Guidelines for Reporting Information in Studies of Diagnostic Test Accuracy: The STARD Initiative

Journal of Personality Assessment

Volumn 81, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 191-193

  Meyer, Gregory J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL RESEARCH; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; EDITORIAL; MEDICAL LITERATURE; META ANALYSIS; METHODOLOGY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PUBLICATION; SAMPLE SIZE; STANDARD; STANDARD FOR REPORTING OF DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; STATISTICS; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 0346955874     PISSN: 00223891     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/S15327752JPA8103_01     Document Type: Editorial

References (1)

1. Lijmer, J. C., Mol, B. W., Heisterkamp, S., Bonsel, G. J., Prins, M. H., van der Meulen, J. H. P., et al. (1999). Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests. Journal of the American Medical Association, 282, 1061-1066.