On permeability of methyl methacrylate, 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate and triethyleneglycol dimethacrylate through protective gloves in dentistry

European Journal of Oral Sciences

Volumn 111, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 529-535

  Andreasson, Harriet ^a   Boman, Anders ^b   Johnsson, Stina ^b   Karlsson, Stig ^a   Barregård, Lars ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^b KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^c SAHLGRENSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Gloves; In vitro test; Methacrylates; Permeability

Indexed keywords

2 HYDROXYETHYL METHACRYLATE; ACETONE; ALCOHOL; COPOLYMER; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; METHACRYLIC ACID METHYL ESTER; NEOPRENE; POLYETHYLENE; RUBBER;

ALLERGY; ARTICLE; CONTACT ALLERGY; DECISION MAKING; DENTISTRY; GLOVE; MANUAL LABOR; PERMEABILITY; TIME;

ACETONE; DENTAL MATERIALS; ETHANOL; GLOVES, PROTECTIVE; GLOVES, SURGICAL; LATEX; METHACRYLATES; METHYLMETHACRYLATE; NEOPRENE; PERMEABILITY; POLYETHYLENE; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACIDS; POLYVINYL CHLORIDE; SOLVENTS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0346993406     PISSN: 09098836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0909-8836.2003.00070.x     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. HENSTEN-PETERSEN A, JACOBSEN N. The role of biomaterials as occupational hazards in dentistry. Int Dent J 1990; 40: 59-166.
2. WRANGSJÖ K, WALLENHAMMAR L-M, ÖRTENGREN U, BARREGÅRD L, ANDREASSON H, BJÖRKNER B, KARLSSON S, MEDING B. Protective gloves in Swedish dentistry: use and side-effects. Br J Dermatol 2001; 45: 32-37.
3. MELLSTRÖM GA, JOHANSSON S, NYHAMMAR E. Barrier effect of gloves against cytostatic drugs. Curr Probl Dermatol 1996; 25: 63-169.
4. KANERVA L, ESTLANDER T, JOLANKI R. Occupational skin allergy in the dental profession. Dermatol Clin 1994; 12: 517-532.
5. KANERVA L, JOLANKI R, LEINO T, ESTLANDER T. Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from 2-hydroyethyl methacrylate and ethylene glycol dimethacrylate in a modified acrylic structural adhesive. Contact Dermatitis 1995; 33: 84-89.
6. WALLENHAMMAR L-M, ÖRTENGREN U, ANDREASSON H, BARREGÅRD L, BJÖRKNER B, KARLSSON S, WRANGSJÖ K, MEDING B. Contact allergy and hand eczema in Swedish dentists. Contact Dermatitis 2000; 43: 192-199.
7. JACOBSEN N, HENSTEN-PETERSEN A. Self-reported occupation-related health complaints among dental laboratory technicians. Quintessence Int 1993; 24: 409-415.
8. MÜRER AJL, POULSEN OM, ROED-PETERSEN J, TÜCHSEN F. Skin problems among Danish dental technicians. Contact Dermatitis 1995; 33: 42-47.
9. MÜRER AJL, PAULSEN OM, TUCHSEN F, ROED-PETERSEN J. Rapid increase in skin problems among dental technician trainees working with acrylates. Contact Dermatitis 1995; 33: 106-111.
10. WAEGEMAEKERS THJM, SEUTTER E, DEN AREND JACJ MALTEN KE. Permeability of surgeons gloves to methyl methacrylate. Acta Orthop Scand 1983; 54: 790-795.
11. DARRE E, VEDEL P, JENSEN JS. Skin protection against methylmethacrylate. Acta Orthop Scand 1987; 58: 236-238.
12. MUNKSGAARD EC. Permeability of protective gloves to (di) methacrylates in resinous dental materials. Scand J Dent Res 1992; 100: 189-192.
13. MÄKELÄ EA, VÄÄNÄNEN V, ALANKO K, JOLANKI R, ESTLANDER T, KANERVA L. Resistance of disposable gloves to permeation by. 2-hydroxyethylmethacrylate and triethylene glycoldimethacrylate. Occup Hyg 1999; 582: 121-129.
14. MUNKSGAARD EC. Permeability of protective gloves by HEMA and TEGDMA in the presence of solvents. Acta Odontol Scand 2000; 58: 57-62.
15. BAUMANN MA, RATH B, FISCHER JH, IFFLAND R. The permeability of dental procedure and examination gloves by an alcohol based disinfectant. Dent Mater 2000; 6: 139-144.
16. TINSLEY D, CHADWICK RG. The permeability of dental gloves following exposure to certain dental materials. J Dent 1997; 25: 65-70.
17. MELLSTRÖM GA. Comparison of chemical permeation data obtained with ASTM and ISO permeation test cells-1. The ASTM standard test procedure. Ann Occup Hyg 1991; 35: 153-166.
18. GUMMER CL, MAIBACH HI. Diffusion cell design. In: BRONAUGH, RL, MAIBACH, HI, eds. In vitro percutaneous absorption, principles, fundamentals, and applications. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 1991; 7-16.
19. FORSBERG K, KEITH L. Chemical protective clothing performance index, 2nd edn. New York: Wiley-Interscience, 1999.
20. DEVLIN H, PIDDOCK V. The effect of methyl methacrylate monomer in latex gloves. Clin Mater 1994; 16: 111-118.
21. MICKELSEN RL, HALL RC. A breakthrough time comparison of nitrile and neoprene glove materials produced by different glove manufactures. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1987; 48: 941-947.
22. ANDERSSON T, BRUZE M. In vivo testing of the protective efficacy of gloves against allergen-containing products using an open chamber system. Contact Dermatitis 1999; 41: 260-263.
23. LIDÉN C. Occupational dermatoses at a film laboratory. Contact Dermatitis 1984; 10: 77-87.
24. LAUWERY RR, KIVITS A, LHOIR M, RIGOLET P, HOUBEAU D, BUCHET JP, ROELS HA. Biological surveillance of workers exposed to dimethyl formamide and the influence of skin protection on its percutaneous absorption. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 1980; 45: 189-203.
25. BROOKS SM, ANDERSSON L, EMMET E, CARSON A, TSAY JY, ELIA W, BUNCHER R, KARBOWSKY R. The effect of protective equipment on styrene exposure in workers in the reinforced plastics industry. Arch Environ Health 1980; 35: 287-294.
26. ANDERSSON T, BRUZE M, BJÖRKNER B. In vivo testing of the protection of gloves against acrylates in dentin-bonding systems on patients with known contact allergy to acrylates. Contact Dermatitis 1999; 41: 254-259.
27. ANDERSSON T, BRUZE M, GRUVBERGER B, BJÖRKNER B. In vivo testing of the protection provided by non-latex gloves against a 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate containing acetone-based dentin-bonding product. Acta Derm Venerol 2000; 80: 435-437.