Progressive reform, gender and institutional structure: A critical analysis of citizen participation in Detroit's Community Development Corporations (CDCs)

Urban Studies

Volumn 40, Issue 13, 2003, Pages 2731-2750

  Silverman, Robert Mark ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GENDER RELATIONS; INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK; LOCAL PARTICIPATION; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 0346905285     PISSN: 00420980     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0042098032000146867     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. ALINSKY, S. (1969) Reville for Radicals. New York: Vintage Books.
2. APPLETON, L. M. (1995) The gender regimes of American cities. in: J. A. GARBER and R. S. TURNER (Eds) Gender in Urban Research, pp. 44-59. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
3. ARNSTEIN, S. R. (1969) A ladder of citizen participation, Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), pp. 216-224.
4. BAER, S. E. and MARANDO, V. L. (2001) The subdistricting of cities: applying the polycentric model, Urban Affairs Review, 36(5), pp.721-733.
5. BOCKMEYER, J.L. (2000) A culture of distrust: the impact of local political culture on participation in the Detroit EZ, Urban Studies, 37(13), pp. 2417-2440.
6. BRATT, R. (1997) CDCs: contributions outweigh contradictions, a reply to Randy Stoecker, Journal of Urban Affairs, 19(1), pp. 23-28.
7. CHUNG, A. Y. and CHANG, E. T. (1998) From Third World liberation to multiple oppression politics: a contemporary approach to interethnic coalitions, Social Justice, 25(3), pp. 80-100.
8. CLAVEL, P. (1986) The Progressive City: Planning and Participation, 1969-1984. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
9. CLAVEL, P., PITT, J. and YIN, J. (1997) The community option in urban policy, Urban Affairs Review, 32(4). pp. 435-458.
10. COLLINS, P. H. (1993) Toward a New Vision: Race, Class, and Gender as Categories of Analysis and Connection, Race, Sex, and Class, 1(1), 25-45.
11. DESENA, J. N. (1998) Low-income women and community power, Sociological Spectrum, 18, pp, 311-332.
12. FEAGIN, J. R. and VERA, H. (2001) Liberation Sociology. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
13. FERGUSON, R.F. and STOUTLAND,. S.E (1999) Reconceiving the community development field, in: R. F. FERGUSON and W. T. DICKENS (Eds) Urban Problems and Community Development, pp. 33-75. Washington. DC: Brookings Institution Press.
14. FOSTER, M. K. and MEINHARD, A. G. (2002) A regression model explaining predisposition to collaborate, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 31(4), pp. 549-564.
15. GITTELL, M., ORTEGA-BUSTAMANTE, I. and STEFFY, T. (2000) Social capital and social change: women's community activism, Urban Affairs Review, 36(2), pp. 123-147.
16. GLASER, B. G. and STRAUSS, A. L. (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
17. GOETZ, E. G. and SIDNEY, M. (1995) Community development corporations as neighborhood advocates: a study of the political activism of nonprofit developers, Applied Behavioral Science Review, 3(1), pp. 1-20.
18. HYDE, C., MEYERS, M. and COOK, D. (2002) A new twist in nonprofit, for-profit, and public sector relationships: the community benefits district, International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 22(9/10), pp. 55-76.
19. KEATING, W.D. (1997) The CDC model of urban development: a reply to Randy Stoecker, Journal of Urban Affairs, 19(1), pp. 29-33.
20. MINKOFF, D. C. (2002) The Emergence of hybrid organizational forms: combining identity based service provision and political action, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 31(3), pp. 377-401.
21. NAPLES, N. A. (1998) Grassroots Warriors: Activist Mothering, Community Work, and the War on Poverty, New York: Routledge.
22. NATIONAL CONGRESS FOR COMMUNITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (1999) Coming of Age: Trends and Achievements of Community-based Development Organizations. Washington, DC: National Congress for Community Economic Development.
23. OTIS, E. M. (2001) The reach and limits of asian panethnic identity: the dynamics of gender, race, and class in a community-based organization, Qualitative Sociology, 24(3), pp.349-379.
24. PARDO, M.S. (1998) Mexican American Women Activists: Identity and Resistance in Two Los Angeles Communities. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
25. RUBIN, H. J. (2000) Renewing Hope within Neighborhoods of Despair: The Community-Based Development Model. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
26. SILVERMAN, R. M. (2001a) CDCs and charitable organizations in the urban South: mobilizing social capital based on race and religion for neighborhood revitalization, Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 30(2), pp. 240-268.
27. SILVERMAN, R. M. (2001b) Neighborhood characteristics, CDC emergence and the community development industry system: a case study of the American deep South, Community Development Journal, 36(3), pp. 234-245.
28. SIRIANNI, C. and FRIEDLAND, L. (2001) Civic Innovation in America: Community Empowerment, Public Policy, and the Movement for Civic Renewal. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
29. SMITH, D. H. (2000) Grassroots Associations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
30. SPAIN, D. (2002) What happened to gender relations on the way from Chicago to Los Angeles, City & Community, 1(2), pp. 155-167.
31. STAEHELI, L. A. and CLARKE, S.E. (1995) Gender, place, and citizenship, in: J. A. GARBER and R. S. TURNER (Eds) Gender in Urban Research, pp. 3-23. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
32. STALL, S., and STOECKER, R. (1998) Community organizing or organizing community?: Gender and the craft of empowerment, Gender and Society, 12(6), pp. 729-756.
33. STOECKER, R. (1997) The CDC model of urban redevelopment: a critique and an alternative, Journal of Urban Affairs, 19(1), pp. 1-22.
34. STRAUSS, A. and CORBIN, J. (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
35. TROLANDER, J. A. (1987) Professionalism and Social Change: From the Settlement House Movement to Neighborhood Centers, 1886 to the Present. New York: Columbia University Press.
36. TURNER, R. S. (1995) Concerns for gender in central city development policy, in: J. A. GARBER and R. S. TURNER (Eds) Gender in Urban Research, pp. 271-289. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
37. VIDAL, A. (1992) Rebuilding Communities: A National Study of Urban Community Development Corporations. New York: Community Development Research Center.
38. WARREN, M. R. (2001) Dry Bones Rattling: Community Building to Revitalize American Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
39. WILSON, W. J. (1999) The Bridge over the Racial Divide: Rising Inequality and Coalition Politics. Berkeley, CA/New York: University of California Press/Russell Sage Foundation.
40. WOOD, R. L. (2002) Faith in Action: Religion, Race, and Democratic Organizing in America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
41. WOOD, R. L. and WARREN, M. R. (2002) A different face of faith-based politics: social capital and community organizing in the public arena, International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 22(9/10), pp. 6-54.
42. YIN, J. S. (1998) The community development industry system: a case study of polities and institutions in Cleveland, 1967-1997, Journal of Urban Affairs, 20(2), pp. 137-157.