Shape and depth solutions from moving average residual self-potential anomalies

Kuwait Journal of Science and Engineering

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 319-334

  Abdelrahman, El Sayed M ^a   El Araby, Tarek M ^a   El Araby, Hesham M ^a   Ammar, Ahmed A ^b   Hassanein, Hamdi I ^b  

^a CAIRO UNIVERSITY   (Egypt)

^b NUCLEAR MATERIALS AUTHORITY   (Egypt)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0346977864     PISSN: 10248684     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Abdelrahman, E.M. & Sharafeldein, S.M. 1997. A least squares approach to depth determination from self-potential anomalies caused by horizontal cylinders and spheres. Geophysics 62: 44-48.
2. Agocs, W. 1951. Least squares residual anomaly determination. Geophysics 16: 686-696.
3. Atchuta Rao, D. & Ram Babu, H.V. 1983. Quantitative interpretation of self-potential anomalies due two-dimensional sheet-like bodies. Geophysics 48: 1659-1664.
4. Banerjee, B. 1971. Quantitative interpretation of self-potential anomalies of some specific geometric bodies. Pure and Applied Geophysics 90: 138-152.
5. Battacharya B.B. & Roy, N. 1981. A note on the use of nomogram for self-potential anomalies. Geophysical Prospecting 29: 102-107.
6. Demidovich, B.P. & Maron, I.A. 1973. Computational Mathematics. Mir, Moscow.
7. DeWitte, L. 1948. A new method of interpretation of self-potential field data. Geophysics 13: 600-608.
8. Griffin, W.R. 1949. Residual gravity in theory and practice. Geophysics 14: 39-58.
9. Fitterman, D.V. 1979. Calculations of self-potential anomalies near vertical contacts. Geophysics 44: 195-205.
10. Heiland, C.A.A. 1940. Geophysical exploration. Hafner Publishing Co., New York, NY, USA.
11. Meiser, P. 1962. A method of quantitative interpretation self-potential measurements. Geophysical Prospecting 10: 203-218.
12. Patella, D. 1997a. Introduction to ground surface self-potential tomography. Geophysical Prospecting 45: 653-681.
13. Patella, D. 1997b. Self-potential global tomography including topographic effects. Geophysical Prospecting 45: 843-863.
14. Paul, M.K. 1965. Direct interpretation of self-potential anomalies caused by inclined sheets of infinite horizontal extensions. Geophysics 30: 418-423.
15. Paul, M.K., Datta, S. & Banerjee, B. 1965. Interpretation of self-potential anomalies due to localized causative bodies. Pure and Applied Geophysics 61: 95-100.
16. Petrovsky, A. 1928. Problem of hidden polarization sphere. Philosophical Magazine 5: 334-353, 914-933.
17. Ram Babu, H.V. & Atchuta Rao, D. 1988. A rapid graphical method for the interpretation of the self-potential anomaly over a two-dimensional inclined sheet of finite depth extent (short note). Geophysics 53: 1126-1128.
18. Roy A. & Chowdhury, D.K. 1959. Interpretation of self-potential data for tabular bodies. Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research 3: 35-54.
19. Satyanarayana Murty, B.V. & Haricharan, P. 1985. Nomogram for the complete interpretation of spontaneous potential profile over sheet-like and cylindrical two-dimensional sources. Geophysics 50: 1127-1135.
20. Stanley, J.M. 1977. Simplified magnetic interpretation of the geologic contact and thin dike. Geophysics 42: 1236-1240.
21. Yungul, S. 1950. Interpretation of spontaneous polarization anomalies caused by spheroidal ore bodies. Geophysics 15: 237-246.