmatory factor analysis of the test anxiety inventory. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51, 243-251.
3. Ferrando, P.J. (1996). Calibration of invariant item parameters in a continuous item response model using the extended Lisrel measurement submodel. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 31 (4), 419-439.
4. Hambleton, R.K. (1994). Guidelines for adapting educational and psychological tests: A progress report. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 10, 229-240.
5. Hambleton, R.K. (1996). Adaptación de tests para su uso en diferentes idiomas y culturas: fuentes de error, posibles soluciones y directrices prácticas. En J. Muñiz (coor.), Psicometría (pp. 208-238). Madrid: Universitas.
6. Hambleton, R.K. & Kanjee, A. (1995). Increasing the validity of cross-cultural assessments: Use of improved methods for test adaptations. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 11 (3), 147-157.
7. Jöreskog, K.G. & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL VIII: User's reference guide. Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software.
8. Marsh, H.W., Richards, G.E., Johnson, S., Roche, L., & Tremayne, P. (1994). Physical Self-Description Questionnaire: Psychometric properties and a multitrait-multimethod analysis of relations to existing instruments. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 16, 270-305.
9. Maurer, T.J., Raju, N.S., & Collins, W.C. (1998). Peer and subordinate performance appraisal measurement equivalence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83 (5), 693-702.
10. Mellenberg, G.J. (1994). A unidimensional latent trait model for continuous item responses. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 29 (3), 223-236.
11. Millsap, R.E. & Everson, H.T. (1991). Confirmatory measurement model comparisons using latent means. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 26, 479-497.
12. Millsap, R.E. & Everson, H.T. (1993). Methodology review: Statistical approaches for assessing measurement bias. Applied Psychological Measurement, 17 (4), 297-334.
13. Reise, S.P., Widaman, K.F., & Pugh, R.H. (1993). Confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: Two approaches for exploring measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 114 (3), 552-566.
14. Samejima, E (1969). Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika Monographs, 34 (Suppl. 17).
15. SPSS Inc. (1993). SPSS for Windows. Base System User's Guide (6.0).
16. Thissen, D. (1988). MULTILOG: Multiple, categorical item analysis and test scoring using item response theory (Version 5.1). Chicago: Scientific Software.
17. Thissen, D., Steinberg, L., Pyszczynski, T., & Greenberg J. (1983). An item response theory for personality and attitude scales: Item analysis using restricted factor analysis. Applied Psychological Measurement, 7, 211-226.
18. Tomas, I. (1998). Equivalencia psicométrica de una traducción del cuestionario de autoconcepto físico PSDQ (Physical Self-Description Questionnaire) al castellano. Tesis doctoral no publicada. Valencia: Universitat de València.
19. Van de Vijver, F. & Hambleton, R.K. (1996). Translating tests: Some practical guidelines. European Psychologist, 1 (2), 89-99.