Determination of field capacity in situ or by regression equations;Determinação de capacidade de campo in situ ou através de equações de regressão

Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira

Volumn 35, Issue 5, 2000, Pages 1029-1036

  Fabian, Adelar José ^a   Ottoni Filho, Theophilo Benedicto ^b  

^a Esc Agrotecnica Fed de Cuiaba   (Brazil)

^b FEDERAL RURAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Drainage equipment; Internal drainage; Pedofunctions measurement; Soil moisture; Soil water retention

Indexed keywords

FABIA;

EID: 0347013769     PISSN: 0100204X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-204x2000000500022     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. AHUJA, L.R.; NAMEY, J.W.; WILLIAMS, R.D. Estimating soil water characteristics from simpler properties or limited data. Soil Science Society of America. Journal, Madison, v.49, p.1100-1105, 1985.
2. ARRUDA, F.B.; ZULLO JÚNIOR, J.; OLIVEIRA, J.B. Parâmetros de solo para o cálculo da água disponível com base na textura do solo. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo, Campinas, v.11, p.11-15, 1987.
3. BASTED, G.; BRUAND, A.; VOLTZ, M.; BORNAND, M.; QUETIN, P. Prediction of water retention properties: performance of available pedotransfer functions and development of new approaches. In: CONGRES MONDIAL DE SCIENCE DU SOL, 16., 1998, Montpellier. Résumés. Montpellier : ISSS-AISS-IBG-SICS/AFES, 1998. v.1. p.22. Trabalho apresentado na Integra na forma de pôster.
4. BOÉDT, L.; VERHEYE, W. Evaluation of profile available water capacity. 1. The conceptual approach. Pedologie, Ghent, v.35, p.55-65, 1985.
5. EMBRAPA. Serviço Nacional de Levantamento e Conservação de Solos (Rio de Janeiro, RJ). Manual de métodos de análise de solo. Rio de Janeiro, 1979. Não paginado.
6. FABIAN, A.J.; OTTONI FILHO, T.B. Determinação de curvas de infiltração usando uma câmara de fluxo. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo, Campinas, v.21, p.325-333, 1997.
7. GUPTA, S.C.; LARSON, W.E. Estimating soil water retention characteristics from particle size distribution, organic matter content, and bulk density. Water Resources Research, Washington, v.20, p.1633-1635, 1979.
8. HILLEL, D. Internal drainage and redistribution following infiltration. In: HILLEL, D. (Ed.). Applications of soil physics. New York: Academic, 1980. p.50-72.
9. HOLLIS, J.M.; JONES, R.J.A.; PALMER, R.C. The effects of organic mater and particle size on the water retention properties of some soils in the west midlands of England. Geoderma, Amsterdam, v.17, p.225-238, 1977.
10. KIEHL, E.J. Manual de edafologia. São Paulo : Agronômica Ceres, 1979. Cap.13, 264p.
11. MACEDO, J.R. Determinação de retenção hídrica por correlação múltipla e de variabilidade espacial em solos podzólicos de Seropédica, RJ. Rio de Janeiro : UFRRJ, 1991. 174p. Dissertação de Mestrado.
12. OLIVEIRA, L.B.; MELO, V. Estudo da disponibilidade de água em um solo da estação experimental de Itapirema, Pernambuco. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, Série Agronomia, Rio de Janeiro, v.6, p.31-37, 1971.
13. OLIVEIRA, L.B.; QUEIROZ, E.N. Curvas características de retenção de umidade de solos do Nordeste do Brasil. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, Série Agronomia, Rio de Janeiro, v.10, p.69-75, 1975.
14. PAIGE, G.B.; HILLEL, D. Comparison of three methods for assessing soil hydraulic properties. Soil Science, Baltimore, v.155, p.175-189, 1993.
15. PETERSEN, G. W.; CUNNINGHAM, R.L.; MATELSKI, R.P. Moisture characteristics of Pennsylvania soils. I. Moisture retention as related to texture. Soil Science Society of America. Proceedings, Madison, v.32, p.271-275, 1968.
16. PIMENTEL-GOMES, F. Curso de estatística experimental. 4.ed. Piracicaba : Nobel, 1993. 430p.
17. POULOVASSILIS, A. The influence of the initial water content on the redistribution of soil water after infiltration. Soil Science, Baltimore, v.135, p.275-281,1983.
18. RAWLS, W.J.; BRAKENSIEK, D.L.; SAXTON, K.E. Estimation of soil water properties. Transactions of the ASAE, Saint Joseph, v.25, p.1316-1320, 1982.
19. REICHARDT, K. Capacidade de campo. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo, Campinas, v.12, p.211-216, 1988.
20. RIVERS, E.D.; SHIPP, R.F. Soil water retention as related to particle size in selected sands and loamy sands. Soil Science, Baltimore, v.126, p.94-100, 1978.
21. SALTER, P.J.; WILLIAMS, J.B. The influence of texture on the moisture characteristics of soils. I. A critical comparison of techniques for determining the available water capacity and moisture characteristic curve of a soil. Journal of Soil Science, Oxford,v.16, p.1-15, 1965.
22. SAXTON, K.E.; RAWLS, W.J.; ROMBERGER, J.S.; PADENDICK, R.I. Estimating generalized soil-water characteristics from texture. Soil Science Society of America. Journal, Madison, v.50, p.1031-1036, 1986.
23. SCHUB, W.M.; CLINE, R.L.; SWEENEY, M.D. Comparison of a laboratory procedure and a textural model for predicting in situ soil water retention. Soil Science Society of America. Journal, Madison, v.52, p.1218-1227, 1988.
24. SWAIN, D.J.; SCOTTER, D.R. Hydraulic properties and field capacity of Himatangi sand. New Zealand Journal of Experimental Agriculture, Lower Hutt, v.16, p.367-374, 1988.
25. VEIHMEYER, F.J.; HENDRICKSON, A.H. The moisture equivalent as a measure of the field capacity of soil. Soil Science, Baltimore, v.32, p.181-193, 1931.
26. WARRICK, A.W.; NIELSEN, D.R. Spatial variability of soil physical properties in the field. In: HILLEL, D. (Ed.). Applications of soil physics. New York : Academic, 1980. p.319-344.
27. WILLIAMS, R.D.; AHUJA, L.R.; NAMEY, J.W. Comparison of methods to estimate soil water characteristics from soil texture, bulk density, and limited data. Soil Science, Baltimore, v.153, p.172-184, 1992.