Drawing comparative lessons from France and Germany

Review of Policy Research

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 493-524

  Mazur, Amy G ^a  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMINISM; GENDER ROLE; SOCIAL JUSTICE; WOMENS EMPLOYMENT;

CENTRAL EUROPE; EURASIA; EUROPE; FRANCE; GERMANY; WESTERN EUROPE;

EID: 0346957332     PISSN: 02784416     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1541-1338.00033     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Abrar, S., Lovenduski, J., & Margetts, H. (2000). Feminist ideas and domestic violence policy change. Political Studies, 48, 239-262.
2. Anderson, J. E. (1994). Public policymaking: An introduction. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
3. Atkinson, M. M., & Cole, W. D. (1992). Strong states and weak states: Sectoral policy networks in advanced capitalist economies. British Journal of Political Science, 19, 47-67.
4. Baumgartner, F. R. (1996). The many styles of policymaking in France. In J. Keller & M. Schain (Eds.). Chirac's challenge: Liberalization, Europeanization, and malaise in France. New York: St. Martin's.
5. Bergvist, C., Borchorst, A., Christensen, A.-D., Ramstedt-Silén, V., Raaum, N. C., & Styrkasdottir, A. (Eds.). (1999). Equal democracies? Gender politics in the Nordic countries. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.
6. Collier, D. (1993). The comparative method. In A. Finifter (Ed.). Political science: The state of the discipline II (pp. 105-119). Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.
7. Cowles Green, M., Caporaso, J., & Risse, T. (Eds.). (2001). Transforming Europe: Europeanization and domestic change. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
8. Daley, M. (2000). A fine balance: Women's labor market participation in international comparison. In F. W. Scharpf & V. A. Schmidt (Eds.). Welfare and work in the open economy: Diverse responses to common challenges (pp. 467-510). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9. Duchen, C. (1987). Feminism in France from May 1968 to Mitterrand. London: Routledge.
10. Duchen, C. (2000). Feminism and the parity debate in France. In A. Bull, H. Diamond, & R. Marsh (Eds.). Feminisms and Women's Movements in Contemporary Europe (pp. 194-210). New York: St. Martins.
11. Elman, R. A. (1996). Sexual subordination and state intervention: Comparing Sweden and the United States. Providence/Oxford: Berghahn.
12. Esping-Andersen, G. (1999). Social foundations of post industrial economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13. EUROSTAT. (2002, October). The life of women and men in Europe: A statistical portrait of women and men in all stages of life. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publication of the European Communities.
14. Fagan, C., & O'Reilly, J. (1998). Conceptualising part-time work: The value of an integrated comparative perspective. In J. O'Reilly & C. Fagan (Eds.). Part-time prospects: International comparisons of part-time work in Europe, North America and the Pacific Rim (pp. 1-31). London: Routledge.
15. Fagnani, J. (1996). Family policies and working mothers: A comparison of France and West Germany. In M. Dolors García-Ramon & J. Monk (Eds.). Women of the European Union: The politics of work and daily life (pp. 126-137). London: Routledge.
16. Feick, J. (1992). Comparing comparative policy studies: A path toward integration? Journal of Public Policy, 12, 257-285.
17. Ferree, M. Marx. (1987). Equality and autonomy: Feminist politics in the United States and West Germany. In M. F. Katzenstein & C. Mueller (Eds). The women's movements of the United States and Western Europe (pp. 172-195). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
18. Ferree, M. Marx. (1995). Making equality: The women's affairs offices in the Federal Republic of Germany. In D. McBride Stetson & A. G. Mazur (Eds.). Comparative state feminism (pp. 95-113). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19. Ferree, M. Marx. (1997). Patriarchies and feminisms: The two women's movements of post-unification Germany. In B. Hobson & A. M. Berggren (Eds.). Crossing borders: Gender and citizenship in transition. Stockholm: Swedish Council for Planning and Coordination of Research.
20. Freeman, G. P. (1985). National styles and policy sectors: Explaining structured variation. Journal of Public Policy, 15, 467-496.
21. Gaspard, F. (1993). Homme et Femmes en Chiffres dans La Vie Publique: Constat de la Disparité, Eléments d'analyse. Paris: Report for the Women's Rights Service, Ministry of Labor and Social Affairs.
22. Gelb, J. (1989). Feminism and politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.
23. Gornick, J., Meyers, M., & Ross, K. (1997). Supporting the employment of mothers: Policy variation across fourteen welfare states. Journal of European Policy, 7, 45-70.
24. Gottfried, H., & O'Relly, J. (2002). Re-regulating breadwinner models in socially conservative welfare regimes: Comparing Germany and Japan. Social Politics, 9(1), 29-59.
25. Halsaa, B. (1998). A strategic partnership for women's policies in Norway. In G. Lycklama à Nijeholt, V. Vargas, & S. Wieringa (Eds.). Women's movements and public policy in Europe, Latin America, and the Caribbean (pp. 167-187). New York: Garland.
26. International Parliamentary Union. Retrieved January 7, 2002, from http://www.ipu.org.
27. Jenkins-Smith, H. C., & Sabatier, P. A. (Eds). (1993). Policy change and learning: An advocacy coalition approach. Boulder, CO: Westview.
28. Jenson, J., & Sineau, M. (2000). France: Reconciling Republican equality with Φreedom of Choice." In J. Jenson & M. Sineau (Eds.). Who Cares? Women's work, childcare, and welfare state redesign (pp. 88-117). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
29. Keeler, J. T. S. (1985). Situating France on the pluralism corporatism continuum. Comparative Politics, 17(2), 229-249.
