Ischemic Cardiomyopathy: Value of Different MRI Techniques for Prediction of Functional Recovery after Revascularization

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 182, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 95-100

  Van Hoe, Lieven ^a   Vanderheyden, Marc ^b  

^a OLV HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

^b CARDIOVASCULAR CENTER   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; DOBUTAMINE; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE MEGLUMINE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING AGENT;

ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CARDIOMYOPATHY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; HEART FUNCTION; HEART INFARCTION SIZE; HEART MUSCLE CONTRACTILITY; HEART MUSCLE REVASCULARIZATION; HUMAN; IMAGING SYSTEM; ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0346881499     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.182.1.1820095     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Gersh BJ, Anderson JL. Thrombolysis and myocardial salvage: results of clinical trials and the animal paradigm-paradoxic or predictable? Circulation 1993;88:296-306
2. Vatner SF, Heyndrickx GR. Ubiquity of myocardial stunning. Basic Res Cardiol 1995;90:253-256
3. Wijns W, Vatner SF, Camici PG. Hibernating myocardium. N Engl J Med 1998;339:173-181
4. Vanoverschelde JL, Wijns W, Borgers M, et al. Chronic myocardial hibernation in humans: from bedside to bench. Circulation 1997;95:1961-1971
5. Ambrosio G, Betocchi S, Pace L, et al. Prolonged impairment of regional contractile function after resolution of exercise-induced angina: evidence of myocardial stunning in patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation 1996;94:2455-2464
6. Renkin J, Wijns W, Ladha Z, Col J. Reversal of segmental hypokinesis by coronary angioplasty in patients with unstable angina, persistent T wave inversion, and left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis: additional evidence for myocardial stunning in humans. Circulation 1990;82:913-921
7. Beller GA. Noninvasive assessment of myocardial viability. N Engl J Med 2000;343:1488-1490
8. Pierard LA, Lancellotti P, Benoit T. Myocardial viability: stress echocardiography versus nuclear medicine. Eur Heart J 1997;18:117-123
9. Kim RJ, Wu E, Rafael A, et al. The use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to identify reversible myocardial dysfunction. N Engl J Med 2000;343:1445-1453
10. Fieno DS, Kim RJ, Chen EL, Lomasney JW, Klocke FJ, Judd RM. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of myocardium at risk: distinction between reversible and irreversible injury throughout infarct healing. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36:1985-1991
11. Arai AE. Magnetic resonance first-pass myocardial perfusion imaging. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2000;11:383-398
12. Wu KC, Zerhouni EA, Judd RM, et al. Prognostic significance of microvascular obstruction by magnetic resonance imaging in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 1998;97:765-772
13. Hillenbrand HB, Kim RJ, Parker MA, Fieno DS, Judd RM. Early assessment of myocardial salvage by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 2000;102:1678-1683
14. Sandstede JJ, Lipke C, Beer M, et al. Analysis of first-pass and delayed contrast-enhancement patterns of dysfunctional myocardium on MR imaging: use in the prediction of myocardial viability. AJR 2000;174:1737-1740
15. Baer FM, Voth E, Theissen P, Schneider CA, Schicha H, Sechtem U. Comparison of low-dose dobutamine-gradient-echo magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography with [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose in patients with chronic coronary artery disease: a functional and morphological approach to the detection of residual myocardial viability. Circulation 1995;91:1006-1015
16. Lauerma K, Niemi P, Hänninen H, et al. Multi-modality MR imaging assessment of myocardial viability: combination of first-pass and late contrast enhancement to wall motion dynamics and comparison with FDG PET-initial experience. Radiology 2000;217:729-736
17. Rogers WJ, Kramer CM, Geskin G, et al. Early contrast-enhanced MRI predicts late functional recovery after reperfused myocardial infarction. Circulation 1999;99:744-750
18. Ramani K, Judd RM, Holly TA, et al. Contrast magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of myocardial viability in patients with stable coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction. Circulation 1998;98:2687-2694
19. Simonetti O, Kim RJ, Fieno DS, et al. An improved MR imaging technique for the visualization of myocardial infarction. Radiology 2001;218:215-223
20. Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, et al. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation 2002;105:539-542
21. Gönen M, Panageas KS, Larson SM. Statistical issues in analysis of diagnostic imaging experiments with multiple observations per patient. Radiology 2001;221:763-767
22. 201T1 in patients with chronic coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction. Circulation 1992;86:1125-1137
23. Sensky PR, Jivan A, Hudson NM, et al. Coronary artery disease: combined stress MR imaging protocol-one-stop evaluation of myocardial perfusion and function. Radiology 2000;215:608-614