The building of knowledge spaces in Mexico: A regional approach to networking

Research Policy

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 225-241

  Casas, Rosalba ^a   De Gortari, Rebeca ^a   Santos, Ma Josefa ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Biotechnology; Knowledge networks; Material sciences; Regional approach; Telecommunications

Indexed keywords

EID: 0346986303     PISSN: 00487333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00062-1     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Abdel Musik, G., 1998. Regional and local systems of innovation in Aguascalientes. In: Cimoli, M. (Ed.), The Mexican Innovation System. Recent Development and Main Characteristics. Work in progress, Project CONACYT-OECD, Mexico.
2. Biggiero L. Italian industrial districts: a Triple Helix pattern of problem solving. Industry and Higher Education. 12:1998;227-234.
3. Capdevielle, M., Dutrenit, G., 1995. Competitividad, dinamismo y patrón tecnológico de las exportaciones manufactureras mexicanas en los ochenta. In: Soto, E., et al. (Eds.), Globalización, Economía y Proyecto Neoliberal en México. UAM-GRESAL, México.
4. Casas, R., de Gortari, R., Luna, M., 1997. University Science Base and Collaborative Patterns with Industry. Executive Summary, Mexican Innovation System Project, CONACYT-OCDE, México, May.
5. CINVESTAV, 1996. Anuario 1995. Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados, IPN, México.
6. Corona, L. (Ed.), 1997. Cien Empresas Innovadoras en México. UNAM/Porrúa Editors, México.
7. de Breson C., Amesse F. Networks of innovators: a review and introduction to the issue. Research Policy. 20:1991;363-379.
8. Drejer, I. et al., 1997. Studies of clusters as a basis for industrial and technology policy in the Danish economy. In: OECD Workshop on Cluster Analysis and Cluster Based Policies, Amsterdam.
9. Edquist, Ch. (Ed.), 1997. Systems of Innovation. Technologies, Institutions and Organisations. Pinter, London.
10. Edquist, Ch., Lundvall, B., 1993. Comparing the Danish and Swedish systems of innovation. In: Nelson, R. (Ed.), National Innovation Systems. A Comparative Analysis. Oxford Univ. Press, New York, pp. 265-298.
11. Elías Calles, E., 1998. Personal interview. Fundación Guanajuato Produce, Celaya, Guanajuato, 26 November.
12. Etzkowitz, H., 1996. Knowledge based economic and social development: the Triple Helix of regional co-operation among universities, industry and government. Manuscript.
13. Etzkowitz H., Leydesdorff L. The Triple Helix: university-industry-government relations. A laboratory of knowledge based economic development. EASST Review. 14(1):1995;11-19.
14. Etzkowitz H., Leydesdorff L. Introduction to the special issue on science policy dimensions of the Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Science and Public Policy. 24(1):1997;2-5.
15. Freeman C. Networks of innovators: a synthesis of research issues. Research Policy. 20:1991;499-514.
16. Gibbons, M., Limoge, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., Trow, M., 1994. The New Production of Knowledge. The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. Sage Publications, London.
17. Imai, K., Baba, Y., 1989. Systemic innovation and cross-border networks: transcending markets and hierarchies to create a new techno-economic system. OECD, Conference on Science, Technology and Economic Growth, Paris, June.
18. Joffre, A., 1998. Personal interview. Cinvestav-Irapuato, July, Irapuato, Guanajuato.
19. Johnson B., Lundvall B. Sistemas Nacionales de Innovación y Aprendizaje Institucional. Comercio Exterior. 44(8):1994;695-704.
20. Leydesdorff, L., 2000. The Triple Helix as an Evolutionary Model of Innovations, Research Policy, 243-255.
21. López, M., 1998. Personal interview. Cinvestav-Irapuato, July, Irapuato, Guanajuato.
22. Mansfield E. Academic research and industrial innovation. Research Policy. 20:1991;1-12.
23. Nelson, R., 1993. Institutions supporting technical change in the United States. In: Nelson, R. (Ed.), National Innovation Systems. A Comparative Analysis. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
24. OECD, 1996. National Innovation Systems: report on Pilot Case Studies. Working Group on Innovation and Technology Policy, 24-25 June.
25. PCITEG, 1998. Plan de Ciencia y Tecnología del Estado de Guanajuato: 1998 to 2020. CONCYTEG/Gobierno del Estado, Guanajuato.
26. Rivera, R., 1998. Personal interview. Cinvestav-Irapuato, July, Irapuato, Guanajuato.
27. Rosenberg N., Nelson R.R. American universities and technical advance in industry. Research Policy. 23:1994;323-348.
28. Senker J., Faulkner W. Industrial use of public sector research in advanced technologies: a comparison of biotechnology and ceramics. R&D Management. 22(2):1992;157-175.
29. Tapia, A., 1998. Flujos para la inovación tecnológica en la micro y pequeña empresa de Querétaro. In: Sánches Daza, G., et al., (Eds.), La Investigación y Vinculación Tecnológica: Un Enfoque Regional. BUAP/UAS, Mexico.
30. Villagómez Cabrera, J., 1996. Análisis del potencial regional del Bajío Mexicano en su desarrollo tecnológico e industrial. Memorias del VIII Simposio Anual 'Cultura, Tecnología e inovacion en las Empresas Mexicanas' de la ADIAT, Asociación Mexicana de Directivos de la Investigación Aplicada y el Desarrollo Tecnológico, A.C., 7-8 November. World Trade Centre, Mexico City.
31. Vithlani, H., 1996. An Empirical Study of the UK Innovation System. Department of Trade and Industry, London.