30. King, G., Keohane, R. O., & Verba, S. (1994). Designing social inquiry: Scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
31. Kolinsky, E. (1993). Party change and women's representation in Unified Germany. In J. Lovenduski & P. Norris (Eds.). Gender and party politics (pp. 113-146). London: Sage.
32. Korpi, W. (2000). Faces of gender inequality: Gender, class and patterns of inequalities in different types of welfare states. Social Politics, 1, 83-105.
33. Lemke, C. (2001). Changing the rules of the game: The role of law and the effects of party reforms on gender parity in Germany. In J. Klausen & C. S. Maier (Eds.). Has Liberalism failed? Assuring equal representation in Europe and the United States (pp. 123-141). New York: Palgrave.
34. Letablier, M.-T. (2001). Work and family balance: New trade off in France. Paper presented at the conference on "Changing Work and Life Patterns in Western Industrial Societies," Berlin, September.
35. Lewis, J. (1992). Gender and the development of welfare regimes. Journal of European Social Policy, 2(3), 159-173.
36. Liebert, U., & Sifft, S. (Eds.). (2003). Europeanisation and gender equality: Reframing public policy in EU member states. Bruxelles: Peter Lang.
37. Lijphart, A. (1971). Comparative politics and comparative method. American Political Science Review, 65, 682-693.
38. Lijphart, A. (1975). The comparable cases strategy in comparative research. Comparative Political Studies, 8, 481-496.
39. Lijphart, A. (1999). Patterns of democracy: Government forms and performance in thirty-six countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.
40. Mazur, A. G. (Ed.). (2001). State feminism, women's movements, and job training: Making democracies work in the global economy. New York: Routledge.
41. Mazur, A. G. (1995). Strong state and symbolic reform: The Ministère des Droits de la Femme in France. In D. McBride Stetson & A. G. Mazur (Eds.). Comparative state feminism (pp. 76-94). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
42. Mazur, A. G. (2002). Theorizing feminist policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
43. Morgan, K. (2002). Does anyone have a libre choix: Subversive liberalism and the politics of French child care policy. In S. Michel & R. Mahon (Eds.). Child care policy at the crossroads: Gender and welfare state restructuring (pp. 140-173). London: Routledge.
44. O'Connor, J. S., Orloff, A., & Shaver, S. (1999). States, markets, families: Gender Liberalism and social policy in Australia, Canada, Great Britain and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45. O'Reilly, J. (1995). Le travail à temps partiel en Allemagne de l'Est et en Allemagne de l'Ouest: Vers un 'modèle sociétal sexué.' (Part time Work in East and West Germany: Towards a Social Gender Model) Cahiers du Mage (Marché du Travail et Genre), 1(2), 77-88.
46. OECD. 2002. Employment Outlook. Paris: OECD.
47. Orloff, A. (2002). Women's employment and welfare regimes: Globalization, export orientation and social policy in Europe and North America. Social policy and development paper. United Nations Research Institute for Social Development. Program Paper 12.
48. Ostner, I., & Lewis, J. (1995). Gender and the evolution of European welfare states. In S. Liebfried & P. Pierson (Eds.). European social policy: Between fragmentation and integration (159-193). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
49. Phillips, A. (1991). Engendering democracy. University Park: University of Pennsylvania Press.
50. Phillips, A. (1995). The politics of presence. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
51. Pitkin, H. F. (1967). The concept of representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
52. Ragin, C. (1987). The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press.
53. Research Network on Gender, Politics, and the State (RNGS). (2002). Codebook for the Women's Movement and Women's Policy Office Project. In-Progress Codebook for dataset to be released in 2005.
54. Ruggie, M. (1984). The State and working women: A comparative study of Britain and Sweden. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
55. Sabatier, P. A. (1993). Policy change over a decade or more., In H. C. Jenkins-Smith & P. A. Sabatier (Eds.). Policy change and learning: An advocacy coalition approach. Boulder, CO: Westview.
56. Sainsbury, D. (Ed.). (1999). Gender regimes and welfare states. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
57. Schmitter, P. C. (1974). Still the century of corporatism? Review of Politics, 36, 85-131.
58. Stephens, E., & Huber, J. D. (2001). Development and crisis of the welfare state: Parties and policies in global markets. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
59. Stetson, D. McBride. (2001a). Democracy and the representation of women: France in comparative context. Journal of French Contemporary Civilization, 25(2), 175-192.
60. Stetson, D. McBride. (Ed.) (2001b). Abortion politics, women's movements and the democratic state: A comparative study of state feminism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
61. Stetson, D. McBride, & Mazur, A. G. (2002, October). Defining women's movements cross-nationally and over-time: Lessons from the Project of the Research Network on Gender, Politics and the State. Pacific Northwest Political Science Association. Bellevue, WA.
62. Teschner, J. (2000). Conflicting conceptions of feminism in united Germany. In A. Bull, H. Diamond, & R. Marsh (Eds.). Feminisms and women's movements in contemporary Europe (pp. 194-210). New York: St. Martin's.
63. Vargas, V., & Wieringa, S. (1998). The triangles of empowerment: Processes and actors in the making of public policy. In G. Lycklama à Nijeholt et al. (Eds.). Women's movements and public policy in Europe, Latin America, and the Caribbean. New York: Garland.
64. Young, B. (1999). Triumph of the fatherland: German unification and the marginalization of women. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.