Comparing expectations to actual events: The post mortem of a Y2K analysis

System Dynamics Review

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 217-235

  Backus, George ^a,b   Schwein, Michael T ^c,d,e,f   Johnson, Scott T ^g   Walker, Robert J ^h  

^a Policy Assessment Corporation   (United States)

^b DARTMOUTH COLLEGE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^d Department of Geology and Geological Engineering   (United States)

^e Project Management Institute (PMI)

^f 2133 Braun Court ^*  (United States)

^g CAPGEMINI   (United States)

^h Delsys Research Group Inc   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0346942355     PISSN: 08837066     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sdr.217     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Ben-Akiva M, Lermans. 1985. Discrete Choice Analysis. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
2. Davies S. 2001. http://users.evols.com/steve 451/impact.htm.
3. 1999. Millennium uncertainties throw tech firms into Y2Kalamity, Denver Post. Business Section, p. IE. 27 December. See also http://www.denverpost.com.
4. Lear AC. 2000. Y2K rollover: few problems, many questions, Computer 33(2): 22-24.
5. Lyneis J. 1999. System dynamics for business strategy: a phased approach. System Dynamics Review 15(1): 1-34; System Dynamics for Business Strategy: A Successful Approach, http://www.strategicsimulation/pdfdocs/busstrat.pdf.
6. Lyneis J. 1999. System dynamics for business strategy: a phased approach. System Dynamics Review 15(1): 1-34; System Dynamics for Business Strategy: A Successful Approach, http://www.strategicsimulation/pdfdocs/busstrat.pdf.
7. Manski C, McFadden. 1986. Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometrics. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
8. Train K. 1986. Qualitative Choice Analysis. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
9. 1998. Wall Street Journal 12.30 p.m., 25 October.
10. Yardeni E. 2001. http://www.yardeni.com