|
Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 519-524
|
Comparison of hexamethylhypericin and tetrabromohypericin to hypericin for their in vivo efficacy as PDT tools.
a a a a a a a |
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT;
DRUG DERIVATIVE;
HYPERICIN;
PERYLENE;
PHOTOSENSITIZING AGENT;
PLASMA PROTEIN;
PROTEIN KINASE C;
ANIMAL;
ARTICLE;
CELL CULTURE;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
DBA MOUSE;
DRUG ANTAGONISM;
EXPERIMENTAL NEOPLASM;
FEMALE;
HUMAN;
LYMPHOMA;
METABOLISM;
MOUSE;
PATHOLOGY;
PHOTOCHEMOTHERAPY;
SURVIVAL RATE;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
ANIMALS;
ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENTS;
BLOOD PROTEINS;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
LYMPHOMA;
MICE;
MICE, INBRED DBA;
NEOPLASMS, EXPERIMENTAL;
PERYLENE;
PHOTOCHEMOTHERAPY;
PHOTOSENSITIZING AGENTS;
PROTEIN KINASE C;
SURVIVAL RATE;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
TUMOR CELLS, CULTURED;
MLCS;
MLOWN;
|
EID: 0346999212
PISSN: 10196439
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.3892/ijo.23.2.519 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (11)
|
References (0)
|